What does the Moses eviction mean for Bonfire 2007?

3,506 Views | 58 Replies | Last: 18 yr ago by WillD
commando2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess the situation will be much like the loss of Hotard in 2005, with the crew disbanded, but some of the old residents returning under different-colored pots.

But what about the new Moses residents, the class of '11? Wouldn't it be great if they got involved?
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just because the RAB's can't officially LIVE there...I don't see them leaving well enough alone.

Let's see where they all move to...

my guess: then end up taking over a different dorm...
Predmid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Reslife has stated it will not allow a mass Moses migration. If they were to all try and move into Mosher for example, many would be flat out rejected and placed somewhere else.
Waltonloads08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
they will come back and teach the new kids, ill bet. you cant just ban them all from doing this either, it's still a free country
yeahtoast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That dorm will always belong to us, regardless of who "officially" has a card to get into it.

Lord help the poor freshman girls that get shoehorned into Moses next year...



"And even now the axe is laid to the root of the trees. therefore every tree which does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." -Matthew 3:10
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
and what is it you plan on doing to these poor girls?
HOGS LEW
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It will probably involve a pumpkin.
AggieRAB05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fries, how did old Moses hold up after they made the single rooms? I just don't see it holding up anymore, stick a fork in it this dorm is done.

An old fart wants to know, I lived down the hall from you for a while, my intials from your old roomate P.D.
WH08PsyJayci
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
That dorm will always belong to us, regardless of who "officially" has a card to get into it.


i'm pretty sure that's the mentality that got all of you "red ass *******s" kicked out in the first place. it may need some revision.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh snap. intra-organizational ownage there.

You guys...blaming this on anybody but yourselves is absurd, and the sooner you realize that the better. By you guys I'm largely referring to nearly all residents of Moses, but the blame doesn't end there.

That is all.

[This message has been edited by SquareOne07 (edited 3/1/2007 9:36a).]
COKEMAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tell ya what, go ahead and re-take "your" dorm and all of that inane nonsense. But don't you dare do it waving the "we are Bonfire" flag and expect some kind of grand reception. I'll personally see the Moses line end as far as SB is concerned and further if I can manage it. Threats like that are just plain dumb and borderline criminal.

Bonfire may have been the catalyst that got the Moses thing rolling long ago, but even if Bonfire wasn't around anymore, I suspect you guys would still be tearing up your rooms and screwing pumpkins. Accept responsibility for your actions and move on.

Moses isn't the first dorm to be "disbanded" and it won't be the last. I'm sorry you are being separated from your friends, but if you cannot remain friends with them without being so close, then you aren't really friends at all.

What does it mean for Bonfire? Well, we could finally test the Moses assertion that "Bonfire can't survive without us." What would be even better is if some of the more level-headed guys in the dorm realize that Bonfire is a privilege and NOT a right. And with that knowledge and the desire to continue participating, they spread the word about all that Bonfire is in their new dorms, sans pumpkins and destruction.

Scott Coker '92

[This message has been edited by COKEMAN (edited 3/1/2007 10:43a).]
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
well said. this place is starting to smell of rationality.

I like it.
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
But don't you dare do it waving the "we are Bonfire" flag and expect some kind of grand reception.


yes, leave Bonfire out of it...it is a personal/campus issue.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
shouldn't the root cause be examined as well?

Not to say bonfire is the sole reason for such behavior, does it contribute at all?
dutch_chicken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
shouldn't the root cause be examined as well?

Not to say bonfire is the sole reason for such behavior, does it contribute at all?



No.

When DG was evicted en masse they were pulling pretty large numbers for Bonfire, but the entire dorm wasn't showing up. The majority of the dorm was participating in the @$$h0lery that got them evicted.

Walton E-Ramp was evicted as a whole a year or two later. I do not believe the entire ramp was participating in Bonfire, either.

The most likely cause is that a bunch of guys who, for the first times in their lives, didn't have any parental guidance starting acting like idiots. I'm pretty sure that if you read the news you'll hear stories of this type of thing happening at college campuses acrosss the country. Many are part of fraternities or sports teams. I am pretty sure that none of those guys participated in or are in any way affiliated with Bonfire.

Root causes: Testosterone, immaturity and probably some alcohol (or something).
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
so the dorms pulling the largest numbers for bonfire are the ones causing great amounts of trouble...

and "no" the root cause of the problem should not be examined?

How narrow minded and short sided can you possibly be? Very rarely do people botch a rhetorical question, but you did. THE ROOT CAUSE SHOULD ALWAYS BE EXAMINED. I hope that helps.

Bonfire encourages *******ry and immaturity...in case you haven't noticed. Open your eyes buddy, this is an excellent opportunity to actually have somebody else recognize your problems and fix them for you...instead...as is par for the course, you seem to be pawning them off on something else.

"It's not bonfire, it's the fact that they are 18 and 19 year old males"

Guess what? This university has THOUSANDS of of 18 and 19 year old young men who are NOT destroying campus property, wasting other people's money and acting like totall *******s. The more you deny it, the more foolish you look. The sooner you recognize the common trend in such behaviors, the sooner such behavior can be fixed.

The denial and naivity is mind numbing and almost nausiating. Wake up!
dutch_chicken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So we're not playing nice anymore, huh. That's a shame. I thought you considered yourself above that. I guess I was wrong.

Well I botched the quote, maybe, but not the question. Of course root causes should be examined. That is why I did so in my post.

Let me do this again for you, since you missed it the first time:

quote:
shouldn't the root cause be examined as well?


Sure, why not. See my discussion of root causes. It will follow my deflection of the blame you are attempting to throw at Bonfire.

quote:
Not to say bonfire is the sole reason for such behavior, does it contribute at all?


No. (See, that is the question the "No" is answering).

When DG was evicted en masse they were pulling pretty large numbers for Bonfire, but the entire dorm wasn't showing up. The majority of the dorm was participating in the @$$h0lery that got them evicted.

Walton E-Ramp was evicted as a whole a year or two later. I do not believe the entire ramp was participating in Bonfire, either.

The most likely cause is that a bunch of guys who, for the first times in their lives, didn't have any parental guidance starting acting like idiots. I'm pretty sure that if you read the news you'll hear stories of this type of thing happening at college campuses across the country. Many are part of fraternities or sports teams. I am pretty sure that none of those guys participated in or are in any way affiliated with Bonfire.

Root causes: Testosterone, immaturity and probably some alcohol (or something).


Is that clear enough for you?

By the way, calling me (not my argument) narrow-minded and short-sighted is an ad hominem attack. I thought you didn't do that. Huh. I guess you do.

Also, as you often accuse others of doing, you don't address my points; you only focus on the ones that, in your mind, support your already-formed notion of what Bonfire is. You never address any of what I said regarding a group of 18-19 year olds with no supervision who live/work/play in close quarters. This is a trend across America. The @$$hats that put themselves in a bad situation at Duke did not have Bonfire. The fraternities killing pledges at schools across the nation did not have Bonfire. The legal and school troubles that football players everywhere get into are not caused by Bonfire. You are once again getting into a post hoc ergo propter hoc argument. I thought you were smarter than that. I guess not.

Let me try to put this in a way you can understand . . . . David Duke us a racist ******* who calls himself a Republican. I can point out any number of other people I know who are racists and also Republicans. Did being Republican make them racist? No, I am a Republican (actually more of a libertarian) and not a racist. So, to help you out here . . . did being in Bonfire make them immature, stupid and destructive? No.

The root cause is not Bonfire. Wake up! Bonfire may be a catalyst, but it is not the cause. If it were there would have been many more examples of this type of behavior in the 90+ years that Bonfire has been around. There are a few individuals that are involved in Bonfire who fit the image in your mind, and maybe things have gotten worse since ’99, but to say that it is Bonfire that is the root cause is . . . . well, idiotic.

*edited for incorrect word usage

[This message has been edited by Kip95 (edited 3/2/2007 12:59p).]
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wow...

[] I didn't think my opinion of you could drop anymore, but alas...I was wrong.

the "no" was for the second question...not the first.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
yikes...something awful must have happened to you last night, you're so much more angry than usual, but that's ok.

You stated the root causes for such behavior as the 19 year olds away from their parents, but how do you account for the other thousands of kids in the same situation in this university who are not dragging in dead deer and throwing bowling balls through windows?

I'm not saying bonfire is THE cause of such behavior, I'm saying it is A cause. And as a matter of fact, I had an interview this morning with a Schumacher Chief from some time back who is now in an excellent managerial position. We discussed this very matter. He in fact said that a lot of what happened back when he was here and the death sentence recently handed down had something if not a lot to do with the current bonfire. I'm saying that ASB's give the finger to the man attitude certainly contributes to 19 year olds doing the things they did in the dorm.

Just because I say something negative about you does not make it an attack, quit playing the victim. I'm sorry if me calling you narrow minded and short sided hurts your feelings, it really shouldn't, and if it does, you better get some thicker skin.

I addressed your point about the lack of supervision.
quote:
"It's not bonfire, it's the fact that they are 18 and 19 year old males"

Guess what? This university has THOUSANDS of of 18 and 19 year old young men who are NOT destroying campus property, wasting other people's money and acting like totall *******s.

Didn't I? You said it had to do with young men being away from home, and I said that's absurd, and I told you why.

Again, I didn't say bonfire was THE root cause, perhaps a little more reading is in order.

And geez, you guys should really relax, it's a beutiful Friday, pull that stick out and go do something besides vent your rage towards somebody who has a different opinion. You guys have never angered me and I don't think less of you as individuals, and I'm sorry CONVERSATION on a website has the ability to affect you guys in the way it does.

Cheers!
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
-.-

crafish anyone?

Just because some 18-21 year olds are capable of maturity, doesn't mean that they all are...

Bicycles ended up in trees back when I lived in Aston in 2001...based on your theory []...how did this happen?

[This message has been edited by TexasRebel (edited 3/2/2007 2:31p).]
dutch_chicken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
*This post should be read in its entirety in a conversational, even-tempered, yet slightly sardonic tone of voice*

quote:
yikes...something awful must have happened to you last night, you're so much more angry than usual, but that's ok.
Nope, nothing awful. Nice quiet night home with the family. I even got the chance to watch a little TV after the kiddo went to bed. There wasn’t even any anger involved in my post. Try reading it again with a disappointed and slightly weary tone of voice. That would be more accurate. What turned your b!t<h factor up to 11?

quote:
You stated the root causes for such behavior as the 19 year olds away from their parents, but how do you account for the other thousands of kids in the same situation in this university who are not dragging in dead deer and throwing bowling balls through windows?
I pointed out that this type of behavior takes place on campuses across the nation. The uniting factor is 18-21 year olds with no adult supervision. Bonfire exists on only one campus (in a manner of speaking). How do you account for similar behavior on a wide variety of campuses? You are asking about root causes. Bonfire can not be the root cause because it exists in only one place whereas the behavior is nationwide. Despite your desire for everyone to be as smart and responsible and worldly and wise as you (/sarcasm), people are all different. I account for the “thousands of kids” by saying that some people are dumber than others; some are less responsible than others. Bonfire didn’t make the folks from Moses act that way . . . they chose to act that way themselves.

quote:
I'm not saying bonfire is THE cause of such behavior, I'm saying it is A cause. And as a matter of fact, I had an interview this morning with a Schumacher Chief from some time back who is now in an excellent managerial position. We discussed this very matter. He in fact said that a lot of what happened back when he was here and the death sentence recently handed down had something if not a lot to do with the current bonfire. I'm saying that ASB's give the finger to the man attitude certainly contributes to 19 year olds doing the things they did in the dorm.
What causes that attitude? Bonfire? Or being 19 and therefore knowing all you need to know? I know a lot of folks with that attitude who have never even seen Bonfire. Once again, Bonfire is not a cause, perhaps a catalyst, perhaps a rallying point, but not a cause. The people who make up Bonfire create the culture; the culture does not create the people in Bonfire. In other words, the people who trashed Moses would have acted that way with or without Bonfire.

I could just as easily blame the current state of TAMU as a whole, our society, or whatever group, big or small, on the sense of entitlement I see coming from the spoiled-rotten “youth of today.” You are a prime example of this. You have this, “I know it all and you are all idiots because you do not agree with me” attitude. From my perspective the lot of you could use a spanking. The fact is I was probably a lot like that when I was in college, too. It’s part of growing up.

quote:
Just because I say something negative about you does not make it an attack, quit playing the victim. I'm sorry if me calling you narrow minded and short sided hurts your feelings, it really shouldn't, and if it does, you better get some thicker skin.
Actually, it didn’t bother me in the least. Trust me; no part of my sense of self is taken from the internet. I was just pointing out your tendency to attack the person, not the argument. If you don’t want to think of it as an ad hominem attack, that’s your prerogative. If you are going to be wrong, be boldly wrong, little buddy.

quote:
I addressed your point about the lack of supervision.
quote:
________________________________________
"It's not bonfire, it's the fact that they are 18 and 19 year old males"

Guess what? This university has THOUSANDS of of 18 and 19 year old young men who are NOT destroying campus property, wasting other people's money and acting like totall *******s.
________________________________________

Didn't I? You said it had to do with young men being away from home, and I said that's absurd, and I told you why.
No, you didn’t tell me why. You tried to point out a trend on a small scale, ignoring the larger-scale trend I pointed out. I run into people like you all the time in my line of work. You can prove anything you want through technical financial analysis. If the data from this time-scale doesn’t fit, just keep shrinking or expanding it until it does.

quote:
Again, I didn't say bonfire was THE root cause, perhaps a little more reading is in order.
I read just fine, thank you. You might want to try a little of it yourself.

quote:
And geez, you guys should really relax, it's a beutiful Friday, pull that stick out and go do something besides vent your rage towards somebody who has a different opinion. You guys have never angered me and I don't think less of you as individuals, and I'm sorry CONVERSATION on a website has the ability to affect you guys in the way it does.
Go on, rub it in. I’m stuck on the 20th floor in a corner office with a great view of Houston. I should be playing golf today.

Different opinions are fine, overblown egos are an annoyance.
Waltonloads08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Walton E-Ramp



E-vil E! Give us a room! A! WHOOP!
Waltonloads08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Reslife has stated it will not allow a mass Moses migration. If they were to all try and move into Mosher for example, many would be flat out rejected and placed somewhere else.



isn't Mosher a chick hall?

TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are all co-ed now >.<
commando2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
isn't Mosher a chick hall?


They made it co-ed last year, along with Neeley.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kip, you're funny, I'm drunk. That is all. You crack me up with your attempts to get to me. You don't, that probably bothers you. Oh well. Night kids.

Ha.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Now that I'm more sober, you still whine a lot and get all worked up over postings on texags. That's pretty lame, don't you have a wife and family? I hope you're a little more calm and rational when it comes to that. As far as bonfire discussions on texags.com...yeah...yeah probably best not to take things too hard there Kip.

All I know though Kip...for some reason differing viewpoints really chew you up, and I hope that outside of texags, you're a little more receptive to critisism and other viewpoints. I'm done with you though, I think if I kept talking you're head might explode and you'd go nuts. Go enjoy the day and you're family and stop getting all worked up over me.
RealDeal022
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Bonfire outlawed Members Only jackets in 1986 so clearly these ruffians are not affiliated.


[This message has been edited by RealDeal022 (edited 3/3/2007 10:57p).]
commando2004
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Bicycles ended up in trees back when I lived in Aston in 2001...based on your theory []...how did this happen?


Excellent question. A lot of folks here talk as if the years 2000 and 2001 got erased from history. But I remember those days, and know that Aggies were perfectly capable of acting like idiots even without Bonfire.
TexasRebel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
non northside "Aggies" at that...
DoctorSnoball
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel it is an ignorant, convoluted, and pompous means of making a point in debate, despite its purely objective nature, but here it is: Websters defines...

CAUSE:
Main Entry: 1cause
Pronunciation: \ˈkȯz\
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin causa
Date: 13th century
1 a: a reason for an action or condition : motive b: something that brings about an effect or a result c: a person or thing that is the occasion of an action or state; especially : an agent that brings something about d: sufficient reason <discharged for cause>
2 a: a ground of legal action b: case
3: a matter or question to be decided
4 a: a principle or movement militantly defended or supported b: a charitable undertaking <for a good cause>
— cause·less \-ləs\ adjective

Main Entry: 2cause
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Form(s): caused; caus·ing
Date: 14th century
1 : to serve as a cause or occasion of <cause an accident>
2 : to compel by command, authority, or force <caused him to resign>
— caus·er noun


CATALYST
Main Entry: cat·a·lyst
Pronunciation: \ˈka-tə-ləst\
Function: noun
Date: 1902
1 : a substance that enables a chemical reaction to proceed at a usually faster rate or under different conditions (as at a lower temperature) than otherwise possible
2 : an agent that provokes or speeds significant change or action



With that said, Bonfire can technically be a little of both a cause and a catalyst. While in my opinion it always has the potential to represent a catalyst for poor/ignorant/destructive activity because it does provide a means for irresponsibility and is based in well... at the very core destruction. (We chop down a small forest and start a huge fire... hello) Typically all people have destructive tendecies, but the respect for proper order, other people's property, and social accord limit this impulse. When you provide means to give into this impulse be it a prep rally car smash or whatever, people will cave. Guidance and strong leadership limit the extent of how far you take it, especially in Bonfire.

As for being a cause, if a person would rather not do something, but feels pressured to because of some circumstance or event, they are "caused" to do it or they accept the consequences. Meaning, if you feel like leadership in Bonfire is poor or irresponsible, be it dorm-wise (official or unofficial, meaning appointed chiefs or just random upperclassmen) or all the way to the top, then you will feel it is a cause. (They make these kids be destructive to fit in) If you feel Bonfire leadership does a good job at limiting inappropriate behavior, then Bonfire appears merely a catalyst and a forum for this destructive impulse we all share, which also doesn't have to happen on site (Ex. shiite Moses pulls).

I personally feel it is a catalyst and support the notion that it does happen all across the country and even all across campus. Vandalism and "hi-jinks" happen all across campus and off campus. My roommates throw bottles, fruit, tools, and even furniture off our 3rd story balcony and I often plead them to stop, and I am the only one who is even remotely related to Bonfire. They just wait till I leave or am not looking then, CRASH. Simply put, people like effing shiite up every once in a while, it is hard-wired into us. Bonfire kills trees, kids destroy the rest.
preshy boy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This might damper some thoughts on here, but....



How many current Moses residents participated in ASB 2006? How many residents live in Moses this year?
dutch_chicken
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quote:
Now that I'm more sober, you still whine a lot and get all worked up over postings on texags. That's pretty lame, don't you have a wife and family? I hope you're a little more calm and rational when it comes to that. As far as bonfire discussions on texags.com...yeah...yeah probably best not to take things too hard there Kip.

All I know though Kip...for some reason differing viewpoints really chew you up, and I hope that outside of texags, you're a little more receptive to critisism and other viewpoints. I'm done with you though, I think if I kept talking you're head might explode and you'd go nuts. Go enjoy the day and you're family and stop getting all worked up over me.
Oh, and I thought we were having a conversation. Apparently disagreement always sounds like whining in your book. That's really sad.

L7, you really do have an undeservedly high opinion of yourself, don't you? OK, you win. You are done with me. I will go back to my wife and kid (even though my posts tend to take place at lunch, and when taking a break from studying; but whatever, I am obviously a terrible father and husband).

But you still haven't addressed my post. I guess it is just easier to attack and dismiss than it is to actually discuss, huh?

Good day to you, sir.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah...it's sad.

Me and my opinion of myself are quite where they should be.

I never said anything to imply that you're a terrible husband and father, and that's a pretty dick thing of you to say, to be frank. That's rough that you resorted to that to give the impression I would even say such a thing. Weak.

Good day.

[This message has been edited by SquareOne07 (edited 3/5/2007 1:16a).]
Curly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Preshy, I didn't see more than 10 Moses guys out there at one time. I could be wrong but thats all I saw
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.