agsalaska said:
austinag1997 said:
agsalaska said:
Rexter said:
Being in Canada, she probably couldn't have a firearm.
While that's probably true, bear spray is better anyway. I wouldn't have a problem going down any trail in Alaska without a gun but I would never do it without spray.
Can you imagine the potential red tape/PIA it could be killing a bear? I guess the spray works. Black bears and Grizzlys are 2 total different deals. I think your interaction with grizzlys are much less successful statistically.
I would say this woman was extrmely fortunate.
Especially in Canada. That would be a nightmare. The problem with guns, especially handguns, and bears is they are too fast and way too thick. Headshots with a .44 mag on a bear running at you is extremely difficult. There is a far better chance that the noise scares them off long before you actually hit them. Bear spray is a lot more effective.
I was told that pretty quickly by the locals when I moved there. Carry bear spray. Always.
I agree with always carrying bear spray. And you're right about the difficulty of making a head shot on a fast moving bear, but it doesn't necessarily be a head have to be effective. Two years ago my chiropractor and his son were elk hunting in NW Wyoming and a grizzly charged them out of the brush at about 12 yards. The son was able to kill the grizzly with a handgun (10mm). I asked him (Dr. K) if he thought bear spray would have worked and he said he would have hated to rely on it, they were stalking an elk so moving into the wind.
And while I admire the lady's courage in trying to protect her dog, If it were me I definitely would have dropped the leash. When I'm hiking in grizzly country, which is pretty much every week, my dog is never leashed. He walks ahead of me and I figure he's way more capable of avoiding a bear's teeth than I am.