Offensive Lineman
6′6″
/
318 lbs
Collierville, TN
Collierville
Freshman (RS)
34:07
9 days ago by
Billy Liucci
Offense in Review feat. Stephen McGee: Texas A&M 44, Utah State 22
For a second week in a row, the Fightin' Texas Aggie offense was very productive as Marcel Reed & Co. rolled up 554 yards on Utah State. Billy Liucci, along with Stephen McGee, analyzes what worked in Week 2 and what needs to be cleaned up moving forward.
61:57
9 days ago by
Billy Liucci
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Live (Monday, September 8)
TexAgs' co-owner and executive editor Billy Liucci joined TexAgs Live on Monday morning following No. 16 Texas A&M's 22-point win over Utah State. Liucci also discussed upsets around the country before turning his attention to A&M's battle with No. 8 Notre Dame.
11 days ago by
Kay Naegeli
Post Game Review: No. 19 Texas A&M 44, Utah State 22
No. 19 Texas A&M's offense racked up 554 yards in a 44-22 victory over Utah State in front of 100,026 at Kyle Field on Saturday. However, there is some cause for concern as quarterback Marcel Reed left with an apparent injury in the third quarter and did not return.
16 days ago by
Olin Buchanan
Elko credits A&M's improved special teams play to heightened buy-in
While KC Concepcion was the one carrying it 80 yards to paydirt, the first Aggie punt return since 2023 for a touchdown was made by EJ Smith, who threw three different blocks on the play. Mike Elko praised Smith's blocking as one of the greatest effort plays he has ever seen.
29 days ago by
Olin Buchanan
Snippets from Day 16 of Texas A&M's fall practices
The Fightin' Texas Aggies are in their final week of Fall Camp as the season-opener with UTSA looms just 11 days away, but on Tuesday, Mike Elko & Co. held their 16th fall practice. Following the open portion of practice, Olin Buchanan discusses his key observations.
All Updates
9/9/2025
Offense in Review feat. Stephen McGee: Texas A&M 44, Utah State 22
9/8/2025
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Live (Monday, September 8)
4/21/2025
Lunch with Liucci: Billy Liucci joins TexAgs Live (Monday, April 21)
4/3/2025
Reed Between The Lines: Moss uses ball to improve the lives of his sons
1/8/2025
Recruiting Country: The latest recruiting news surrounding the Maroon & White
×
TexAgs National Average Rating
The TexAgs National Average Rating is a proprietary formula that calculates an
industry-wide aggregate rating for each recruiting prospect. The formula includes
publicly listed grades, scores, ratings and rankings by national recruiting services,
along with a TexAgs rating. Combining the data provides a rating for each prospect,
which is then normalized to fit the TexAgs Rating 100-point scale.
The intent of this rating is to provide TexAgs readers with a comprehensive snapshot of
how individual prospects rank nationally.
×
TexAgs Rating
The TexAgs Recruiting team of Billy Liucci, David Sandhop, Jason Howell, Ryan Brauninger
and a host of recruiting interns attends more than 75 games each fall and observes and
evaluates every major Texas A&M target, as well as most of the top 150 prospects in the State of Texas.
From this evaluation the team draws a rating for each prospect on a scale between 70 and 100.
99-100: Elite national prospect (Five-star)
Considered one of the best prospects in the nation and a likely difference-maker
at the collegiate level. Displays all of the physical skills to be a future All-American
with potential to be an early-round NFL draft pick.
90-98: Elite state prospect (Four-star)
Considered one of the best 30-40 prospects in the state and a top 250
national prospect. Displays the physical skills to be a major early contributor
at the collegiate level with high professional potential.
80-89: Quality prospect (Three-star)
Considered one of the best 100 prospects in the state and a top 500 national prospect.
Displays the physical skills to develop into a contributor over the course of his college career.
Has the ability to become a professional prospect over time with development.
70-79: Solid prospect (Two-star)
Considered one of the top 250 prospects in the state. Has the physical skills to be a potential
contributor at a D-1 program over the course of his collegiate career with significant development.
Professional potential is low.