***Russian - Ukraine War Tactical and Strategic Updates*** [Warning on OP]

9,983,275 Views | 53981 Replies | Last: 12 min ago by Rossticus
EMY92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're winged aircraft. they're not like a quad-copter. It's more like a small plane loaded with explosives.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks. Hard for me to keep up with this rapid change in drone technology.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waffledynamics said:

For the 5,000th time, Russia will not use a nuke. It has way, way, way more to lose if it does that.
I tend to agree. However, Putin & his military aren't rational. Could you clarify what more could they lose. Are you implying there would be a nuclear response against Russia?
Claude!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Thanks. Hard for me to keep up with this rapid change in drone technology.

Fortunately, the same goes for Russia.
PJYoung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

Waffledynamics said:

For the 5,000th time, Russia will not use a nuke. It has way, way, way more to lose if it does that.

I tend to agree. However, Putin & his military aren't rational. Could you clarify what more could they lose. Are you implying there would be a nuclear response against Russia?


NATO/Western conventional retaliation: U.S. and NATO officials have warned of "catastrophic consequences." Likely responses include massive conventional strikes on Russian forces in Ukraine (e.g., destroying the Black Sea Fleet, air defenses, supply lines, and command nodes) without necessarily crossing into Russian territory or using nukes. Former officials like David Petraeus have suggested responses that could "destroy" exposed Russian troops.


No guaranteed military victory: A nuke might create a contaminated zone (I would add the contaminated zone would include some of Russia since prevailing winds blow in that direction) or terrorize civilians, but Ukraine's resolve has proven extremely high. It could harden Ukrainian and Western determination rather than force surrender. Russia would still face insurgency, occupation costs, and a more united opposition.

Global pariah status: Russia would become far more isolated than after 2022. Even current partners like China and India (who oppose nuclear proliferation and instability) could distance themselves or reduce support, as nuclear use threatens their interests.

Loss of neutral or sympathetic voices: Many Global South countries that have stayed neutral or criticized Western sanctions would likely condemn Russia strongly.

Regime stability: Putin's domestic narrative relies on "special military operation" framing and avoiding existential risks. A nuke could signal desperation, erode elite/military support if it backfires, and invite internal challenges.

  • Supercharged sanctions: Current sanctions already hurt. Nuclear use would trigger far harsher, broader measuressecondary sanctions on banks, energy buyers, and enablers; potential oil export bans; SWIFT exclusions for more entities; and asset seizures.
  • Trade collapse: Even China might curtail some dealings to avoid secondary sanctions and global fallout. Energy revenues (Russia's lifeline) would plummet further.
  • Long-term stagnation: Russia would face deeper technological isolation, capital flight, and brain drain. Reconstruction or recovery would become nearly impossible under sustained pressure.
  • Undermining its own nuclear deterrent value: Breaking the taboo weakens the "nuclear weapons have not been used since 1945" norm, which benefits Russia as a nuclear power. It could accelerate proliferation elsewhere and justify stronger Western countermeasures.
  • Strengthened NATO and Western unity: It would likely boost European defense spending, U.S. commitment (or pressure for it), and Ukrainian aidopposite of Russia's goal of dividing the West.

    Environmental and humanitarian blowback: Radiation would affect Russian-border regions, occupied territories, and potentially allies/neutrals, causing long-term health, agricultural, and political costs. Russia would own the legacy of first nuclear use in war since 1945.
  • PJYoung
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    lololol



    Ukrainian services needed only 5 days to carry out an attack on the facility shown in the report, which was a "hero" of Russian television.

    On June 21, Russian TV aired a report in the Vesti program. It showcased the behind-the-scenes work of the secret, strategic arms enterprise Titan-Barrikady in Volgograd.

    Employees spoke on camera about unique, modern lathes and specialized machines imported from South Korea, the Czech Republic, or Italy. Journalists displayed the interiors of production halls, making it easier for Ukrainian analysts (including those from the InformNapalm group) to precisely locate key machines within the factory's structure.

    And already on June 27, the SZU carried out a strike with FP-5 Flamingo cruise missiles on the facility presented in the report. Of the five missiles launched, at least three struck targets directly within the complex.

    According to analyses of satellite images from July 1, it was precisely those halls containing the unique machine park that were destroyed.
    EastSideAg2002
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    [Do not post material that bypasses obscenity filters -- Staff]
    CS78
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    I dont really see those things happening though. More likely, everyone would become too chicken chit to do anything, real quickly.

    The reason Putin has not and will not give up, as long as he's in charge, is because he isnt fighting for Ukraine at this point, he's fighting for future respect/ influence in his region and the world. Notice how Belarus, Kazak, etc have started to tell him no when that would have never happened pre-war. That's what he's fighting for. Political influence on the world stage for the next 50 years. He'll do whatever he feels is most likely to reestablish the clout that has been lost. Even if that means killing millions of his own.

    I suspect this is what he told Trump in their meetings and Trump believed him.
    PJYoung
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG


    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Just realized that all that rubble is half covering a playground.
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Ag with kids
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    fullback44 said:

    GAC06 said:

    Rossticus said:




    That's a big development if true

    What exactly does this mean for some of us non tech savvy people ?

    Can't jam or spoof it.

    It's basically using inertial navigation (it knew where it started and can calculate where it's at) combined with video inputs sent to a computer algorithm that can give it information about where it's at to help update the inertial navigation.
    You can turn off signatures, btw
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?


    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?

    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Ag with kids
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Rossticus said:



    JFC...

    4 years in, and the Russians can't even take a bunch of farmland...
    You can turn off signatures, btw
    shiftyandquick
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Putin has increased his personal security detail. Feeling the heat. What it must feel like to know that your enemies are circling you waiting for the kill shot. Which will inevitably come. He will not pass of natural causes.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2026/07/01/paranoid-putin-increases-personal-security-to-800-officers/
    jbeaman88
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Great interview by Preston Stewart covering several interesting topics on advancements by Ukraine in FPV and UGV drones, among other platforms. Well worth a listen if you have the time:
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?


    "Update of the table of Ukrainian separate artillery brigades.

    For a year, we have observed the same trends:

    Increase in the mass of systems, which has resulted in the creation of eight additional ABs with the objective achieved of one AB per army corps.

    Greater standardization with the presence of the 2S22 in 18 of the ABs and a gradual disappearance of old Soviet systems (except for the BM-21), particularly the 2A36 Giatsint-B, whose conversion to 2P22 Bohdana-BG has accelerated.

    The CAESArs now represent the 2nd largest group (110-120) among self-propelled systems, present in three ABs."
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    PJYoung
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG


    We have an immediate upgrade to the intelligence map! The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) has officially broken its silence, confirming a highly successful twin-strike operation targeting two major Russian airfields in occupied Crimea overnight.

    The SBU's operational breakdown confirms devastating infrastructure and hardware losses for Moscow:

    Saky Airbase Hammered Again: Hit for the second time this week, the Saky installation suffered catastrophic losses. At least 7 Russian combat jets (including Su-30SM, Su-30, and Su-24 variants) are confirmed as either heavily damaged or entirely destroyed inside their hangars.

    Hvardiyske Airbase Engulfed: Simultaneously, Ukrainian long-range capabilities neutralized the Hvardiyske airbase, completely leveling 2 tactical hangars filled with Shahed kamikaze drones and specialized aviation maintenance equipment.

    My take:This is a comprehensive, multi-dimensional tightening of the noose around Crimea. Ukraine isn't just paralyzing heavy military rail logistics by blacking out electrical substationsthey are systematically blinding and grounding the Russian Aerospace Forces on the peninsula. By liquidating these multi-million dollar jets and burning through Russia's frontline drone reserves, Kyiv is stripping the occupiers of their operational leverage.
    The SBU isn't asking for permissionthey are kicking the door wide open. The clock is ticking, Putin's airfields are burning, and the defensive crust of the occupation is shattering!
    PJYoung
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG


    Waffledynamics
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Would be interesting to see corroboration. That just sounds too good to be true.
    Waffledynamics
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    Bulldog73
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    AG
    https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2026/07/03/nato-aware-of-alleged-russian-plan-to-launch-military-provocation-against-alliance-report/

    Russia is reportedly preparing a very limted incursion into Poland to convince NATO it needs to protect itself rather than arming Ukraine.
    Rossticus
    How long do you want to ignore this user?


    First Page
    Page 1542 of 1543
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.