default image
Status:
Committed
HIGH SCHOOL

Jeron Jones

Cornerback
6′0″ / 175 lbs
Mission Viejo, CA
Mission Viejo
Class of 2026
Rating: n/a
?

National Avg
Rating: 90.0
?

School Preferences

School
Interest
Offer
Official Visit
Washington
Committed
6/18/2025
Texas A&M
None
Alabama
None
Arizona
None
Arizona State
None
Boise State
None
California
None
Colorado
None
Colorado State
None
Oregon
None
Oregon State
None
Sacramento State
None
San Diego State
None
SMU
None
TCU
None
Tennessee
None
Texas
None
UNLV
None
USC
None
Wake Forest
None
+ 15 More

Videos

(1 Total)
Junior Season Highlights

Updates

Fifteen official visitors ventured to College Station over the weekend
1 mo ago by Ryan Brauninger
Fifteen official visitors ventured to College Station over the weekend
With 15 official visitors in town over the weekend, Texas A&M watched as its 2026 class grew with the commitment of ATH Kaeden Johnson. Now with 15 members to the haul, here's where Mike Elko and the Aggies stand with each of the weekend's visitors.
Jason Howell
1 mo ago by Jason Howell
Official Visit List (June 13)
Here's the list we have at this time. Of course we will continue to update it as we gather informationTexas A&M commitsLB Storm Miller, Strongsville (OH) CB Victor Singleton, Toledo (OH) Central Catholic DB Camren Hamiel, Goodyear (AZ) Desert Edge 2026 ProspectsRB KJ Edwards, Carthage (TX)WR Boobie Feaster, DeSoto (TX)WR Jase Mathews, Leakesville (MS) Greene CountyOL Avery Morcho, Missouri City (TX) Fort Bend Ridge PointDL Lamar Brown, Baton Rouge (LA) University LabDE KJ Ford, Duncanville (TX)Edge Jaquez Wilkes, Wadley (AL)LB DaQuives Beck, Carthage (TX)LB Tamarion Watkins, Rock Hill (SC) NorthwesternCB Jeron Jones, Mission Viejo (CA) S Tylan Wilson, Pascagoula (MS)ATH Kaeden Johnson, Missouri City (TX) Fort Bend Marshall
Cade Draughon
1 yr ago by Cade Draughon
Texas A&M Scholarship Offer Recap 5/10-5/17
2025OL Mario Nash, De Kalb (MS) Kemper County - Offer Date: May 10https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16233753/64e2d011f327bf09f0a137faDL JJ Hanne, Rancho Santa Margarita (CA) Santa Margarita Catholic - Offer Date: May 13https://www.hudl.com/video/3/18572104/6507ab5ca676570578bf91b72026WR Tristen Keys, Hattiesburg (MS) Hattiesburg - Offer Date: May 14https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17603464/64fdfe9706622c0bccfc4f52WR Tyreek King, Knoxville (TN) Knoxville Catholic - Offer Date: May 15https://www.hudl.com/video/3/15771057/6562880ab023ac0a786f8e18WR Shavar Young Jr., Knoxville (TN) Webb School of Knoxville - Offer Date: May 15https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19566788/64fa813db01a1f08b45c47bfWR Gordon Sellars, Charlotte (NC) Providence Day - Offer Date: May 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/18387052/655b7350b534910ad44d8d71OL Mataalii Benjamin, Lehi (UT) Skyridge - Offer Date: May 14https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19452975/64ea22094deb260bc08ce75fDL Aiden Harris, Matthews (NC) Weddington - Offer Date: May 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/18058093/650f8ba3b0233407e8616762DL Andrew Harris, Matthews (NC) Weddington - Offer Date: May 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17909584/657dd3e94deb5d0358d059a9LB Thomas Davis Jr., Matthews (NC) Weddington - Offer Date: May 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/13854821/6579f6e1f326920a2c1eccbdCB Jeron Jones, Mission Viejo (CA) Mission Viejo - Offer Date: May 10https://www.hudl.com/video/3/17553833/655aa317344a3105306bc8fdCB Dequane Prevo, Texarkana (TX) Liberty-Eylau - ReOffer Date: May 16https://www.hudl.com/video/3/15055059/651251e2b3d3620ee029ae36S Bralan Womack, Flowood (MS) Hartfield Academy - Offer Date: May 10https://www.hudl.com/video/3/16251071/6510d33a90fa0e04c8c793cf2027WR Delontay Williams, Spring Valley (CA) Mount Miguel - Offer Date: May 15https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19491363/64ec10364ba8730b28bae567OL Brian Swanson, Dallas (TX) South Oak Cliff - Offer Date: May 15https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19703301/6585d6679a912e02c832e8b6DL Deven Robertson, Hattiesburg (MS) Oak Grove - Offer Date: May 14https://www.hudl.com/video/3/19649694/65641beed4688a09541a1ae6
×

TexAgs National Average Rating

The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services, along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect, which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.

The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of how individual prospects rank nationally.
×

TexAgs Rating

The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas. From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.

99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)

Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.

90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)

Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor at the collegiate level with high professional potential.

80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)

Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect. Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career. Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.

70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)

Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development. Professional potential is low.
×

Staff Predictions

The predictions represent which school each staff member believes will ultimately sign the recruit, and the confidence meter represents his level of certainty in that outcome.

Example #1

If the predicted school is Texas A&M and confidence is set to “High”, then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Texas A&M and I feel very certain about that.”

Example #2

If the predicted school is “Alabama” and confidence is set to “Low,” then the staff member is saying “I believe that this recruit will ultimately sign with Alabama, but I’m not very certain about that.”
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.