Senate Democrats Slow Rolling Confirmations

1,736 Views | 23 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by MasonB
MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haven't seen this discussed here, but the democrats are gumming up the presidential nomination process and trying to run out the clock on the administration as much as possible.

1300 positions require Senate confirmation. Only 109 have been confirmed. Many were voted positively out of committee months ago and can't do their official duties until confirmed.

Quote:

The backlog, Lee told The Daily Signal, not only hampers the Trump administration's work but also slows the Senate's ability to consider legislative proposals.



https://www.dailysignal.com/2025/08/01/op-senator-warns-trump-nominee-backlog-never-get-caught-up/
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was told this was the republicans doing this. All the members are preventing the senate from going on recess, so no recess appointments can be made. Was I lied to?
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently so.


I'm Gipper
Ghost of Andrew Eaton
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?
If you say you hate the state of politics in this nation and you don't get involved in it, you obviously don't hate the state of politics in this nation.
GeorgiAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't think either party can complain about this. They both do it.
BboroAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GeorgiAg said:

I don't think either party can complain about this. They both do it.


…something something Republicrats…
MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I was told this was the republicans doing this. All the members are preventing the senate from going on recess, so no recess appointments can be made. Was I lied to?


They want to avoid recess appointments if they can because they would expire next year.
MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I don't think either party can complain about this. They both do it.


Yes and no.

There is always a spike at the end of July, first of August when a big batch gets passed through by unanimous consent. Apparently Trump is the first president where the senate has refused to do this or by voice vote and it's because its being blocked by the democrats.

There have also been intentional paperwork delays, missed deadlines, and other nefarious activities in the whole clearing process just to get to committee votes.

So while delays have been a practice, the ante has really been upped to an unprecedented level.

So while some degree of this has become normal, it's a different game now.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?


Not exactly. Both Bush 43 and Obama had almost all of their nominees confirmed by roll call vote in the Senate. With Trump, it dropped to 65% and for Biden it was 57%. The overall rate of confirmations significantly slowed for Trump's first term and Mitch McConnell returned to favor on Biden. Now we are stuck with a tit for tat trying to slow the confirmation process to a crawl.

https://ourpublicservice.org/performance-measures/political-appointee-tracker/

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What is happening is unprecedented. As of last week, 1 federal judge nominee had been confirmed and 0 US attorney nominees had been confirmed. 7 months in.
Ag with kids
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90 said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?


Not exactly. Both Bush 43 and Obama had almost all of their nominees confirmed by roll call vote in the Senate. With Trump, it dropped to 65% and for Biden it was 57%. The overall rate of confirmations significantly slowed for Trump's first term and Mitch McConnell returned to favor on Biden. Now we are stuck with a tit for tat trying to slow the confirmation process to a crawl.

https://ourpublicservice.org/performance-measures/political-appointee-tracker/



But but but it was started by the evil Republicans!!!!
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ag with kids said:

Ulysses90 said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?


Not exactly. Both Bush 43 and Obama had almost all of their nominees confirmed by roll call vote in the Senate. With Trump, it dropped to 65% and for Biden it was 57%. The overall rate of confirmations significantly slowed for Trump's first term and Mitch McConnell returned to favor on Biden. Now we are stuck with a tit for tat trying to slow the confirmation process to a crawl.

https://ourpublicservice.org/performance-measures/political-appointee-tracker/



But but but it was started by the evil Republicans!!!!


Pro College Station Convention Center
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Serious question.

I know that there is not really anything Trump can do with the judges.

But, can Trump hire his nominees into interim positions that are not officially the position requiring confirmation until they are voted up or down?

Or, hire someone who is even more of a fire-brand and put them in charge (but not officially) until the confirmation?
It takes a special kind of brainwashed useful idiot to politically defend government fraud, waste, and abuse.
MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

But, can Trump hire his nominees into interim positions that are not officially the position requiring confirmation until they are voted up or down?

Or, hire someone who is even more of a fire-brand and put them in charge (but not officially) until the confirmation?


They can be advisors, but not perform official duties (make decisions, sign off on things, hold themselves out to be on that role)

MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Full disclosure - I'm married to one of those fire-brands.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90 said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?


Not exactly. Both Bush 43 and Obama had almost all of their nominees confirmed by roll call vote in the Senate. With Trump, it dropped to 65% and for Biden it was 57%. The overall rate of confirmations significantly slowed for Trump's first term and Mitch McConnell returned to favor on Biden. Now we are stuck with a tit for tat trying to slow the confirmation process to a crawl.

https://ourpublicservice.org/performance-measures/political-appointee-tracker/



But you guys there's no difference because both parties do it.
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
techno-ag said:

Ag with kids said:

Ulysses90 said:

Ghost of Andrew Eaton said:

Hasn't this been SOP since about 2001?


Not exactly. Both Bush 43 and Obama had almost all of their nominees confirmed by roll call vote in the Senate. With Trump, it dropped to 65% and for Biden it was 57%. The overall rate of confirmations significantly slowed for Trump's first term and Mitch McConnell returned to favor on Biden. Now we are stuck with a tit for tat trying to slow the confirmation process to a crawl.

https://ourpublicservice.org/performance-measures/political-appointee-tracker/



But but but it was started by the evil Republicans!!!!






tbis illustration could be used in just about every argument between conservatives and liberals.

democrats are hypocrites of all of their ****ty qualities tbis is one that i despise the most.
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Congress is so ****ed up! The people voted in a president. The president gets to make confirmations. It's congress' job to approve or disapprove (for good cause) the nominations. That's their ****ing job! Quit being obstructionist and do the will of the people.
Get better ideas and maybe your side will win next time.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's absolutely not a comparison. Schumer has denied any voice votes, insisting on 3-day roll call for all nominees that come up, per ridiculous senate rules. It's simple obstruction, over and over.

50:1 is not 'well, both sides do it.'
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Liberals lie and "concerned moderates" equivocate. It's what they do.
Stat Monitor Repairman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Soft coup rolls on …
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I remember when that **** Thune said they'd go to recess appointments if needed to get these all through

That guy was so FOS.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump will likely start playing hardball with the Senate, refusing to sign legislation they want or something until they confirm his nominees.

Can also be used in the primaries. "This guy obstructed important agendas by holding up critical appointments." etc.
Pro College Station Convention Center
MasonB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I remember when that **** Thune said they'd go to recess appointments if needed to get these all through


Recess appointments aren't the sledgehammer people think. They expire at the end of the senate term and ultimately have to go back through the confirmation process, where they can just get held up again.

It would be far better to do this the way it has traditionally been done with a combination of unanimous consent and voice votes.

But for many democrats, the fact that Trump appointed them is a disqualifying factor. Look at the votes out of committee. I haven't looked at all of them, but the ones I have seen are straight party line votes. There is no "I don't agree with you politically but your qualifications and character are acceptable, so I will vote yes." It's simply, Trump wants you so you must be bad.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.