DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

310,015 Views | 3550 Replies | Last: 6 hrs ago by AggieVictor10
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

Preferring Trump over the alternative is one thing, but actually defending his every action at this point is something eerily similar to Obama.

It's bizarre. There are some here that could not state even one criticism of Trump, ever.

I've turned around on the guy and think he's done great on immigration, foreign policy, real action on drug cartels, ending wars, handling Iran A++, energy etc...

But I don't like his tariffs, the deficit explosion, the graft and corruption or the handling of the Epstein files.
Ervin Burrell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

TXAGBQ76 said:

What are your expectations- they give up their lives and let what happened to them destroy their lives forever?
We lost a son to a drug overdose six years ago. While we still have tough days, we smile, we laugh, we enjoy our grandsons and our daughter, etc. Life goes on after tragedies.

But maybe that's just me.


It's bizarre. This board went from 100% all in on Epstein (this is where I first heard about like 10 years ago) and wanting answers to victim shaming and maybe even insuating that they are lying.

Who cares if those women have made efforts to move on? Trump said we'd get the truth and that's why MAGA voted for him. Now that there is a little seed planted in our minds that thinks "ummm…maybe", we just dismiss it, say it's not important, need to move on and question victims.

Ugh.

Cult gonna cult.
Whoop2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Epstein is not why I voted for Trump
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whoop2 said:

Epstein is not why I voted for Trump


I bet governmental transparency was a major reason though
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Whoop2 said:

Epstein is not why I voted for Trump


I bet governmental transparency was a major reason though


"Drain the swamp*!"


*Trump's rich friends from New York excluded.
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I can assure you that the average voter on either side is more morally aligned with one another than they are with the human excrement either of them vote for and defend to the death.

Yet the TV says we should hate one another instead. Laugh
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pritzker… Pritzker… that name sounds vaguely familiar. Doesn't he have a famous cousin who once was heavily involved in Hillary's 2008 campaign?

Have any of the Clinton's been noted to take the Lolita Express? Imagine a world where the posthumous scribe from a victim says that one person committed no wrongdoing but continues to describe members of the Democratic elite as being involved - yet folks want to blame the guy who did nothing wrong for some sort of coverup.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The entire Pritzker family is odd as all get out.





"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JBs wife looks like she could have been a male Pritzker.

But that's typical of the left elitist. Hippos in tutus.
Dan Carlin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

I can assure you that the average voter on either side is more morally aligned with one another than they are with the human excrement either of them vote for and defend to the death.

Yet the TV says we should hate one another instead. Laugh


It's sad but true.

Can't we get all the dirt on Bill Clinton AND Donald Trump in one go?

Bill Gates is laughing his ass off at how conspiratorial anti-vaxxers in the GOP are among the coalition protecting his naughty little secrets.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

I can assure you that the average voter on either side is more morally aligned with one another than they are with the human excrement either of them vote for and defend to the death.

Yet the TV says we should hate one another instead. Laugh


This.
Dirty_Mike&the_boys
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

JBs wife looks like she could have been a male Pritzker.

But that's typical of the left elitist. Hippos in tutus.

That's James Pritzker who calls himself "Jennifer" Pritzker.

And now you know why that fat tub is so pro trans
"We're going to turn this red Prius into a soup kitchen!"
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No, I am speaking of the First Lady of Illinois, Mary Katherine Muenster. Know by most as the Real Miss Piggy.


74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The conclusion drawn by the comment up top is not directly supported by the travel manifest, but if the document is real the political optics are very ugly. TBD.....

94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've been watching the Netflix series, and it's just amazing how many people have been bought, blackmailed, or fearing implication in the files. Originally it was law enforcement, up to the highest levels of the FBI, protecting Epstein. Now it's politicians protecting themselves.

It's amazing to think that trafficked girls who were threatened to recruit more victims have been treated like criminals, while the actual perpetrators continue to walk free.

The Washington elite and their oligarch cronies will do ANYTHING now to keep their sins in the dark.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This thread has become the Q thread for leftists on TexAgs.
The left cannot kill the Spirit of Charlie Kirk.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94chem said:

I've been watching the Netflix series, and it's just amazing how many people have been bought, blackmailed, or fearing implication in the files. Originally it was law enforcement, up to the highest levels of the FBI, protecting Epstein. Now it's politicians protecting themselves.

It's amazing to think that trafficked girls who were threatened to recruit more victims have been treated like criminals, while the actual perpetrators continue to walk free.

The Washington elite and their oligarch cronies will do ANYTHING now to keep their sins in the dark.

How so? In fact, I think wide latitude has been given the accusers who have provided scant little out of some supposed fear they will be sued into oblivion for speaking.

The United States of America do not have anything remotely resembling oligarchs, which is somewhat redundant with cronies.

Though I agree the establishment elite, let primarily by the Dems and career Rs in both elected office and in the alphabet agencies, have indeed kept their sins in the dark.

Its refreshing that Trump has his DOJ working with Speaker Johnson to finally get some of this information out.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
74OA said:

The conclusion drawn by the comment up top is not directly supported by the travel manifest, but if the document is real the political optics are very ugly. TBD.....



We are to believe a guy who won't pay $8/month to have a checkmark who then posts this crap without even adding references or footnotes?

And $130 million is a heck of a fine to pay to keep your dad from looking bad. Is there anything to show these two things are related?
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

94chem said:

I've been watching the Netflix series, and it's just amazing how many people have been bought, blackmailed, or fearing implication in the files. Originally it was law enforcement, up to the highest levels of the FBI, protecting Epstein. Now it's politicians protecting themselves.

It's amazing to think that trafficked girls who were threatened to recruit more victims have been treated like criminals, while the actual perpetrators continue to walk free.

The Washington elite and their oligarch cronies will do ANYTHING now to keep their sins in the dark.

How so? In fact, I think wide latitude has been given the accusers who have provided scant little out of some supposed fear they will be sued into oblivion for speaking.



Before Epstein was ever arrested, there were mountains of evidence, including corroborating stories from victims about the layout of the house, the actions of Mr. Epstein, the recruitment process, crimes against the underaged, threats against them for telling anybody, being loaned out to associates, etc. Despite all of this evidence, officials at the local, state, and federal level repeatedly put the lid on things, and to this day they will not explain why they dragged their feet, declined to indict on the more serious crimes, etc.

Based on this, do you think those victims are justified in their unwillingness to speak? Even those who tell the truth end up worse off, after they've been further abused by defense attorneys and the media. See Prince Andrew's accuser, for example.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Dan Carlin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

This thread has become the Q thread for leftists on TexAgs.


Other than how Epstein was a convicted pedophile who dabbled in the most powerful social circles on the planet, whereas Q-anon was invented in some loser's basement for teh lulz, your metaphor is spot on.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94chem said:

flown-the-coop said:

94chem said:

I've been watching the Netflix series, and it's just amazing how many people have been bought, blackmailed, or fearing implication in the files. Originally it was law enforcement, up to the highest levels of the FBI, protecting Epstein. Now it's politicians protecting themselves.

It's amazing to think that trafficked girls who were threatened to recruit more victims have been treated like criminals, while the actual perpetrators continue to walk free.

The Washington elite and their oligarch cronies will do ANYTHING now to keep their sins in the dark.

How so? In fact, I think wide latitude has been given the accusers who have provided scant little out of some supposed fear they will be sued into oblivion for speaking.



Before Epstein was ever arrested, there were mountains of evidence, including corroborating stories from victims about the layout of the house, the actions of Mr. Epstein, the recruitment process, crimes against the underaged, threats against them for telling anybody, being loaned out to associates, etc. Despite all of this evidence, officials at the local, state, and federal level repeatedly put the lid on things, and to this day they will not explain why they dragged their feet, declined to indict on the more serious crimes, etc.

Based on this, do you think those victims are justified in their unwillingness to speak? Even those who tell the truth end up worse off, after they've been further abused by defense attorneys and the media. See Prince Andrew's accuser, for example.



You missed the Acosta testimony that was released by Republican SOTH.

Also, what were your thoughts after reading Guthries memoir?
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

94chem said:

flown-the-coop said:

94chem said:

I've been watching the Netflix series, and it's just amazing how many people have been bought, blackmailed, or fearing implication in the files. Originally it was law enforcement, up to the highest levels of the FBI, protecting Epstein. Now it's politicians protecting themselves.

It's amazing to think that trafficked girls who were threatened to recruit more victims have been treated like criminals, while the actual perpetrators continue to walk free.

The Washington elite and their oligarch cronies will do ANYTHING now to keep their sins in the dark.

How so? In fact, I think wide latitude has been given the accusers who have provided scant little out of some supposed fear they will be sued into oblivion for speaking.



Before Epstein was ever arrested, there were mountains of evidence, including corroborating stories from victims about the layout of the house, the actions of Mr. Epstein, the recruitment process, crimes against the underaged, threats against them for telling anybody, being loaned out to associates, etc. Despite all of this evidence, officials at the local, state, and federal level repeatedly put the lid on things, and to this day they will not explain why they dragged their feet, declined to indict on the more serious crimes, etc.

Based on this, do you think those victims are justified in their unwillingness to speak? Even those who tell the truth end up worse off, after they've been further abused by defense attorneys and the media. See Prince Andrew's accuser, for example.



You missed the Acosta testimony that was released by Republican SOTH.

Also, what were your thoughts after reading Guthries memoir?


I guess I don't know how Acosta could be any less credible, or how Giuffre could be any more credible. She showed a lot more fortitude and courage going after Prince Andrew than Acosta did in going after Epstein, and she had only a fraction of the evidence.

On a personal note, I have three beautiful daughters, all clustered around the age that Virginia was. The stories they tell us about how girls and women are abused at their schools is pretty tragic.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnson needs to swear in the duly elected member from Arizona and stop his traitorous behavior.
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

Johnson needs to swear in the duly elected member from Arizona and stop his traitorous behavior.


Senate dems need to open the government first. If they want to take their ball and go home there are consequences.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Queso1 said:

TXAGBQ76 said:

What are your expectations- they give up their lives and let what happened to them destroy their lives forever?
We lost a son to a drug overdose six years ago. While we still have tough days, we smile, we laugh, we enjoy our grandsons and our daughter, etc. Life goes on after tragedies.

But maybe that's just me.


It's bizarre. This board went from 100% all in on Epstein (this is where I first heard about like 10 years ago) and wanting answers to victim shaming and maybe even insuating that they are lying.

Who cares if those women have made efforts to move on? Trump said we'd get the truth and that's why MAGA voted for him. Now that there is a little seed planted in our minds that thinks "ummm…maybe", we just dismiss it, say it's not important, need to move on and question victims.

Ugh.

Hey I wanted to respond with an anecdote from work, but that's not allowed apparently? Mods, help me out? I'll try again, let me know if this is somehow off topic in the Epstein thread?

I have coworkers whose tune has changed on Epstein, in March they couldn't stop talking about it. Now, I'm not sure they even remember who Epstein is.
ETFan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J. Walter Weatherman said:

ETFan said:

Johnson needs to swear in the duly elected member from Arizona and stop his traitorous behavior.


Senate dems need to open the government first. If they want to take their ball and go home there are consequences.

They've sworn in republicans during shutdown. Next excuse.

Mods, is this on topic?
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ETFan said:

Queso1 said:

TXAGBQ76 said:

What are your expectations- they give up their lives and let what happened to them destroy their lives forever?
We lost a son to a drug overdose six years ago. While we still have tough days, we smile, we laugh, we enjoy our grandsons and our daughter, etc. Life goes on after tragedies.

But maybe that's just me.


It's bizarre. This board went from 100% all in on Epstein (this is where I first heard about like 10 years ago) and wanting answers to victim shaming and maybe even insuating that they are lying.

Who cares if those women have made efforts to move on? Trump said we'd get the truth and that's why MAGA voted for him. Now that there is a little seed planted in our minds that thinks "ummm…maybe", we just dismiss it, say it's not important, need to move on and question victims.

Ugh.

Hey I wanted to respond with an anecdote from work, but that's not allowed apparently? Mods, help me out? I'll try again, let me know if this is somehow off topic in the Epstein thread?

I have coworkers whose tune has changed on Epstein, in March they couldn't stop talking about it. Now, I'm not sure they even remember who Epstein is.

Indeed.

Unfortunately, the truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
J. Walter Weatherman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ETFan said:

J. Walter Weatherman said:

ETFan said:

Johnson needs to swear in the duly elected member from Arizona and stop his traitorous behavior.


Senate dems need to open the government first. If they want to take their ball and go home there are consequences.

They've sworn in republicans during shutdown. Next excuse.

Mods, is this on topic?


I'm just repeating what Johnson has said. Seems like a pretty easy solution, as soon as the dems decide to do their jobs and open the government she will be sworn in.
94chem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:



Rest well, Virginia. You achieved more with your humble life than the entire FBI, DOJ, Congress, POTUS, and local law enforcement combined.
94chem,
That, sir, was the greatest post in the history of TexAgs. I salute you. -- Dough
Gig em G
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Amen
74OA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
94chem said:

PaulsBunions said:



Rest well, Virginia. You achieved more with your humble life than the entire FBI, DOJ, Congress, POTUS, and local law enforcement combined.

……and the King of England clearly believes there's enough fire underneath the clouds of Epstein smoke for him to take down his own royal brother.

Release all the files and let the rest of the chips fall where they may, too.

PEDO
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fact they still haven't admitted to what Epstein really was is insane to me. The ruling class is spitting in our face and we have Trump psychophants cheering them on. Bizzaro World.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FWTXAg said:

The fact they still haven't admitted to what Epstein really was is insane to me. The ruling class is spitting in our face and we have Trump psychophants cheering them on. Bizzaro World.

How do you arrive at such nonsense?

And what was Epstein that you believe people are not admitting to?
First Page
Page 101 of 102
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.