Why are the additions to Esther apocrypha, but not Esther itself?

799 Views | 2 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by BonfireNerd04
Martin Q. Blank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Esther doesn't seem that "Biblical". No mention of God. Story of revenge. It's more of a historical telling of how the holiday of Purim originated. It seems similar to the other apocrypha books. Only book not found in the dead sea scrolls. When and why was it included in the scriptural canon?
codker92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Martin Q. Blank said:

Esther doesn't seem that "Biblical". No mention of God. Story of revenge. It's more of a historical telling of how the holiday of Purim originated. It seems similar to the other apocrypha books. Only book not found in the dead sea scrolls. When and why was it included in the scriptural canon?


Pesherim commentaries on the text of Esther were at Qumran, among the Dead Sea scrolls. The Esther text does some interesting stuff in the original Hebrew, such as mystically interpreting the Persian Kings palace as God's new temple. The text foretells the destruction of both the first and second temple, which hints at the fall of Persia.
BonfireNerd04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Jewish sages canonized it some time in the Second Temple period.

The lack of any explicit mention of God or prophecy was a point of controversy.

OTOH, Purim was already a major festival. And the Rabbis interpreted the book as a case of Divine providence operating behind the scenes.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.