AgLiving06 said:
The Banned said:
dermdoc said:
AgLiving06 said:
dermdoc said:
AgLiving06 said:
We confess this or something like this nearly every Sunday:
Quote:
Most merciful God, we confess that we are by nature sinful and unclean. We have sinned against You in thought, word, and deed, by what we have done and by what we have left undone. We have not loved You with our whole heart; we have not loved our neighbors as ourselves. We justly deserve Your present and eternal punishment. For the sake of Your Son, Jesus Christ, have mercy on us. Forgive us, renew us, and lead us, so that we may delight in Your will and walk in Your ways to the glory of Your holy name. Amen.
So do you believe God sends people to hell? Or they choose hell?
I'm not the OP, but I'm not going to entertain your effort to derail the thread.
You know my position. It's the Lutheran and historical view.
And I agree with that if it means people have free will and the ability to accept or reject God. I just do not think punishment is eternal and is meant for rehab not punitive.
I will post nothing else. Sorry.
This is the most interesting thing part of Luther's theology. You can't really "accept" God because that would mean there is an act of the human will that leads to salvation. He contended that you could only really reject God's grace.
The obvious logical fallacy that this view makes is why Calvin got to double predestination/limited atonement so quickly after the reformation started.
Calvin gets to double predestination through Augustine (for right or wrong).
That it occurred around the the time of the Reformation is really not relevant.
Luther relied on Augustine for his view on predestination as well. It's Luther's emphasis on monergism and total rejection of any kind of salvific synergism (which Augustine does not totally reject) that leads to the ultimate conclusion of double predestination.
The example for how salvation works that I've heard Lutheran theologians use is the idea of a person waking up on a hospital bed with a life saving IV in their arm. They didn't put the IV there. They did nothing to merit the IV. They simply have the life saving IV. The work is already done by the efforts of another. But they still have the choice to pull the IV out and die if they so choose. The choice is do nothing or pull the IV out.
The problem with this is that choices don't work that way. By definition, if I choose not to pull the IV out, I am
also choosing to leave the IV in. It has to work in both directions. My choice isn't to do nothing or pull the IV out. It's leave the IV in or take the IV out. Both are active choices that I make. But this means that our cooperation is required to receive and stay in God's grace. Luther rejects this. Augustine did not.
We can't reject something we aren't capable of accepting. If man has no role in accepting God's grace, then man has no role in rejecting God's grace. Therefore, if you are not saved by God's grace it's because He never gave it to you. That is double predestination. Calvin picks up Luther's torch of monergism only and takes it to the finish line.
I know I've totally thread derailed. Feel free to have the last word and if I feel a response is beneficial, I'll move it to a new thread.