Enviroag02 said:
I guess I don't understand this. The rule states it can't be thicker than 2.61" at the thickest part. If these are in compliance then that means for all these years all of MLB has been using bats that were not as thick as they could be…and that's makes no sense. Why would they not maximize bat size?
The regs for ever have been that a bat diameter cannot be more than about 2 5/8ths inches at it's maximum diameter but I think most MLB bats are closer to 2 1/2" in diameter. Looks like this maximizes the barrel diameter while maintaining weight by tapering back down to the end of the bat.