None of this makes sense to me, other than Candace glomming onto some salacious reporting by someone else to amplify it/herself.

Why did they (Macrons) file suit against her in the US? I have no idea. I can't even fathom it. She's a speck on the world stage. In any lawsuit usually it's best to try to figure out the 'win' for each side, and in this case I can't get there. They are functionally paying her, and selling the book 'becoming Brigitte' etc.

I admit to having no clue here, waiting to read/hear of a credible theory, in all honesty.

Im Gipper said:

---

You think they filed knowing she's really Ladyboy Macron?

---

Im Gipper said:

---

its folly to try to conclude that based on whether a lawsuit is filed is determinative of truth.

---

Is this where you put your lawyer hat on and claim you werent "concluding" Macron is telling truth about being a woman.....you were just implying its likely she is telling truth, bc she wouldnt file a lawsuit otherwise.

What are you babbling about?

My guess is Macron has proof she's a woman or she would not have filed this lawsuit. My guess is not determinative of anything.

You'll have to try harder on the wierd "gotcha" attempts.

There's definitely a strong Streisand effect here! (Maybe the Yentyl variety if you know what I mean! lol)

So predictable, lol...."I wasnt making a determination Macron might be telling truth bc she filed a lawsuit, I was just making a guess she is telling truth bc she filed a lawsuit"

When someone else makes a point about a lawsuit filing legitimizing their claim, you call it "folly". When you do it, its not folly, bc you are merely "guessing".

You are making less and less sense. Drinking I presume. Stop derailing

I never said Macron filing legitimized anting. Keep trying weirdo. You'll "gotcha" someone eventually!

You did almost exactly what you criticized someone else of doing in pointing to a lawsuit filing as an indication of truth. But because it wasnt exactly the same wording, you tried to claim it was completely different.

Again, people like you are the reason lawyer jokes exist.

Now you are just lying. Desperation is an ugly look. Im done with this derail, you can keep making sh*t up if you want. Your "gotcha" want even close. Guess you are still mad about getting destroyed on the Iran and Epstein threads.

Nope. This is a thread about whether or not Macron is a man or a woman, and how her lawsuit might relate to that quesiton.

There is no defending your own words on the subject at hand. No attempt to derail will change this image of your OWN contradicting words.

The Macrons have made their bed and there's no coming back from this. Once they file the lawsuit they're done unless they are 100% truthful and she is 100% born a female anything other than that and they're screwed because if they drop the lawsuit, Scarlet letter if they refuse the blood test, same answer There's no going back now. This was the stupidest move. Whoever made the decision or whoever was counseling them at the PR firm that they hired here in the United States, who took attorneys and went and filed better have the truth on their side. This lawsuit is the stupidest move ever.

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

The Macrons have made their bed and there's no coming back from this. Once they file the lawsuit they're done unless they are 100% truthful and she is 100% born a female anything other than that and they're screwed because if they drop the lawsuit, Scarlet letter if they refuse the blood test, same answer There's no going back now. This was the stupidest move. Whoever made the decision or whoever was counseling them at the PR firm that they hired here in the United States, who took attorneys and went and filed better have the truth on their side. This lawsuit is the stupidest move ever.

---

Or, and hear me about because this is wild…..she's actually just a woman and this is an easy slam dunk W.

You've seen 'her' right?

MaxPower said:

---

Dirty_Mike&the_boys said:

---

The Macrons have made their bed and there's no coming back from this. Once they file the lawsuit they're done unless they are 100% truthful and she is 100% born a female anything other than that and they're screwed because if they drop the lawsuit, Scarlet letter if they refuse the blood test, same answer There's no going back now. This was the stupidest move. Whoever made the decision or whoever was counseling them at the PR firm that they hired here in the United States, who took attorneys and went and filed better have the truth on their side. This lawsuit is the stupidest move ever.

---

Or, and hear me about because this is wild…..she's actually just a woman and this is an easy slam dunk W.

---

Okay what's the "Win" in this case?

Given your hypothetical she turns out to be a woman from birth and they are able to ruin the reputation of a podcaster? What about her/him grooming her 14 year old boy student when she was a 39 year old married teacher be exposed in court on the record? Is that a "Win"? Regardless of her blood test results she's going to be a documented pedophile under oath on the record. What a "Win"

anything is possible, but it seems extremely unlikely that they would file this lawsuit if brigette was really a man.

agree with the posters above that are scratching their head on the "why bother?" Its just gives owens the attention and notoriety she is seeking.

I have a question about this crazy ass conspiracy... So from what I understand Candace claims Brigette is actually her brother. So where is Brigette's brother then if it's not true? Wouldn't the whole theory collapse if he made a public appearance? It seems like he is a ghost.

Go to the 9:51 mark and watch the Video Rogan is talking about

Gig em G said:

---

I have a question about this crazy ass conspiracy... So from what I understand Candace claims Brigette is actually her brother. So where is Brigette's brother then if it's not true? Wouldn't the whole theory collapse if he made a public appearance? It seems like he is a ghost.

---

Yeah, it seems really easy to disprove, doesn't it???

I think what's driving Candace is all the normal stuff that's just missing from bridgets background.

nortex97 said:

---

None of this makes sense to me, other than Candace glomming onto some salacious reporting by someone else to amplify it/herself.

Why did they (Macrons) file suit against her in the US? I have no idea. I can't even fathom it. She's a speck on the world stage. In any lawsuit usually it's best to try to figure out the 'win' for each side, and in this case I can't get there. They are functionally paying her, and selling the book 'becoming Brigitte' etc.

I admit to having no clue here, waiting to read/hear of a credible theory, in all honesty.

---

maybe to bankrupt that insane maniac Candace Owens

like they did with her fellow insane maniac Alex Jones

Farmer_J said:

---

Gig em G said:

---

I have a question about this crazy ass conspiracy... So from what I understand Candace claims Brigette is actually her brother. So where is Brigette's brother then if it's not true? Wouldn't the whole theory collapse if he made a public appearance? It seems like he is a ghost.

---

Yeah, it seems really easy to disprove, doesn't it???

I think what's driving Candace is all the normal stuff that's just missing from bridgets background.

---

What's driving Candace is what is always driving her - Saying stupid **** for money and attention.

Definitely strange! t is very strange that you can't even really find any photos of the brother through Google. Maybe he is super super private, but that would only explain there not being lots of pictures. You really can't find any!

Im Gipper said:

---

Definitely strange! t is very strange that you can't even really find any photos of the brother through Google. Maybe he is super super private, but that would only explain there not being lots of pictures. You really can't find any!

---

now try to find pictures of Big Mike pregnant

Farmer_J said:

---

David_Puddy said:

---

Daddy said:

---

Ag_0112358132134 said:

---

I think Candace Owens is hot and I would for sure do her. I also agree with her politics generally. But in spite of those things, she still gets on my nerves. She needs to learn how to be tactful and and speak purposefully without coming across as an abrasive loudmouth.

---

Why?

So you get butterflies on your stomach?

But go online should be to seek truth pursue excellence

Is she speaking the truth or not should be the only goal you have. Not getting into your feelings not getting the weather she's tactful or not. That's what the last said about Trump and you see how much kicking ass he's doing

---

She is bat sh-t crazy. She got popular because she was a "strong black conservative woman" who wasn't afraid to speak her mind. Once she got a bunch of fame and notoriety, she dove into the celeb BS that only the uneducated care about. Now she's doing a complete 180 on Trump simply because she hates Jews. She's a lunatic and it wouldn't surprise me one bit to hear that some rich Dem donor gave her a bunch of money to do a complete 180 and create divide within the Republican Party. I mean imagine grifting for a country like Iran.

---

What has she been wrong about? And not just opinions you don't like. What has she been factually wrong about.

She's made a pretty good case about the macrons. Even if candace is wrong about the trans thing, the backstory about their relationship is weird and groomerish. The way the macrones have handled it, is very suspicious. In a world where almost every european leader protects pedophiles, i'm inclined to go with candace on this one.

---

Might want to read my post again champ. Where did I say that she was wrong? She is definitely still BSC, and I'm really not sure what her end goal is here......do you? So what if she was born a dude......how does that affect anything American related? I'm also skeptical that Michelle Obama is a woman as well, but she's never brought that up. Again, what is the end goal in all of this? I fail to see how she generates any additional income for herself by continuing to fight this battle.

Your post makes no sense.

Macron's wife is an adult female. Look at the hands. They don't lie.

It is what bust 99% of the troons.

Went on Tucker breaking things down. Candace basically says the other lawsuit allegations twist her words, that they were sloppy on those. She is doubling down on her central claim about B Macron being a man.

Keeps saying no one will go under oath, provide photos, blood test, or any other hard evidence to disprove her.

Id put a small bet on Macron being a dude. Anybody know where I can do that?

Id put a much larger bet on Macron losing the suit.

Owens has spent weeks calling Trump a traitor and suggesting he was covering up a pedophile ring as a favor to his Jewish daughter/son-in-law, but now she wants him to save her from a valid defamation suit she brought upon herself with constant lies. https://t.co/oMLrzkQxH5

— AG (@AGHamilton29) August 7, 2025

She still thinks she has absolute freedom to say whatever she wants, without consequences.

It was the same thing with her "Christ is King" shtick.

The 1st Amendment only ensures the government cannot silence someone (other than certain things like making threats, slander, perjury, and the like), but it does not protect someone being being fired, being sued, or being publicly shamed for what they said.

The sooner she disappears, the better, but as long as she has her core following (mostly the antisemites on the right), she'll stick around.

Farmer_J said:

---

Your post makes no sense.

---

How so?

Help me Trump and Bondi! "Foreign invaders" are threatening my 1A rights!

Yep, the left is notorious for conflating 1A protection from gov, with protection from private litigation. Now Owens is doing it.

Few days ago, Owens went on Piers Morgan and she said "I stake my career on this claim". I wonder what that means.

She goes away if wrong?
Or
She takes her lumps, loses much of her following, and tries to save face?

It does look like a major change of tone in that latest video. If proven wrong, I could see her saying "well, its not illegal to be wrong, we arent perfect, I cant get everything right". But short of a DNA test, I dont see that happening.

I used to lean towards B. Macron being a man, bc its so easy to disprove. But starting to look like they may be giving her enough rope to hang herself.

I truly don't understand who's still following her and why. I guess I've been surprised before by the depths of lunacy of men, but her meandering path through conflicting ideologies should have shed a ton of folks. I get that there's profit in the margins, but abandoning conservative prominence to wallow in a rightish wing fringe is a weird choice. I'm curious if some entity(s) started paying her to shift her punditry and she's kept going wackier as the checks kept clearing.