Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III resigns

After being named Texas A&M University's Interim President on July 21, 2023, and elevated to the full-time position that November, Mark A. Welsh III will resign from the position, effective Friday, Sept. 19, according to an announcement from Chancellor Glenn Hegar.
September 18, 2025
98k Views
124 Comments
Story Poster
Photo by Katie Smith, TexAgs

On Thursday afternoon, Texas A&M University System Chancellor Glenn Hegar announced that Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III will resign, effectively Friday, Sept. 19, at 5 p.m. CT.

This announcement comes after Welsh’s handling of a controversy involving a Children’s Literature class in which a video showed a Texas A&M University student having a disagreement over gender studies curriculum with professor Melissa McCoul.

Texas Representative Brian Harrison said that the student was “kicked out” of the class after objecting to “transgender indoctrination.”

While there were immediate calls to terminate the professor in question, Welsh was recorded telling an upset student, “Well, that’s not happening.”

On Sept. 9, 2025, Welsh moved to terminate McCoul’s employment.

However, calls for investigations into Welsh’s handling of the situation, as well as Texas A&M’s curriculum surrounding LGBT and DEI studies, persisted even after the dean, Mark Zoran, and the head of the affected department, Emily Johansen, were removed from administrative duties.

Earlier this month, Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights at the Department of Justice, tweeted that the DOJ would also investigate.

“President Welsh is a man of honor who has led Texas A&M with selfless dedication,” said Chancellor Hegar via a release. “We are grateful for his service and contributions. At the same time, we agree that now is the right moment to make a change and to position Texas A&M for continued excellence in the years ahead.”

A former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force and Dean of Texas A&M’s Bush School of Government and Public Service, Welsh was made Interim President of Texas A&M University following M. Katherine Banks’ resignation on July 21, 2023. In November that year, Welsh was named the sole finalist to be the university’s full-time president.

Along with the news of Welsh’s resignation, the Texas A&M University System did not appoint an interim president. Instead, a release indicated that the Board will “initiate a national search for a permanent president and appoint an interim president to ensure a seamless transition.”

Whoever succeeds Welsh will become the ninth Texas A&M President — in a full-time or interim capacity — since Robert M. Gates left the position to serve as Secretary of Defense of the United States in December 2006.

The following is a press release from the Texas A&M University System:

COLLEGE STATION, Texas — Chancellor Glenn Hegar and the Texas A&M University System Board of Regents today announced that Mark Welsh will step down from his role as President of Texas A&M University, effective Friday, Sept. 19 at 5 p.m.

Chancellor Hegar thanked General Welsh for his service to the university and the nation, noting his distinguished career as an Air Force pilot and member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, as well as his leadership in advancing student success, research growth, and community engagement at Texas A&M.

“President Welsh is a man of honor who has led Texas A&M with selfless dedication,” said Chancellor Hegar. “We are grateful for his service and contributions. At the same time, we agree that now is the right moment to make a change and to position Texas A&M for continued excellence in the years ahead.”

Board of Regents Chairman Robert Albritton added: “General Welsh’s legacy of leadership and service is one that the Aggie family will always remember. The Board of Regents is united in ensuring that this transition strengthens the university’s future and keeps Texas A&M true to its mission and values.”

In the coming days, the Board of Regents, will initiate a national search for a permanent president and appoint an interim president to ensure a seamless transition.

About The Texas A&M University System
The Texas A&M University System is one of the largest and most impactful higher education systems in the country, with an annual budget of $8.1 billion. Its statewide network includes 12 universities, a comprehensive health science center, eight state agencies, Texas A&M–Fort Worth and the Texas A&M–RELLIS. The Texas A&M System serves approximately 175,000 students and reaches millions more through service, research and outreach programs each year. With nearly $1.6 billion in annual research expenditures, the A&M System fuels innovation, supports communities and drives Texas’ economy forward.
124 Comments
Discussion from...

Texas A&M University President Mark A. Welsh III resigns

50,757 Views | 124 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by LarryLayman
Maroon Flash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Denver Shooter - Trans
Aberdeen Shooter - Trans
Nashville Shooter - Trans
Georgia Shooter - Trans
Philadelphia Shooter - Trans
Uvalde Shooter - Trans
Iowa Shooter - Trans
Colorado Shooter - Trans
Minnesota Shooter - Trans
Charlie Kirk Shooter - Trans activist with trans "girlfriend"

This is an astounding list considering the very small portion of the population that suffers from gender dysphoria.

The fact that trans ideology was being normalized at Texas A&M is a very strong basis for firing President Welsh.

Maroon Flash
ChrisTAMU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
State employees should ignore state law? That's your stance?
Caesar4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't really get why any kind of trans discussion/teaching was happening in a children's lit class in the first place. Seems quite wrong/inappropriate. Not sure about the legality but seems wrong to me. It shouldn't have come down to a legality question, it should have been intercepted/prevented before even having to come to that.

I also didn't get why the student referred to the "President's laws". That's kind of scary, as if she views the President as the law maker/dictator. That makes her sound like a lemming.
WHO DAT?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What a clown! See ya loser !
John Cocktolstoy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
St Hedwig Aggie said:

Great to get that Obama DEI lap dog out…tremendous damage caused. Academia is rotted and A&Ms veneer of conservatism and Texas values smeared by so-called intellectuals bent on proselytizing on behalf of leftists/so-called progressive garbage. Enough with the grooming.

Hope they hire a real leader.

Sadly my AF retirement paperwork bear the stink of both Obama and Welsh.

I read as far as St. Hedwig, for one because I was going to say about the same thing minus any military service.
I thought in the beginning he was going to be a good hire, not a great one. But you have to remember when hiring for these positions the majority of the applicants are super liberal and from that side of academia.
Welsh did some good things here, no question. But he won't be remembered for them because of what he did.
Some have been asking what he did, not sure if anyone after Hedwig posted it. But this is what I have found.

In July when this all happened, he met with the girl who took the video. Remember there are about 10 videos out there and some of those kids are on the other side of the fence. The girl stated that she didn't think the content was correct for the class and that what was being taught was actually against state laws. Welsh told her that no one else had complained.(a complete lie) and she said really? Then he fessed up and said 4 others had complained. Then he tried to dress her down stating that she was going against the student handbook. I think in that statement he was referring to her videoing without permission. Welsh had every chance to do the right thing then and there, but he didn't, he took the side of the instructor and the dean of the dept. When the girl reached out to the people in State offices they were floored. As you know Harrison is an Ag.
Kids should not be afraid to stand up for what they believe in. I remember when this University stood up for the same things I believe in. It's just one of the many things I love about this special place. I did not attend A&M. But I love it just the same. And I hope the powers that be choose someone with the same high moral values and integrity that this great University deserves.
Welsh being an Obama appointee should have been the clue, but Sharp is in that boat, Perry was a Clinton guy, it's all academia left. You have to find the person that meets the values of this place and that will act and be open and serve accordingly. It's a rare find these days if you look to the folks in the normal area of expertise. Why I think they went with Welsh in the first place. But that was when Sharp was here. Hegar is going to be a guy I watch, being an Ag he should have some things to say about all of this. Lets see how all this pans out before the end of the year. But like a good football coach, there is a list of candidates a wish list if you want to call it that. We are the shinning light of University's, and now everyone knows what we will not tolerate and hopefully the likes of them will never apply here again.
Second Hardest Workin Man on Texags
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Time to find a better way
Drum5343
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Caesar4 said:

I don't really get why any kind of trans discussion/teaching was happening in a children's lit class in the first place. Seems quite wrong/inappropriate. Not sure about the legality but seems wrong to me. It shouldn't have come down to a legality question, it should have been intercepted/prevented before even having to come to that.

I also didn't get why the student referred to the "President's laws". That's kind of scary, as if she views the President as the law maker/dictator. That makes her sound like a lemming.


Yeah that's why my initial reaction to the videos was just "yuck". But sounds like from other things that I've read she had legitimate concerns even if she sounds kinda like a fascist reporting something to the party headquarters.
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The publicity regarding his DEI championing background and contempt for all who questioned it was very well document on this site, and this board, specifically, when he was nominated to be TAMU President. Everyone who was paying close attention learned to know him for who he is.

Not surprisingly, his public reprimand from Gov. Abbott in January was not a sufficient catalyst to change his ways. Moreover, his immediate termination/resignation very likely reflects his innate and stubborn defiance of the mandate emphasized by both the POTUS and the Governor.

https://www.houstonpublicmedia.org/articles/news/education-news/2025/01/15/510950/gov-greg-abbott-threatens-texas-am-presidents-job-over-claim-that-university-broke-dei-ban/

Do better, BOR.
LarryLayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?


Diversity for the sake of diversity is a race to the bottom.
Equity is the left taking from groups they deem oppressors and giving to the oppressed.
Inclusion is the immoral leftists deciding a new morality for everyone.
DEI is a cudgel used by the left to divide our country.

If you have two students seeking entrance into A&M. Both students are sane. Neither student is a lawbreaker. Outside of merit, since you believe in DEI, tell us what factors should decide which student is admitted?

greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LarryLayman said:

chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?


Diversity for the sake of diversity is a race to the bottom.
Equity is the left taking from groups they deem oppressors and giving to the oppressed.
Inclusion is the immoral leftists deciding a new morality for everyone.
DEI is a cudgel used by the left to divide our country.

If you have two students seeking entrance into A&M. Both students are sane. Neither student is a lawbreaker. Outside of merit, since you believe in DEI, tell us what factors should decide which student is admitted?


Texas law requires that top 10% of graduates at each high school be in effect eligible for admission. It was a political accommodation that does make room for minority students based on proven success at their high school. I'll note that law also applies to Texas but is capped at top 7% last I heard but is adjusted by the Texas Legislature.

I went to four high schools and 11 total schools due to family moves. I'll suggest that an objective standard like that is better than subjective ones like our holistic admissions process has used in the past. But it definitely decreased legacy admissions…
bryanw1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ToddyHill said:

Here's my recommendation for the next president.

Dr Ed Seidel



I ran into a (now) very highly placed Trump Administration official at the Missouri game last year, a month before the election, and he was not very impressed with Welsh, had not met him and had no desire to meet him. I knew he was on thin ice after that conversation, it was just a matter of an excuse to fire him for the past year.

With soon to be 9 Presidents in 19 years, I think that we need to work very hard to find somebody that the BoR will stand behind when the next controversy hits. We know that there will be controversies, and every time something comes up, some people are pissed off and some people are not, and the BoR fires the current warm body in the position. Let's find somebody we will support come Hell or High Water. Probably needs to be a former Student, probably somebody extremely conservative, bonus points if he/she was in the Corps b/c my fellow former cadets often have the loudest voices when complaining about things they don't like.
bryanw1995
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
themissinglink said:

I actually liked him quite a bit and disappointed to see him go. His position on the latest DEI incident actually made plenty of sense, but it angered both the far left and far right so he had very few allies.

It's fine to discuss DEI/LQBTQ stuff, but don't turn the classroom into an indoctrination camp. If you're going to teach it, it should be part of a gender studies program (or a minor part of the course curriculum) and leave it open for debate.

If you take a children's literature class and 75% of the content is gender studies crap, the professor should rename it "LGBTQ children's literature" and describe it as such in the course catalog. Failure to properly name it and describe it in the catalog should get you fired, especially if you've been asked to fix it.

The left hates that a professor got fired for hijacking a children's literature class and turning it into a woke indoctrination camp, and the right hates that people are allowed to even discuss woke crap.

I hope our university will stand up for the free exchange of ideas, even the one that are stupid and dumb (so they can be laughed at and ridiculed instead of banned).

Well thought out posts like this have no place in internet discussions like this. You must be either extremely Woke or extremely MAGA, there's no in between. /sarcasm

Ironically, I posted that and it reminded me why I dislike extremists of all stripes so much. The "you're either with us or against us crap" has dominated colleges and Universities for basically my entire life. Schools just have different topics that are off limits today than the old topics that were off limits. Are we sending our children to college to get indoctrinated into woke-ism, into becoming MAGA warriors, or do we want them to learn to think for themselves after seeing and experiencing a variety of viewpoints during their college years? For too long it was door #1, now it's swung to door #2, when door #3 is probably the choice that most would choose for their kids.
LarryLayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
greg.w.h said:

LarryLayman said:

chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?


Diversity for the sake of diversity is a race to the bottom.
Equity is the left taking from groups they deem oppressors and giving to the oppressed.
Inclusion is the immoral leftists deciding a new morality for everyone.
DEI is a cudgel used by the left to divide our country.

If you have two students seeking entrance into A&M. Both students are sane. Neither student is a lawbreaker. Outside of merit, since you believe in DEI, tell us what factors should decide which student is admitted?


Texas law requires that top 10% of graduates at each high school be in effect eligible for admission. It was a political accommodation that does make room for minority students based on proven success at their high school. I'll note that law also applies to Texas but is capped at top 7% last I heard but is adjusted by the Texas Legislature.

I went to four high schools and 11 total schools due to family moves. I'll suggest that an objective standard like that is better than subjective ones like our holistic admissions process has used in the past. But it definitely decreased legacy admissions…



Top ten, seven or whatever is used is not a valid comparison between two students, no matter what anyone hopes or wishes. Hence the need for standardized tests so that students can be compared apples to apples.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LarryLayman said:

greg.w.h said:

LarryLayman said:

chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?


Diversity for the sake of diversity is a race to the bottom.
Equity is the left taking from groups they deem oppressors and giving to the oppressed.
Inclusion is the immoral leftists deciding a new morality for everyone.
DEI is a cudgel used by the left to divide our country.

If you have two students seeking entrance into A&M. Both students are sane. Neither student is a lawbreaker. Outside of merit, since you believe in DEI, tell us what factors should decide which student is admitted?


Texas law requires that top 10% of graduates at each high school be in effect eligible for admission. It was a political accommodation that does make room for minority students based on proven success at their high school. I'll note that law also applies to Texas but is capped at top 7% last I heard but is adjusted by the Texas Legislature.

I went to four high schools and 11 total schools due to family moves. I'll suggest that an objective standard like that is better than subjective ones like our holistic admissions process has used in the past. But it definitely decreased legacy admissions…



Top ten, seven or whatever is used is not a valid comparison between two students, no matter what anyone hopes or wishes. Hence the need for standardized tests so that students can be compared apples to apples.
You say it isn't valid. But it is statutory law. So try interacting with it without adding wish fulfillment to sidestep it.
Hill08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you're a supporter of DEI, you shouldn't be leading anything. BYE
JPK89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those angry here think there's more than two genders.

Those happy here know there's only two genders.

I'm in the happy camp.
Canyon99
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He shouldn't have been hired in the first place.
cupcakesprinkles
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
InfantryAg said:

chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?

I have to wonder if your just spreading the propaganda, or are just ignorant as to this marxist tripe.

antifa is not actually against fascism. They just want their brand of authoritarianism so they can rule like the fascists would. DEI doesn't really stand for true diversity and equity is a garbage concept.

Diversity to the left means people of different races, ethnicity and gender, but they must have group think. Anyone outside the group think is considered bad, even if they're a minority (see Thomas Sowell for one example).

To normal people, diversity is the having differing views, that contribute towards a common goal. Some would call this, diversity of thought. It doesn't separate people into groups based on their race, ethnicity or gender.

Equity means everyone has equal outcomes, regardless of merit. This means a less capable person is promoted over a more capable person, if they meet the lefts fallacious definition of diversity. It's handicapping A and B students and giving unearned extra credit to D and F students, to make everyone a C student; Equity. This takes away any incentive to do better and be better, for everyone. The left calls this fair.

Inclusion is a made up problem. People can freely associate with who they want. Any efficient business is hiring a workforce based on productivity, not trying to exclude anyone. Where is inclusivity not practiced in this country? How would you propose this is "fixed?"

The left may steal the language, but they can't change reality.

Our soon the be former President had to pick a side, be part of the problem or part of the solution. He chose poorly.

That is a perfect explanation!
LarryLayman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
greg.w.h said:

LarryLayman said:

greg.w.h said:

LarryLayman said:

chrisocker said:

Jbob04 said:

Excellent news!! No room for DEI at A&M and the way he mishandled the drama with the transgender bs, it was time for him to go. Never should have been hired

What part of DEI do you disagree with? Is it diversity, equity, or inclusion? Those are the words that make up DEI. Let us all know which of those three you think have no room at A&M. Oh boy, it's not all three, is it?


Diversity for the sake of diversity is a race to the bottom.
Equity is the left taking from groups they deem oppressors and giving to the oppressed.
Inclusion is the immoral leftists deciding a new morality for everyone.
DEI is a cudgel used by the left to divide our country.

If you have two students seeking entrance into A&M. Both students are sane. Neither student is a lawbreaker. Outside of merit, since you believe in DEI, tell us what factors should decide which student is admitted?


Texas law requires that top 10% of graduates at each high school be in effect eligible for admission. It was a political accommodation that does make room for minority students based on proven success at their high school. I'll note that law also applies to Texas but is capped at top 7% last I heard but is adjusted by the Texas Legislature.

I went to four high schools and 11 total schools due to family moves. I'll suggest that an objective standard like that is better than subjective ones like our holistic admissions process has used in the past. But it definitely decreased legacy admissions…



Top ten, seven or whatever is used is not a valid comparison between two students, no matter what anyone hopes or wishes. Hence the need for standardized tests so that students can be compared apples to apples.
You say it isn't valid. But it is statutory law. So try interacting with it without adding wish fulfillment to sidestep it.


Yes, it is the law, and the school has to comply. Even more reason to do away with DEI at Texas A&M.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.