So...I just unified Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

19,606 Views | 205 Replies | Last: 6 days ago by aggiez03
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know, time, the universe, and everything. I'm really not sure what to think of it and honestly been in a personal fog. I've been working on this for a while and decided to publish it today. It's in official review in the quantum community, but you can still get to it if you want to.

S Theory



At a very high level, it started with a simple question to ChatGPT when it was hallucinating over something trivial. I asked it if it can just invent new math and if it could, what a unified theory would look like. The final state shown in the paper is dramatically different than how it started. Fought through a lot of stupid mistakes it was making. That said, the answer was good enough to keep me engaged

Basically, entanglement of information is the driver for the beginning of the universe. Particularly, the entanglement of primordial particles I'm calling "Spatoms". When the spatoms entangle to the point where they are stable, they generate Stable Entanglement Motifs. At this point, both time and space form. From my understanding of General Relativity, time was always given as a constant. My math shows that it emerges and prior to the big bang simply didn't exist. I have a tough time conceptually wrapping my brain around it to be honest.

I thought I was just messing around with this framework at first, but the more I worked it, the more real the math was looking. Here are some of my highlights over the past month:

1) I can derive the speed of light from this framework. I show why it is what it is instead of taking it as a given.
2) I can estimate what the size of the center of a black hole is. It isn't a singularity in this math. It actually has a dimension of at least 1 qubit.
3) Einsteins General Relativity equation for gravity falls out of the lagrangian
4) I believe I'm replicating the spin of Fermions and Bosons
5) I show what happens to time both during the big bang and at the center of a black hole. Basically, time starts at the BB and comes to a complete stop in a black hole. Still exists in a black hole, but doesn't proceed.

Eventually, I'll get my python code uploaded to github or something, but for now I need to do something useful and mow the yard.





YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
No idea what you are talking about but if you just Tony Starked time travel then I just want my name on the thread.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think I was on the Howard Hughes trajectory actually


lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If this is how you use AI, you're doing it wrong.
Grok said:

A physicist named Philip J. Fry,
Claimed quantum and gravity comply.
With "Spatoms" that tangle,
Time and space wrangle,
His math makes the universe sigh!
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DP
ValleyRatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I love to ponder such things.
Flatlander
How long do you want to ignore this user?
yadda yadda yadda, the answer is 42. whatever.

What was the question again?
Nagler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flatlander said:

yadda yadda yadda, the answer is 42. whatever.

What was the question again?

Considering that this is the guy who made the Texas 42 app, 42 might really be the answer.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Have you played it lately? lol. This, among other things, is what has been distracting me from working on it.
Nagler
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I haven't recently, I tend to go on runs where I play a bunch and then don't play. I'm in a don't play mode at the moment.
cr0wbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

I have a tough time conceptually wrapping my brain around it to be honest.

Same here.

I quickly discovered there are varying degrees of nerd in this Texags space. You might be on the upper echelon. I only do the books for a construction contractor in SW Houston. I wish I could conceptually understand these principles
ElGatoBill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like you're ready to build the tachyon amplifier. Time Warps! Let us know when your next interview with Matt Lauer is coming up.

Kidding aside, very interesting OP.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If anyone knows any physics profs here, can I seriously ask you to send him/her my way?
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What does your theory have to say about parallel universes?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That they don't exist. We have 4 and only 4 dimensions
McNasty
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

That they don't exist. We have 4 and only 4 dimensions


x, y, z, and time?
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I congratulate Chat GPT on its future Nobel prize.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So you didn't mention much about how gravity works, beyond claiming to have worked out the math for the extreme conditions (ie at a singularity), but I would normally expect some kind of explanation of "quantum gravity" to go part and parcel with someone's claim that they "just unified Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity"
spieg12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aw man. Have to have an account to view the link.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well, I showed that entanglement acts as gravity. Both on the small scale and the large scale. Not sure what else you are looking for. If you're looking for a write up on the graviton, you won't see it in this draft. Our model is showing it doesn't exist, but need a little more work to prove it before I put it in a paper.

Also show that this information entanglement gradient between spatoms will cause space curvature to develop and that it can predict 1/2 fermion spin. Even was able get spin -1 to work last night.

And yes, XYZ and time.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When I say you "didnt mention much" I mean here, because Im not creating an account to read your paper and likely dont have the knowledge necessary to offer critique anyway. I meant you didnt explain that here.

So basically you're saying it indicates a curved spacetime exists as described in general relativity but created by the entanglement of these "spatoms"? Theres no graviton particle or whatever.
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"So basically you're saying it indicates a curved spacetime exists as described in general relativity but created by the entanglement of these "spatoms"? Theres no graviton particle or whatever."

Correct. Some magical quantum particle for gravity is not required. Just entanglement of information.
wessimo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Can you post your paper somewhere that doesn't require registration to view?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
yeah, I'll post it on github tonight. That should work?
Lathspell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JJxvi said:

I congratulate Chat GPT on its future Nobel prize.


I will say, a significant amount of personal stress I was experiencing through this was based on "how can I possibly be the first person to ask this? There must be something wrong with the math"
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My frustration with the LLMs (my playtime is using grok to try and code web applications) is how fast it forgets what weve already done and starts making erroneous assumptions about things it should know/remember
Head Ninja In Charge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

yeah, I'll post it on github tonight. That should work?
GitHub requires a user account though, no?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hmmm....what's the best way then? public drop box?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Grok is absolutely horrible. Could not agree more about some of their limitations.

For what it's worth, I would have ChatGPT help me with an equation...then I would bounce it off Claude as an individual reviewer when it seemed like we were getting stuck on something.
HossAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gonna go ahead and page juan this just in case this isn't complete nonsense
KidDoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

Grok is absolutely horrible. Could not agree more about some of their limitations.

For what it's worth, I would have ChatGPT help me with an equation...then I would bounce it off Claude as an individual reviewer when it seemed like we were getting stuck on something.
I find Grok pretty darn good for medical queries.

The stuff you are talking about is WAY over my head though, impressive stuff!
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
HossAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Philip J Fry said:

"So basically you're saying it indicates a curved spacetime exists as described in general relativity but created by the entanglement of these "spatoms"? Theres no graviton particle or whatever."

Correct. Some magical quantum particle for gravity is not required. Just entanglement of information.

So does this mean gravity would just slowly go away throughout the universe in this model as more and more particles become unentangled?
Philip J Fry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Very good question. Part of the problem I'm having on the simulation side is that the speed of entanglement (speed of light) is so fast that I think I need a much much larger model to predict what will happen. I've had to artificially slow down the growth rate just to show something meaningful with the few nodes I'm using. What our math is suggesting is that our universe is still entangling so it's driving us towards continued expansion.

Basically, my framework allegedly solves our dark energy issue too.

And let me say for the record, all of this is still blowing my mind.
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I listen to StarTalk (Neil deGrasse Tyson's podcast) in the evenings, and I swear there is one that I heard recently where they discussed some ideas were going around that seem similar to how you are describing this, it was about the fabric of space-time being "woven" out of wormholes, which seems like a very similar concept. I think he was talking to Brian Greene, I'm gonna see if I can find it.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.