I support body cams. Dems can F right off on anything else. Rs are not winning midterms, Im sure Dems will push the remainder of the list after November.

Almost all of them boil down to "Let us gather data that allows the left to intimidate officers and give states the ability to override immigration policy".

It's already unconstitutional based on the state override of policy part. Hard pass on any of that.

It's always the democrats who make 'demands' as if they own the place. They don't. We do (supposedly) but we never make demands, nor do republicans.

Then, when their demands aren't met, nothing really happens except payback when they return to power.

List one single item the dems gave up when they had a majority with Biden /senate/ HOR 2020-2024? Rs are weak as **** as a group

Officers are generally fine with the cameras because something like 99.8% of the time, the cameras corroborate reports and justify and support actions and protect the offices from false or exaggerated allegations. The biased and spiteful progressive left presumed for years based off of hyperbolic anecdotal narrative that body cams would reveal widespread corruption and abuse but mostly they have revealed the public is full of criminal *******s that break the law and nearly all officers show remarkable restraint and professionalism.

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Body cams are good and helped to mostly destroy the blm false narratives. Noem already said they were getting body cams

But, the dems arent asking simply that body cam be worn, they are essentially asking that they only be used to hold officers accountable and not for evidence gathering otherwise.

---

Yeah, the footage of the cams need to be available to all sides period.

We shouldn't be giving in to terrorists.... and yet, there are just enough traitors that supposedly represent us, that will make it all happen

#9 (body cams) have already been agreed to and are being implemented based on what I've read.

No Spin Ag said:

---

Who?mikejones! said:

---

Body cams are good and helped to mostly destroy the blm false narratives. Noem already said they were getting body cams

But, the dems arent asking simply that body cam be worn, they are essentially asking that they only be used to hold officers accountable and not for evidence gathering otherwise.

---

Yeah, the footage of the cams need to be available to all sides period.

---

Privacy concerns (not officer privacy) make that unlikely to happen.

And Republicans want illegal immigrants to stop killing, hurting and raping U.S. citizens.

doubledog said:

---

And Republicans want illegal immigrants to stop killing, hurting and raping U.S. citizens.

---

Yes, but maybe more high level, just get the illegals the f*** out of this country.

doubledog said:

---

And Republicans want illegal immigrants to stop killing, hurting and raping U.S. citizens.

---

How about nobody goes around killing, raping, and hurting anyone?

That was illegal yesterday, still illegal today, and will be illegal tomorrow.

Ag98and03 said:

---

doubledog said:

---

And Republicans want illegal immigrants to stop killing, hurting and raping U.S. citizens.

---

How about nobody goes around killing, raping, and hurting anyone?

That was illegal yesterday, still illegal today, and will be illegal tomorrow.

---

There are consequences when you allow a population of 3rd World males with 3rd World attitudes towards women and crime in general into your country without vetting.

Some of us want to keep illegal immigration illegal.

The Democrats want open borders and immigration for all without question today, tomorrow and for the future.

Ag98and03 said:

---

doubledog said:

---

And Republicans want illegal immigrants to stop killing, hurting and raping U.S. citizens.

---

How about nobody goes around killing, raping, and hurting anyone?

That was illegal yesterday, still illegal today, and will be illegal tomorrow.

---

Is it? Then why are Marxists in Minneapolis and LA preventing those criminals from facing consequences? Seems like it is legal for some select people to do it.

JB99 said:

---

Some of the sensitive sites make sense like hospitals and schools

That's about it

---

The only sensitive sites should be nuclear reactors, military bases and the like. Of course it's unlikely those sites would require much enforcement because they have fences and guards who verifying who they permit in. Once schools and hospitals start verifying the legal status of those they let in, only then abound they be placed on a sensitive site list.

This is nothing but toilet paper

Cartels are spending some money on Dem campaigns……