Midsized truck as tow vehicle?

863 Views | 14 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by '03ag
Kaiser von Wilhelm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So in the next few months im planning to order a 19 foot Escape travel trailer, and need a tow vehicle. I was really hoping to get an SUV for this, as I prefer the day to day utility of an SUV over a pickup, but the only ones capable seem to be full size, which I don't want. It wouldn't even fit in my garage (funny how buying an old house isn't made for modern sized vehicles). Same with a full sized truck. Ive only ever driven cars or a crossover, so this is a bit new to me. So...it seems that my best option for this need will be a midsized truck. Which brings me to you guys...

Id be hauling a relatively small trailer that is 19 feet long with a GVWR of 4400 pounds. So a lot of the options I initially wanted, like the new Pilot, don't work. Or at least well. Most cap at 5000 pounds towing, so it would technically be possible, but a bad idea. Also, I live in Idaho, so it's not exactly the same as towing on level ground for hundreds of miles. Most of my travel involves mountain driving at altitude. As such, I am aiming for towing of 7k and above, but might be able to get by with 6k towing. I might not feel as good about things, but im confident that it would be doable if it would be a viable option that doesnt require the vehicle to struggle and want to die in the process. Hence why Honda options are off the list, unfortunately.
Payload is another concern. It's pretty remarkable that payload capacity is so low on many of these SUVs and smaller trucks. Hell, the new passport payload is below 1k pounds, even thought its towing capabilities are respectable. Wtf is that??? After accounting for tongue weight you'd be lucky to fit 4 people (at least two would have to be kids) and a couple bags. I guess my dog would have to stay behind.

So far, after lots of research, I've focused on a few that fit the specs I need.

-It seems like the Ranger and Colorado might be the best matches. On paper at least. Solid towing capabilities with pretty good (for the size compared to other options) payload. And the interiors are pretty decent for the price, with pretty good towing features already built in (Colorado), or for modest add-on costs (ranger).

-The tacoma and even the new 4runner might be ok, but after you add on a few things that are standard in the others (like the towing package with the Colorado which isn't additional), you're suddenly 10-20k more than the rest. Hell, to get the towing tech package you have to pick one of the highest two trims just to have the privilege to include that option. At that point, im already way past the other vehicles in cost before adding on anything else. Im close to done with Toyota's games, along with the fact that their quality control has dropped tremendously the last few years, so they're pushed further down on the list. It's sad, because I was ready to get the new 4runner or tacoma before I really started digging into what they provide and comparing to the other options in the category. Since they can't even claim to outclass the rest in quality anymore, they lost their main selling point in the current generation. Very disappointing to say the least.

-Nissan Frontier could be ok based on the specs, but from what ive read it isn't as capable as the other options. Not sure if that's actually true, hence why im including it on this list.

-GMC Canyon. I know nothing about this one, aside from that the specs fall right into the needs. So it's on the list.

So...what are your thoughts on these options in terms of capabilities, reliability, and overall value? What other options should I look into? What should I steer clear of? Ive read a ton on most of these, and it seems like the ranger and Colorado might be the best in this case, but im here to learn and I value the feedback from real experience, not just what online reviews say.
mm98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems you've put a lot of thought into this and have already narrowed it down

I would think the Colorado TurboMax or Ranger 2.7 would be good choices. High torque for mountains, and some recent TFL videos show they handle the weight well going downhill. Downside is the Ranger is expensive as hell for a midsized.

If you can find a long bed Frontier, that might be the most stable ride of them all. Worth a look anyway. But the engine output seems inferior to the other two.

bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not a jeep guy but the gladiator might fit the bill. I remember being impressed with its tow numbers when it came out.
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GMC Canyon = Chevy Colorado

Colorado s cheaper from what I can tell. Canyon i believe has some nicer trims.
Naveronski
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are you only buying new?

It seems like an older Tundra would fit the bill or a Lexus GX 460-470.
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I recommend the Colorado. Its engine is fantastic and should have plenty of power. We did sell ours when we had a baby because it became tough with the car seat and baby things.
Kaiser von Wilhelm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for all the good responses.

For the ranger, the 2.7 looks solid overall, but I've heard that the 2.3 is a great engine too. Same towing and (or at least close to) payload. Is it worth the added cost for the 2.7? Otherwise, the price of the ranger drops the ranger to a more reasonable level and only a little over a comparable Colorado.

I gave the Jeep options a fair shot, along with the grand Cherokee which seems quite capable and nice overall, but I'm pretty concerned about their reliability and build quality. Are those concerns not as significant as people make them out to be at this point...?

For the GMC Canyon, I looked into them briefly just now and they do look a bit nicer, but are the capabilities pretty much the same then? Just nicer interior to justify a little higher cost? Haven't looked at them in person, as I discounted the option initially, but it seems they're worth a look. I just want to make sure that the capabilities don't take a hit in the tradeoff for being "nicer."

Not necessarily needing new, but since I am new to towing I was hoping to get the added technology features that are available in the newer vehicle options to make up for my inexperience. Any help with getting the hang of the process is very welcome, at least initially until I am no longer am a novice, if that makes sense. But otherwise, I will definitely consider those used options and look into them more. So far it seems the prices on those Toyota options are really high for used vehicles, but absolutely absurd for the new versions. The new GX...well over 100k...ugh. Used (at least within the last 5 years) dropping into the 60s, maybe 50s, is still pretty steep. That said, I won't eliminate that option since those are capable and meet my criteria.

The Colorado definitely is the top of the list at this point. So...any issues with reliability or build quality there? Or in any of these? Since Toyota has dropped down in that front, it seems that this question applies to everything nowadays.

Any opinion of the Nissan Pathfinder?

Got lots of homework to do it seems. Thanks again for the info. Been over a decade since I've even looked into buying a new vehicle since I keep them for a long time, and never for a truck, so lots to learn...
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does the Pathfinder have a CVT?
Kaiser von Wilhelm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bam02 said:

Does the Pathfinder have a CVT?


I don't think so this gen.
mm98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
9sp now.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember your payload numbers don't include spray in bed liners, bed covers, passengers, etc.

I assume 370 pounds for my wife, dog, and me. Bedliners are about 10 lbs per foot of bed so a 5.5' bed would be ~55 lbs. Bed cover is another 40-60 lbs. if you use a weight distribution hitch, that's another 100 lbs.

Suddenly a 1400 lb payload on a Z71 is down to just over 800 lbs. Subtract a 530 lb (12% of 4400) tongue weight and now you have about 300 lbs remaining. Still safe but if your dog is heavier than mine, stow gear in your bed while towing, or you upgrade to a larger trailer, your milage may vary.
Kaiser von Wilhelm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
lb3 said:

Remember your payload numbers don't include spray in bed liners, bed covers, passengers, etc.

I assume 370 pounds for my wife, dog, and me. Bedliners are about 10 lbs per foot of bed so a 5.5' bed would be ~55 lbs. Bed cover is another 40-60 lbs. if you use a weight distribution hitch, that's another 100 lbs.

Suddenly a 1400 lb payload on a Z71 is down to just over 800 lbs. Subtract a 530 lb (12% of 4400) tongue weight and now you have about 300 lbs remaining. Still safe but if your dog is heavier than mine or you upgrade to a larger trailer, your milage may vary.


Exactly. Which is why it's so aggravating to see the specced out trucks with huge towing numbers and payloads of 1000 or 1100. Completely unusable.

And yes, those numbers are similar to what ill have too. Guess additional passengers are riding in the trailer...

This is one of my challenges when you are forced to upgrade to higher trims just to get features you actually want, adding hundreds of pounds of weight to make payload borderline acceptable. Nevermind that this also adds thousands to the price. Reason number one I'm hating Toyota at this point.

Also, thats a good point about the WDH. A WDH is necessary for a lot of vehicles I've been looking at previously, mostly SUVs, but are those as necessary for the midsized trucks on this list? From what I understand, the answer is yes, but I don't have the experience to really know.
lb3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've been looking at the F150 Power Boost with the 7.2KW Pro Power Onboard option. The ability to power the house during a power outage and provide power to a trailer when boondocking is worth going with a smaller trailer.

Ford claims ~11k pound towing weight (GCVW-curb weight). But the minuscule payload makes it impossible to tow more than about 5500 lbs if we load much of anything in the bed.
TSW2012
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The engine in the Colorado is great and has show good reliability in the 1500s as well.

That being said if the payload concerns above are worrying to you it's is pretty much the same price to get a 1500 with that engine as the Colorado.
'03ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Naveronski said:

Are you only buying new?

It seems like an older Tundra would fit the bill or a Lexus GX 460-470.
This. Take whatever you were going to spend on a new Colorado and buy they best GX460 that you can get. Used prices are high for a reason.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.