Tucker Carlson has lost his way, something is seriously wrong.

77,487 Views | 701 Replies | Last: 9 days ago by Im Gipper
Aggie_Boomin 21
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

On the Russia thing, he's pointing out that we have all been deceived. Our cities are unsafe, unclean and hotbeds of corruption. Filth and degeneracy are not the cost of limited government, they are the byproduct of corruption. We have money for everyone around the world, yet nobody gives two ****s about the poor in Appalachia or our collapsing infrastructure or that our nation becomes more unrecognizable every day.

Ah yes, we should strive to have corruption levels as low as Russia's, excellent point.
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deceiving what I can see with my own eyes and experience with my own body? Your bloodlust, allegiance to celebrity and zeal for the protection of other nations at the expense of your own people deceive you.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Deceiving what I can see with my own eyes and experience with my own body?

Nailed it!

I'm Gipper
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

Queso1 said:

On the Russia thing, he's pointing out that we have all been deceived. Our cities are unsafe, unclean and hotbeds of corruption. Filth and degeneracy are not the cost of limited government, they are the byproduct of corruption. We have money for everyone around the world, yet nobody gives two ****s about the poor in Appalachia or our collapsing infrastructure or that our nation becomes more unrecognizable every day.

Ah yes, we should strive to have corruption levels as low as Russia's, excellent point.

Haha brother, we are already way beyond that
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AGHouston11 said:

Ulysses90 said:

Trump is a carbide chisel that is breaking chunks off the facade of the administrative state. Just a tool, nothing more.


I remember when he was the guy who was going to drain the swamp! It seems to be as full as ever. You rarely even hear that anymore. The swamp creatures are thriving.


I am not happy that he didn't fire 10x the number of people that he did. That doesn't change the fact that he has done more than any President in history to remove federal bureaucrats from power. Trump is far from perfection and he has some very bad advisors. He deserves credit for what he has accomplished relative to every other Republican or Democrat in the past 100 years. Calvin Coolidge is legitimately his only serious competitor for shrinking government and for regulating immigration.

The federal government workforce is smaller than at any time since 1966. That's even more impressive when you consider that there are only 1.4 million active duty personnel in the military today and there were 3.05 million in 1966.

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Queso1 said:

Deceiving what I can see with my own eyes and experience with my own body? Your bloodlust, allegiance to celebrity and zeal for the protection of other nations at the expense of your own people deceive you.


Death cults unite! Go Tucker!
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

Queso1 said:

On the Russia thing, he's pointing out that we have all been deceived. Our cities are unsafe, unclean and hotbeds of corruption. Filth and degeneracy are not the cost of limited government, they are the byproduct of corruption. We have money for everyone around the world, yet nobody gives two ****s about the poor in Appalachia or our collapsing infrastructure or that our nation becomes more unrecognizable every day.

Ah yes, we should strive to have corruption levels as low as Russia's, excellent point.


Good grief. The answer isn't what we have now or full authoritarian crack down on the streets (btw, if you think Moscow is full of secret police prowling around I've got a bridge to sell you).

Nobody here wants to address the uncomfortable question. How do we get order back to our cities? And why are they in such disorder? The answer isn't as simple as "because we aren't Russians!"
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
BlackGold
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

Queso1 said:

On the Russia thing, he's pointing out that we have all been deceived. Our cities are unsafe, unclean and hotbeds of corruption. Filth and degeneracy are not the cost of limited government, they are the byproduct of corruption. We have money for everyone around the world, yet nobody gives two ****s about the poor in Appalachia or our collapsing infrastructure or that our nation becomes more unrecognizable every day.

Ah yes, we should strive to have corruption levels as low as Russia's, excellent point.


Good grief. The answer isn't what we have now or full authoritarian crack down on the streets (btw, if you think Moscow is full of secret police prowling around I've got a bridge to sell you).

Nobody here wants to address the uncomfortable question. How do we get order back to our cities? And why are they in such disorder? The answer isn't as simple as "because we aren't Russians!"


People can't decide if Russia, Iran, China, Muslims, or the Pope is the greatest threat to America, so they all are. It's definitely not the deflating value of the American dollar though.
ATX_AG_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Aggie_Boomin 21 said:

Queso1 said:

On the Russia thing, he's pointing out that we have all been deceived. Our cities are unsafe, unclean and hotbeds of corruption. Filth and degeneracy are not the cost of limited government, they are the byproduct of corruption. We have money for everyone around the world, yet nobody gives two ****s about the poor in Appalachia or our collapsing infrastructure or that our nation becomes more unrecognizable every day.

Ah yes, we should strive to have corruption levels as low as Russia's, excellent point.


Good grief. The answer isn't what we have now or full authoritarian crack down on the streets (btw, if you think Moscow is full of secret police prowling around I've got a bridge to sell you).

Nobody here wants to address the uncomfortable question. How do we get order back to our cities? And why are they in such disorder? The answer isn't as simple as "because we aren't Russians!"


The reason we have disorder in our cities is pretty simple. It's because of liberals. Crazy progressive liberal govts in major cities and liberal judges constantly releasing dangerous, and often mentally ill, criminals back onto our streets. If you arrest and punish, crime will go down and order will return. Liberals believe we have an over incarceration problem when we really have an under incarceration problem. Liberals believe it's more important to have compassion for criminals than victims. We don't prosecute petty crime like theft, drug use, gun possession etc., and under prosecute major/violent crime like murder, armed robbery, assault, etc.

The only solution is to change people's opinions and voting habits. But I'm not sure how we do that because politics has become tribal. MSM hides and misinforms with propaganda. The constant excuse that prosecuting minorities is racist, etc.

But it's not a mystery why our major cities are in disorder. Look at the govt coupled with the demographic.
trip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No one is listening to him to agree or gain knowledge. They are listening to post his next radical statement. He is a shock jock now.
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Every day, it gets harder and harder to distinguish the ruhtahd right from leftists




bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Both need a padded cell at St. E's.

Throw away the key.
Agsrback12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The more I watch Tucker the more I realize the globalists are coming out the woodworks now that there is push back against it and a realistic chance it's disrupted. He's giving globalist a voice and outing himself as one imo.
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Goober Brother wants in on the act!




And the lying scum lies more and more.





I'm Gipper
TRM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?

I'm Gipper
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Im Gipper said:




Maybe he should contact the maga support group from the other thread
4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He has lost his mind
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I mean, it really is weird. He's making Glenn Beck and O'Reilly seem even keeled and well-dispositioned.

Too many frozen dinners? Mad Fox put him out with the burning dumpster of $750 million?

I liked Tucker's initial podcasting / long form interviews. Then they just got stranger and stranger.

Is there a poly market for his brain tumor diagnosis?
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker has always been strange but I appreciate him asking the hard questions. The gatekeepers didn't even ask Huckabee why he met with a American Traitor. We join Israel to attack Iran in June then in July Huckabee meets with the Traitor Pollard and nobody ask him about it until February.

So Tucker is the only one to ask why the head American in Israel meets with a American who got caught spying for Israel. Who he also help get released. Huckabee who is fixture on fox it wasnt like he was hiding for 7 months. This is why I support Tucker.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You pay for the subscription still?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hard questions? Laughable. He ask some questions regarding the various conspiracy theories he parrots. Hard? No, but pretty unanswerable.

Remember when he talked with putin? Where were his hard questions then?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That sure wasn't a banana in Ol' Tuck's pocket when he was interviewing Putin.
Haleyscomet50
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

Hard questions? Laughable. He ask some questions regarding the various conspiracy theories he parrots. Hard? No, but pretty unanswerable.

Remember when he talked with putin? Where were his hard questions then?

How is Tucker the crazy one when he was the only one to ask Huckabee about meeting with a Traitor? I guess nowadays they just throw the word around so Traitor doesn't mean anything but this was a real one. Stole our secrets including names of our informants in the area and gave them to mossad.

Huckabee who was on TV all the time for 7 months was never asked this. So that means Tucker is the only one asking the real questions. I'm sure no one on this thread wants our Ambassador meeting with a Traitor.

Why should he ask Hard questions of Putin? Putin isn't paid by the American taxpayers Putin isn't accountable to Tuckers listeners. Huckabee works for the taxpayer he should be held accountable. Tucker was the only one to hold Huckabee accountable.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How anyone is still defending Tucker is beyond me. He's unhinged, anti-American, and his angry takes make Alex Jones seem docile. He's caustic.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lolz. Of course its the joos. So predictable.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who?mikejones! said:

Hard questions? Laughable. He ask some questions regarding the various conspiracy theories he parrots. Hard? No, but pretty unanswerable.

Remember when he talked with putin? Where were his hard questions then?

Do be fair, if I am sitting in Moscow in a room with Vlad Putin i am probably not going to be inclined to "give him the business".

Putin was very impressive in those interviews but that was credit to Putin and not discredit to Tucker. And letting Putin blabber on is probably to most helpful for everyone as it allows for more analysis.

Come to think of it, Tucker letting someone else talk is what I liked about his long format on X. So maybe I never liked Tucker at all..?
Bulldog73
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


I thought this was a joke. This loon/click ho having a 7% (or anything greater than .0000000001%) chance of being the GOP nominee in 2028?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He doesn't have a 7% chance.

He doesn't have a 0.7% chance.

He doesn't have a 0.0000000000007% chance.

This isn't a poll.

This is one or more fools dropping some $$$ onto one of these stupid prediction gambling sites.
astros4545
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fading Joe Public is a great way to get rich
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

That sure wasn't a banana in Ol' Tuck's pocket when he was interviewing Putin.

What was it?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie Dad Sip said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

That sure wasn't a banana in Ol' Tuck's pocket when he was interviewing Putin.

What was it?

Sip protesting device.
Aggie Dad Sip
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Aggie Dad Sip said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

That sure wasn't a banana in Ol' Tuck's pocket when he was interviewing Putin.

What was it?

Sip protesting device.

What's that?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
NSFW.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.