Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

8,349,351 Views | 50408 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Secolobo
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
fasthorse05 said:

I've got to put this one out there.

However, there's a caveat on who's doing the podcast.

I love Lara Logan. She's a huge believer in freedom and liberty and was, at one time, a hell of a reporter. I still think she's an outstanding reporter, but, she's old and probably doesn't bring the truth every single time. Not because she's doesn't have the same vitriol for corruption, I don't believe she's as competent as she used to be. However, I do believe the majority of this is accurate and truthful, I suggest you figure out which statements are the real deal.

Besides, there's a lot of good stuff in here about Smartmatic, but it's possible Hawg may know more than this podcast divulges. I've been well aware of the SOB from Venuzuela who ran the Tarrant County elections for years. BTW, even if Logan has lost a little shine, it doesn't mean the guests she has on don't bring the goods.

Enjoy!

Quote:

Quote:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/0RFHbSHZoJtA5ZlKeq64EO?si=e4832091527e426e




BTW, this podcast was the very first time I'd heard of Casa del Sol, which is apparently the cartel of all of the cartels. Once you're 50% of the way through this interview, Trump going into Venezuela will make 100% senses. It's not drug or oil related.


This interview of Svetlana Lokhova by Lara Logan from last week is very on topic for this thread. I did not realize that she had been unwittingly groomed to play the part of honeypot to take out Michael Flynn since back in 2015. She was set up by her professor at Cambridge, Christopher Andrew, who was MI5.

Ep 58 | Going Rogue with Lara Logan https://www.podbean.com/ea/pb-e97u8-1a282b2

Lokhova has read every document and can recite every detail and explain the connections. It is really impressive how she is able to lay out the sequence of several key events that happened on the same or successive days and illuminate the reason. You can see the conspiracy being spun in real time.

Lokhova is very smart and understands in hindsight that if you have a "chance meeting" with someone who is a senior IC member, it wasn't a chance meeting and to never be outside the presence of a corroborating third party witness.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
She's a good follow, but is so active on X I can't really do it, as it is just too many posts.

She's probably right about this suit also;
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not astounding, but Mitchell delivers accurate information.

Quote:

(2) Cleta Mitchell on X: "And here's the REAL kicker about the 2020 Fulton County absentee ballots: 148,319 absentee ballots were counted in the 2020 General Election from Fulton County… but only 125,784 voters are recorded as casting an absentee ballot. There are 25,534 more ballots counted than" / X

Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
During the "recount" Richard Barron, Fulton County Election Official gave a presser on the progress of the "recount." In that presser, he said they had "adjudicated" over 140,000 ballots. I was just getting started on my deep dive into Dominion and their systems (websites were useful) and that term has a very specific meaning and special procedure. It is used to duplicate mainly spoiled ballots that the scanners cannot read for some reason.

More notably, during that process it is very easy to flip votes and if the original image is deleted (as what happened here) no way to prove that. If the system logs are overwritten or otherwise damaged unable to tell even when that second ballot image was created and which process was employed.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It takes a huge number of people involved to arrange for voter fraud at the voting booth or ballot mailing to generate enough votes to swing an election reliably.

It takes only a tiny number of people involved to manipulate the counting and tallying process and it is much easier to arrange the necessary outcome and cover tracks. Any modern voter fraud isn't in the voting, it is in the counting.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

It takes a huge number of people involved to arrange for voter fraud at the voting booth or ballot mailing to generate enough votes to swing an election reliably.

It takes only a tiny number of people involved to manipulate the counting and tallying process and it is much easier to arrange the necessary outcome and cover tracks. Any modern voter fraud isn't in the voting, it is in the counting.

As long as you include the decision to count questionable ballots, I agree.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If I recall correctly, if the reader couldn't decide who/what you voted for it had to be adjudicated. And at adjudication the person could literally put whatever they wanted. So if you put a check mark by Donald Trump, the person doing the adjudication could put Biden. There were supposed to be watchers or whatever at each adjudication area, but not sure if that was the case.

Also, I think after the adjudication a new ballot is printed and the old ballot image was either erased or replaced with the new.
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Refresh
Page 1441 of 1441
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.