We wouldn't have both of them as L, both will be critical for us. One will be L, one DS. I could see Thedford wearing the L as a backup

Ag4eva95 said:

---

We wouldn't have both of them as L, both will be critical for us. One will be L, one DS. I could see Thedford wearing the L as a backup

---

Was responding to the assumption of a 6-2 with both OH playing 6 rotations. Not much room for a DS if you already have a L, S, and OH in the back row.

I guess you can sit the 2nd best little on the bench for most of the game and only come in situationally. But if they are both L, you could play the offensive and defensive L game if one is stronger at serve receive or whatever.

Obviously a 5-1 or Ring not playing 6 rotations gives you room for a DS and having your best two littles on the court at the same time is a plus.

I enjoyed watching the run, but didn't get to see the whole season so I don't know the answer to my question below.

I hope it's the case she can, does Megan's passing when she was on the floor last year indicate she can be a 6 rotation player?

That's valid! It's a good problem to have. I'm curious to see if Ring can hang with 6 rotations. I can see it being similar to Hellmuth. But Applegate and Rodriguez, in my opinion, can be one of the best "little" rooms in the nation. Morrison will get creative with how they get involved. The exciting thing is, we have many options. Across the board. This is another deeep team, just a little unproven at some interesting positions