Sapper Redux said:
Quo Vadis? said:
Sapper Redux said:
Quo Vadis? said:
Sapper Redux said:
The vast majorities of her writings encouraged Jews to come to America. And modern Christian Zionism is quite far apart from the debates about Zionism in the late 19th century. So why did you begin your attacks on her by calling her a Zionist? What was the point of that?
You don't see an issue with allegiances for a person that is demanding a homeland for Jews, but encouraging immigrants from all over the place to come to the USA?
Demanding? She wanted a homeland for Jews, who were undergoing vicious pogroms, but was far more invested in encouraging Jewish immigration to the United States and viewed the country as a refuge for the oppressed where they could thrive. Why do you bring up "allegiances"? What are you insinuating?
Do poor huddled masses, or wretched refuse sound like a boon to the country that takes them or the poor huddled masses themselves?
Both. What are you insinuating with "allegiances"?
I'm not insinuating anything I'm saying she cares more about the benefit of the migrants than she does the United States.
I get it. I care more about the Catholic Church than I do America, however my allegiance to the Catholic Church does not put me into the position where I'm having to argue about importing a few hundred thousand impoverished migrants from the Vatican.
Edit to add; if you think "poor huddled masses and wretched refuse" are pitched as a boon to the country that accepts them it explains why you went into education and not advertising.