Dems set their terms to dhs funding

3,379 Views | 51 Replies | Last: 15 hrs ago by B-1 83
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Im a hard no on at least 8, if not all of them.

Im sure the Republicans will give the dems everything they want
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I seem to remember when the patriot act and DHS were something everyone on this web site wanted disbanded b/c "spying on American's."
Maroon Dawn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah that's gonna be an absolute no. Any GOP that supports that is a Dem loving traitor to the Republic
Logos Stick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
America-hating ****bags. Republicans should pillory them.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anything the Rs agree to back up on needs to come with an agreement that only American citizens are counted in census for representation. Take away their sole reason for supporting these illegals. But too many Rs are uniparty so I expect to be disappointed and disgusted with the final agreement.
Psycho Bunny
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How about little spartacus boy and chucky go fan each other while listening to Yanni. That's about all they are good for.
Whether I get life's question right or wrong free will is an illusion.
Life is a game that plays us.
Are we dreaming of life or is life dreaming of us.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeffries and Schumer are gaslighting dirt bags. Most, if not all the claims they make in that list are pure bull****. That's a campaign manifesto, not a serious negotiating list.

It's abundantly clear that the Democrats are still going full bore to sell out this country and endanger American citizens in order to further their political interests.

Screw them.
AgDad121619
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also hypocritical as hell to watch all these paid agitators cover their face but demand DHS unmask and ID so the illegal protestors can doxx them and their families

Dems - how dare you use our tactics against us "
Cinco Ranch Aggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
How about no?

And
Martin Cash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

I seem to remember when the patriot act and DHS were something everyone on this web site wanted disbanded b/c "spying on American's."

Yeah. And?
JB99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Body Cams - yes. Would actually help law enforcement

I think officers should display an identity number. No on last names or removing face coverings. I would think you couldn't dox someone based upon an identity or badge number.

Some of the sensitive sites make sense like hospitals and schools

That's about it
javajaws
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not just no, but hell no. If republicans support any bit of this I'll never bother voting for one again.
jja79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who will be the first?
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Never negotiate with the enemy when youre in a place of strength
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That list basically defangs ICE and DHS. Basically says to all illegals that they have free rein to do whatever they please.

Of course that is the Dems objective
BusterAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My thoughts:

1) Require ICE to get a warrant to enter private property. Um, no.
1a) Require verification that a person is not a US citizen before holding them in immigration detention. Nope. Should be easy to prove you are a citizen if you are one.

2) No masks. Nope. ICE agents need protection from COVID too. COVID is the only reason they are wearing masks.

3) Require ID. This is fine. I actually agree with this. You don't need to stop what you are doing in order to show an ID, but you do need to show an ID if you claim to be ICE. But, ICE is already doing this anyways.

4) Prevent enforcement in sensitive locations - no ice enforcement in hospitals, courts or churches. Nope. Nothing wrong with ICE waiting outside a court room to nab illegals. I notice that Schumer is just fine with Don Lemon raiding a church, but not ICE. Interesting.

5) Stop racial profiling. This is stupid. I think that ICE should be able to use common sense.

6) Uphold Use of Force Standards. Agreed, because this is already in place.

7) Ensure State and Local Coordination and Oversight. Coordination, yes, oversight, no. This is federal law. You have made it very clear that local governments can't enforce federal law.

8) Build safeguards around detention. I agree. Illegal Aliens shouldn't be treated any worse than the Jan 6th protestors. If solitary confinement in sub-standard facilities with no charges filed, no bond provided, and no contact with the outside world is good enough for political prisoners of the Dem party that are citizens, it's good enough for illegal aliens.

9) Body camaras - you have to use body cameras to monitor ICE, but can't use body cameras as evidence to prosecute crime. Um, no.

10) No paramilitary police - bring them in line with civil enforcement. I'm OK with this. Most civil enforcement organizations have swat teams. Uniforms should be at least as normal as, for example, the Harris County Swat team.

Here is my counter-proposal:

1) Immediately deputize all state and all major city law enforcement departments so that they can enforce federal immigration law. Allow state and local government to detain illegal aliens the same way that federal LEOs can until their immigration court date.

2) Make it illegal for protestors that are breaking the law while protesting to wear masks. Wearing a mask during a protest while you break a law as minor as jaywalking is now an additional crime.

4) Protect sensitive areas. Make it illegal to fund any protestor or protest where significant illegal activities occur. If you pay a protestor to protest, and they trespass in a hospital, private business, or church, you are criminally liable. In exchange ICE agrees not to arrest illegals in courthouses, hospitals, churches, schools, etc, but they are free to wait outside. Add language to RICO laws around paid-for protests.

Seems fair.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Give them the body cams and tell them to **** off on everything else.
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:

Give them the body cams and tell them to **** off on everything else.


Don't give them **** and get more funding.
Old_Ag_91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No. Just no. They can take that and do something special with it.. I'm not getting banned.. but you know what I mean.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agracer said:

I seem to remember when the patriot act and DHS were something everyone on this web site wanted disbanded b/c "spying on American's."


I seem to remember reading in my political history books that the U.S. Customs Service was a stand alone office and the nations oldest federal law enforcement office established in the 1780s when the new nation had 3.9 million population.

After significant changes over its 237 year history it finds itself underneath the DHS. We didn't move it there but that's where it is now and we are talking about the activities of our nations first law enforcement agency, not its new department home.

If you want to talk about the merits of the DHS as a department, I suggest going to start a new thread. You will still find plenty of us willing to complain about the parts of the department that didn't exist in 1789.
FatZilla
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sure, you get all of those but you must agree to all of these. Prove their hypocrisy that it was never about the safety of American citizens that they want these new rules in place, it was always about keeping illegals in the country.

Amendment 1: DACA expunged along with all other protections for illegal aliens granting work authorization and legal stay in America
Amendment 2: All aliens illegally in the United States must self deport within 30 days
Amendment 3: Any alien that does not self depot is guilty of a federal trespassing crime and will be deported immediately with no habeas or other legal paths available
Amendment 4: Any illegal alien caught entering or re-entering the United States of America will be subject to a mandatory minimum sentence in Federal prison of 20 years with an additional 10 for every re-entry the alien is known to have committed. This includes visa and other temporary visa/authorization overstays after first deportation.
Amendment 5: SAVE act added in full
Amendment 6: Anchor babies are not granted citizenship and all prior are granted tempory residency but must complete green card or citizenship within 5 years of passage and must self deport if not completed.
Amendment 7: Anchor babies from Amendment 6 no longer granted the right to give expedited or temporary legal status for family members, all previously granted are hear by revoked and must self deport per Amendment 2.
Amendment 8: States and cities must accept and honor ICE detainers.
Amendment 9: Any officials at state or city level that do not honor the detainers are guilty of aiding and abetting an illegal alien and is subject to a minimum of 5 years in Federal prison and can never again hold a federal or state elected or public office position.
Amendment 10: Sanctuary Cities are illegal in any form or fashion. All lawmakers who approve of such a law will be guilty of a federal crime with a minimum sentence of 5 years and can never again hold a state or federal elected office.
Amendment 11: The Decennial Census must only count American Citizens for all appropriations it grants. Any alien not answering truthfully on a census questionnaire is guilty of a federal crime and subject to immediate deportation.
Amendment 12: English is now the only language recognized for all federal paperwork. No other language with will be provided. A translator may be hired at the requestors expense to attend any meeting or translate any documents. Mistranslation is not a valid defense against crimes committed by falsification of documents just as not knowing you are breaking the law is not a defense when breaking a law in any other fashion.
Amendment 13: e-verify will be enhanced and provided free to any business to use. All validation checks require a SSN or similar Alien identification number. If any id number is used more than 1 time to identify notably different individuals by provided characteristics such as first/last name, sex, ethnicity, eye color etc must be denied and immediately investigated so that the rightful owner can be identified. Any alien in possession of or providing fake/false credentials is subject to a federal crime with a minimum sentence of 10 years.
Amendment 14: All business must use e-verify for every employee. Any caught hiring without using or ignoring a response that credentials were invalid or likely false will be subject to an escalation fine of 10k for first offense followed by 100k per employee for every offense after. Any individual involved in the process of hiring tied to this alien that had proven/documented knowledge of the e-verify response is guilty of a federal crime with a minimum fine of 10k and minimum prison sentence of 6 months in Federal prison.
Gaeilge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TAMUallen said:

Gaeilge said:

Give them the body cams and tell them to **** off on everything else.


Don't give them **** and get more funding.


Body cams have exonerated more officers than they've convicted. They're a good insurance policy and an easy give considering they're standard with basically all local and state LEOs these days.

Body cams are a nothing burger. But regardless on what the DHS bill yields, tie the SAVE Act to it and I'll call it a win.
We fixed the keg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Perforate that, put it on a roll, and slap on a Charmin label. Your chance to weigh in with ideas was when the borders were open. Now that they are here, sit down, shut up, and let the executive branch that was elected to clean up the mess you created do their jobs.

ETA: Directed to the minority leaders, not the poster.
mjschiller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The democrat party and leadership on the national and state levels are anti-Americans and anti - Constitution. 99.9 % are marxists.
Iraq2xVeteran
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer are gaslighting lunatics. It's beyond clear that Democratic leaders are intentionally enabling illegal immigration to register them to become future Democratic voters. Also, most illegal aliens are trying to dismantle the American culture. For these reasons, the Democrats are the enemy of the country. Screw them all!
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gaeilge said:

TAMUallen said:

Gaeilge said:

Give them the body cams and tell them to **** off on everything else.


Don't give them **** and get more funding.


Body cams have exonerated more officers than they've convicted. They're a good insurance policy and an easy give considering they're standard with basically all local and state LEOs these days.

Body cams are a nothing burger. But regardless on what the DHS bill yields, tie the SAVE Act to it and I'll call it a win.


As I said, don't give them a thing. Why give up a good thing for no reward? You don't give them good things for nothing
Ozzy Osbourne
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Democrats want everything to go through their activist judges. How do we fix this broken system? What will it take to turn over these judges? Is impeachment the only option?
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
**** them! Never compromise with dems!
CDUB98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They can **** right off.
No Spin Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gaeilge said:

TAMUallen said:

Gaeilge said:

Give them the body cams and tell them to **** off on everything else.


Don't give them **** and get more funding.


Body cams have exonerated more officers than they've convicted. They're a good insurance policy and an easy give considering they're standard with basically all local and state LEOs these days.

Body cams are a nothing burger. But regardless on what the DHS bill yields, tie the SAVE Act to it and I'll call it a win.


I see no problem with body cams. Most police officers around the country already gave them. Like you said this is a nothing burger. Though, my buddy in BO said many on BP are hoping the body cams that were wearing don't show that they shouldn't have shot Pretti. They're not so much worried about the agents as how it'll look on the rest of the agents and agency if they were in the wrong.

Also, standardized uniforms don't seem like a big deal either.

I get the, "never an inch" mentality of those in here, but this is an election year where the dems might take back both the house and senate, so who knows how those on the right will vote if they think they might lose of they don't vote for some of these things.
There are in fact two things, science and opinion; the former begets knowledge, the later ignorance. Hippocrates
dmart90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
4, 5, and 10 are dumb. The rest are reasonable.
Pinochet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The sensitive places/home base bull**** needs to stop. We don't need to give people a place they can go to be able to break the law. That's like the driver who pulls into her drieway and then tells the cop "nu uh I was in my driveway you can't give me a ticket!"
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They at all dumb and republicans should reject each one
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Body cams are good and helped to mostly destroy the blm false narratives. Noem already said they were getting body cams

But, the dems arent asking simply that body cam be worn, they are essentially asking that they only be used to hold officers accountable and not for evidence gathering otherwise.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.