2 for this particular problem.Decay said:
Man I really hope they figured out the fire issue. Obv they're throwing everything they can at getting these flyable but they've lost three otherwise successful Ships before even passing Florida.
They...xerox'd the whole playbook, 😏
— Human being 📐 (@simplehumanhaha) May 5, 2025
Orbital fuel depots are going to be wild in the future. pic.twitter.com/Ny97V7dESX
— Eric Thiel (@Space_Strategy) May 6, 2025
Rare asteroid impact on the moon in stunning telescope footage. pic.twitter.com/1DW0xSEoNu
— Daily Mail Online (@MailOnline) May 6, 2025
A Japanese astronomer captured footage of a #meteorite hitting the Moon, causing a visible flash on the lunar surface. The impact occurred near Ideler L crater and could have formed a crater about 39 feet in diameter.
— Erika (@ExploreCosmos_) March 11, 2023
©️ Daichi Fujii, curator of the Hiratsuka City Museum. pic.twitter.com/o9GNf5WKnN
Ship 35 aborted an attempt to Static Fire at Masseys. Looks like the deluge fired up before an abort was called.
— NSF - NASASpaceflight.com (@NASASpaceflight) May 11, 2025
LIVE on X and YT: https://t.co/yU3KaU8eGi pic.twitter.com/kgHtywHhvT
Full single view replay: pic.twitter.com/W8sRkPfFYL
— NSF - NASASpaceflight.com (@NASASpaceflight) May 12, 2025
Jeff Bezos and his Blue Origin project couldn’t be more full of BS…
— Isaac’s Army (@ReturnOfKappy) May 11, 2025
Airplane door vs Blue Origin door..👀 pic.twitter.com/57dRFWQR9t
B787 Passenger Door
— aircraftmaintenancengineer (@airmainengineer) May 12, 2025
Vent flap- The passenger entry door vent flap prevents airplane pressurisation if PED is not locked. Prevents operation of the PED if the pressure is too high for safe operation. Releases the remaining pressure to prevent damage when you unlatch the PED.… pic.twitter.com/AzXBgrGdAg
Do tell. But it will be pretty obvious very quickly whether you're describing something JWST can even do...Stat Monitor Repairman said:
So this JWST tracking an object headed towards earth is off limits then, or no?
And here we go.
— Adrian Beil (@BCCarCounters) May 13, 2025
Booster 14-2 on the Pad.
Ship 35 back in Mega Bay 2 for final checkouts.
This is your Flight 9 Stack, currently targeting May 21. pic.twitter.com/ZvxbxkAv2j
Starship completed a long duration six-engine static fire and is undergoing final preparations for the ninth flight test pic.twitter.com/o3WWjwtFre
— SpaceX (@SpaceX) May 13, 2025
Here’s what a Moon and Mars program would look like without SLS and Orion. https://t.co/6TtgGPKLii
— Eric Berger (@SciGuySpace) May 13, 2025
More at the link.Quote:
After the Artemis III mission the natural question is, what would come next if the SLS rocket and Orion spacecraft are canceled?
The most likely answer is that NASA turns to an old but successful playbook: COTS. This stands for Commercial Orbital Transportation System and was created by NASA two decades ago to develop cargo transport systems (eventually this became SpaceX's Dragon and Northrop's Cygnus spacecraft) for the International Space Station. Since then, NASA has adopted this same model for crew services as well as other commercial programs.
Under the COTS model, NASA provides funding and guidance to private companies to develop their own spacecraft, rockets, and services, and then buys those at a "market" rate.
The idea of a Lunar COTS program is not new. NASA employees explored the concept in a research paper a decade ago, finding that "a future (Lunar) COTS program has the great potential of enabling development of cost-effective, commercial capabilities and establishing a thriving cislunar economy which will lead the way to an economical and sustainable approach for future human missions to Mars."
Sources indicate NASA would go to industry and seek an "end-to-end" solution for lunar missions. That is, an integrated plan to launch astronauts from Earth, land them on the Moon, and return them to Earth. One of the bidders would certainly be SpaceX, with its Starship vehicle already having been validated during the Artemis III mission. Crews could launch from Earth either in Dragon or Starship. Blue Origin is the other obvious bidder. The company might partner with Lockheed Martin to commercialize the Orion spacecraft or use the crew vehicle it is developing internally.
Other companies could also participate. The point is that NASA would seek to buy astronaut transportation to the Moon, just as it already is doing with cargo and science experiments through the Commercial Lunar Payload Services program.
Needs more of a penls shape.PJYoung said:Starship completed a long duration six-engine static fire and is undergoing final preparations for the ninth flight test pic.twitter.com/o3WWjwtFre
— SpaceX (@SpaceX) May 13, 2025
nortex97 said:
I think it's just simpler/cheaper. And only a few bozo's to come out so no need for the complication of making it open outward. His theatrics of opening it from the outside of course were clownish. Commercial airliner doors are actually fascinatingly complex in their engineering, imho, as they have to work incredibly reliably for a really, really long time.
There's a lot 'under the skin' that we don't really appreciate as pax:B787 Passenger Door
— aircraftmaintenancengineer (@airmainengineer) May 12, 2025
Vent flap- The passenger entry door vent flap prevents airplane pressurisation if PED is not locked. Prevents operation of the PED if the pressure is too high for safe operation. Releases the remaining pressure to prevent damage when you unlatch the PED.… pic.twitter.com/AzXBgrGdAg
SPACEX: There won't be a catch for the booster on Flight 9 opting instead for a landing in the Gulf of America. https://t.co/UPTHF2UrIh
— @amuse (@amuse) May 16, 2025
Elon's said that rockets in the rocket garden are kinda more trouble than they're worth and he doesn't mind when one explodes during flight so they don't have to worry about recovering anything. I do think they should continue to keep notable milestones once they're done testing but in 20 years nobody will care what happened to the hardware from one of the intermediate tests.nortex97 said:SPACEX: There won't be a catch for the booster on Flight 9 opting instead for a landing in the Gulf of America. https://t.co/UPTHF2UrIh
— @amuse (@amuse) May 16, 2025
Disappointing. The booster catch was the best part of the past few launches. Oh well. I think they have the next few boosters with some improvements already prepped or nearly ready anyway.
Super Heavy Flight 4 booster being pulled from the sea pic.twitter.com/dIslFgsbfT
— Dima Zeniuk (@DimaZeniuk) May 19, 2025
“Golden Dome” announcements by President Trump, key legislators this afternoon.
— Hugh Hewitt (@hughhewitt) May 20, 2025
“SpaceX is teaming up with software maker Palantir and defense technology company Anduril for a joint bid, with all three of the companies having met with top officials in the Trump administration…