NoahAg said:
Wolfpac 08 said:
Keep in mind in Sumlin had an NFL O-Line, a Heisman QB, and Mike Evans in his first 2 years
Not quite apples to apples
That's kind of a dumb criticism. Every successful coach has one thing in common: talented players.
Criticize Sumlin where it's due, but saying "oh he only won because he had great players" is dumb.
No,
this is a dumb take. That 2012 team didn't just have "talented players." That was one of the most talented teams we have ever had, and he didn't do anything to build it or develop it. He stepped into the greatest college QB of all time, an O-line that would all be high NFL draft picks within 1-2 years, 2 of the greatest wide receivers ever to step foot on campus (Swope had the school record for yards in a single season until Evans, now an NFL HoF lock, broke it), and a junior/senior laden defense that could go toe to toe with any offense.
Beyond that, our 2012 schedule was incredibly easy in hindsight. Everyone built it up as this daunting gauntlet, but it wasn't. Arkansas has been good for years, but they fired Petrino in the off-season and had John L. Smith as a HC. Auburn had just won a national championship, but they ended up going 0fer in the SEC and during Chizik. Missouri finished 5-7. Ole Miss finished 7-6. MSU was a respectable 8-5. He had 4 actually tough opponents (LSU, Florida, Bama, and OU) and went 2-2.
Arguably,
any coach could've gone 11-2 and a good coach would've done better.