Status:
Committed
Rating: n/a
?
National Avg
Rating: 91.3
?
School Preferences
School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Clemson
Committed
3/9/2025
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Arkansas
None
Boston College
None
Charlotte
None
East Carolina
None
Florida
None
Florida State
None
Georgia
None
Georgia Southern
None
Georgia Tech
None
Kansas
None
Louisville
None
Marshall
None
Miami
None
Michigan
None
Mississippi State
None
Missouri
None
Ohio State
None
Oklahoma
None
Oregon
None
Penn State
None
Pittsburgh
None
South Alabama
None
South Carolina
None
South Florida
None
Tennessee
None
Toledo
None
Troy
None
Tulane
None
UCF
None
West Virginia
None
Western Kentucky
None
+ 29 More
Videos
(1 Total)
1/19/2025
Pace (FL) OL Grant Wise continues to grow relationships with A&M coaches
Photos
(6 Total)
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.×