Texas A&M Basketball

No rationalization exists for No. 12 Texas A&M's 86-84 loss to Vanderbilt

No. 12 A&M's losing streak is now three as the Aggies dropped their penultimate home game of the season to Vanderbilt on Wednesday, 86-84. In the process of bolstering the 'Dores' resume, the Ags are now at risk of sliding to a No. 3 or No. 4 seed in the NCAA Tournament.
February 26, 2025
20,293 Views
9 Comments
Story Poster
Photo by Will Huffman, TexAgs
PLAYING
Buzz Williams
PLAYING
Wilcher & Payne
PLAYING
Mark Byington

There is no spin, no silver lining and no bright side for No. 12 Texas A&M’s 86-84 basketball loss to Vanderbilt on Wednesday night.

Falling at Mississippi State could be forgiven. Road wins in the hazardous Southeastern Conference are hard to come by. A loss to Tennessee is understandable. The Volunteers are among the best teams in the nation.

But no rationalization exists for No. 12 Texas A&M (20-8, 9-6) suffering a third consecutive loss. Vanderbilt (19-9, 7-8) is an inferior opponent who had been struggling with a 1-6 SEC record on the road.

Vanderbilt’s Tyler Nickel converted seven times from 3-point range to spur the Commodores, who converted 18 of 24 free throws in the final three-and-a-half minutes to hold off a frantic A&M rally.

The comeback bid came up short when Pharrel Payne could not get to a lobbed in-bounds pass from Wade Taylor IV with just a fraction of a second remaining.

Ten days ago, the Aggies were being trumpeted as perhaps a No. 2 seed in the upcoming NCAA Tournament. Now, they’re in danger of falling to a No. 4 seed or lower.

“And the things from an intangible standpoint: Our communication. Our physicality. Our connective-ness. All of those things we have to execute at a higher rate, whether we play Vanderbilt at home, whether we play at Florida.”
- A&M head coach Buzz Williams

That raises the question of whether the Aggies are merely in a slump or are they in a more perilous situation.

“(There’s) just not the consistency that we have to have in order to be as good as we can be,” A&M head coach Buzz Williams said. "You can pick any category. Offensively, defensively, on the glass, special teams, late game, how we start, how we come out of ATOs (automatic timeouts), dead balls.

“And the things from an intangible standpoint: Our communication. Our physicality. Our connective-ness. All of those things we have to execute at a higher rate, whether we play Vanderbilt at home, whether we play at Florida.”

Williams mentioned Florida because the Aggies travel to face the No. 3-ranked Gators on Saturday in hopes of ending their skid.

That will require a much better overall effort. The Aggies shot just 37.1 percent and committed a dozen turnovers. Meanwhile, Vanderbilt shot 50 percent in the second half and hit 10 of 24 times from 3-point range overall.

That was the second straight game in which the Aggies were victimized at the arc. Tennessee hit 13 of 27 times from 3-point range in a 77-69 win over the Aggies last Saturday.

Payne had 23 points, and Taylor had 21, but they did not get enough help until the final minutes when A&M was hoping for a miraculous rally.

Early on, Vanderbilt, which badly needed the Quadrant 1 win to enhance its NCAA Tournament resume, threatened to take control.

Led by Nickel, who hit four treys in the first half, the Commodores went on a 15-2 run to take a 28-16 lead.

But after a Williams timeout, the Aggies — boosted by a couple of CJ Wilcher 3-pointers — trimmed the deficit to 34-32 at halftime.

Will Huffman, TexAgs
Pharrel Payne scored a game-high 23 points and hauled in six rebounds.

A&M eventually held a 44-42 lead when Payne converted a 3-point play with 17:22 showing.

Vandy responded but held just a 56-54 lead after Taylor hit four consecutive free throws with 9:24 to play.

The Commodores’ leading scorer Jason Edwards fouled Taylor and then was assessed his fourth foul on a technical for disputing the call.

He and forwards Devin McGlockton and Jaylen Carey spent the next five minutes on the bench in foul trouble.

Alas, A&M could not capitalize. Instead, Vanderbilt increased its lead to 68-60 after Nickel hit a 3-pointer with 4:11 to play.

“It was four bench players and Tyler Nickel,” Vanderbilt head coach Mark Byington said of the Commodores’ lineup in that stretch. “The four guys we had in are actually really good on defense. We were getting stops. We were getting rebounds. We were making things tough for them.”

Vanderbilt then converted 18 of 24 free throws over the final 3:33 to hold off the Aggies.

Wilcher and Zhuric Phelps hit back-to-back 3-pointers in the final 13 seconds to pull A&M within 86-84.

The Commodores then lost the basketball out of bounds on the sideline. But only 0.2 seconds remained, which meant A&M could only hope to tip-in and long in-bounds pass.

Payne never had a chance to get to the lob.

9 Comments
Discussion from...

No rationalization exists for No. 12 Texas A&M's 86-84 loss to Vanderbilt

14,748 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 5 mo ago by TAMUallen
Detmersdislocatedshoulder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
we are not a team that can win consistently if we are not the team that wants it more.
Sgt. Schultz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doesn't matter. This team is not going to do anything in the tournament as it is very flawed. Maybe they get a good draw and get to Sweet 16 but the flaws could show up in Round 1 and they lose the 1st game.
I know nothing!
SA68AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
William's refusal to recruit 3 point shooters has always put a low ceiling on his teams.

What you see is what we got.
TheRatt87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. As a team, 30% from 3, less than 50% on 2pt FG, and less than 70% FT.

Effort is there, as evidenced by rebounding. And defense for the most part is ok, other than occasional refusal to make anyone other than the hot hand beat you (Nickel for Vandy, Lanier fot TN). Just flat out can't shoot.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That game was winnable. On the players and coaches to figure out how to address what happened.

I'm not sure rationalizations matter. But that loss was the more motivated team beating the team with the better resume. That happens in college basketball but usually better teams win those kinds of games especially at home.

This takes me back to my original feelings on Buzz when he first came up in this board. Why take a flyer on him when he doesn't recruit top talent? What a the goal of our program? To never have great offense only good (not great) defense that can't stop streaky players?

It's a repeating theme.
northeastag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The rationalization is simple. The team is good, but not great. They have as high a chance of losing when playing other good teams as they do of winning. They may go on a hot streak when the ball bounces their way, just like they can go on a cold streak when it doesn't. The team is currently on a cold streak.

Let's hope they go on a hot streak at tourney time.
JuneBug07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The problem with Buzz's style is that it is not meant to beat teams comfortably. It is designed to wear other teams down either physically or through foul trouble and then squeak a win by at the end. This is evident even when we play weaker teams than us. Most of the time we barely win, or barely lose.
We basically try to out hustle teams to win. Which on the surface sounds great, but not only does it tire our opponent, it tires us. We need more players that shoot at a higher percentage rather than having to rebound several times before one falls in.
We can go on streaks during the regular season when you have more days between games to rest. During tourneys with less time between games we are gassed and shooting likely becomes even more difficult than it already is for us. I don't think Buzz's game plan will ever make for a deep run. But as far as our program history is concerned, he is one of our better coaches, mainly due to our low bar.
fightinag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They are who we thought they were....Not Good at shooting
NEXT YEAR IS HERE.......again
TAMUallen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fightinag said:

They are who we thought they were....Not Good at shooting


The issue is Wade. If you play him tight and foul him, he doesn't respond well and we have nobody else who can step up.

The Kentucky game showed us all we needed to see. The effort wasn't there and we never had a shot. No we're dropping games that we can't
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.