After carrying cheaters around my neck for the last dozen years because I didn't want to 'wear glasses' (even though I wore them every waking hour) I finally broke down and went to the eye Dr. a few weeks ago. I thought TxDot was using new lower resolution road signs, but it turns out they are much clearer with a bit of prescription for distance. Who knew. Apparently my wife and kids did - but I digress.
The Doc suggested progressive lenses (my cheaters were 2.5, don't laugh) and even though the eyeglass tech told me "Old people don't usually like progressives" - joke's on him - I took to them with no complaints. The only downside for me has been the blurred peripheral vision that is part of the equation with these lenses - but for everyday use I just point with my nose and all is good.
One of the biggest fears I ever had about getting a distance correction was that it would end my days of sight fishing. Clearly (pun intended) that was an irrational fear because I see so much better, I'm itching to get a pair of dedicated fishing sunglasses and give them a try. However, I'm wondering if I should do that in a progressive lens or have my fishing sunglasses be regular ol' bifocals. In the past I fished with bifocals and no prescription on top, so I'm used to that. The interweb says that progressives are great for fishing but that feels like a generic AI answer. I only fish for the intermediate distance (that's two in one post, personal best) at arms length and I don't know if that is a big deal on the boat when I'm either looking for a fish in the water or at the fly in my hand. Part of me thinks going progressive might waste valuable lens space (and introduce blurriness) on a correction I can do without for the time I'm wearing these particular glasses.
For the old & bifocal crowd, did you get progressive lenses in your fishing sunglasses? TIA.
The Doc suggested progressive lenses (my cheaters were 2.5, don't laugh) and even though the eyeglass tech told me "Old people don't usually like progressives" - joke's on him - I took to them with no complaints. The only downside for me has been the blurred peripheral vision that is part of the equation with these lenses - but for everyday use I just point with my nose and all is good.
One of the biggest fears I ever had about getting a distance correction was that it would end my days of sight fishing. Clearly (pun intended) that was an irrational fear because I see so much better, I'm itching to get a pair of dedicated fishing sunglasses and give them a try. However, I'm wondering if I should do that in a progressive lens or have my fishing sunglasses be regular ol' bifocals. In the past I fished with bifocals and no prescription on top, so I'm used to that. The interweb says that progressives are great for fishing but that feels like a generic AI answer. I only fish for the intermediate distance (that's two in one post, personal best) at arms length and I don't know if that is a big deal on the boat when I'm either looking for a fish in the water or at the fly in my hand. Part of me thinks going progressive might waste valuable lens space (and introduce blurriness) on a correction I can do without for the time I'm wearing these particular glasses.
For the old & bifocal crowd, did you get progressive lenses in your fishing sunglasses? TIA.
