"my point is". Said this way too many times.
His alleged theological basis for abortion seems internally inconsistent/hypocritical with his beliefs. 'life begins at first breath' - and then 10 minutes later talking bout all the living organisms in us. This position would support late-term abortion, which he appears to be against. Ignores that the fetus gets oxygen from the mother. Same with 'consent' (ignoring that a woman consents to have sex - he is not talking about this in the rape context) - that would also support late-term abortion, which he appears to be against. So he apparently disagrees with his supposed theological basis for abortion.
Some points he made some sense, even if there is room for disagreement (10 commandments in classroom; founding fathers idea of government not dictating religion)
His thoughts about religion *******izing things has some truth to it. Agree that Love God, Love thy Neighbor should be lodestar. Mark 12:31.
Well spoken. seems sincere and genuine. Wolf in sheep clothing vibe; dems will love him (can wrap a lot of bad policies into misinterpreted christian principles). (edit: and of course here they go again:
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/07/19/james-talarico-texas-democrat-joe-rogan-interview-00441989 (
Joe Rogan's Latest Guest Might Turn Texas Blue))