flown-the-coop said:

---

74OA said:

---

Dorm 15 said:

---

Wasn't the DOJ supposer to comply with the Judge.s order today?

---

ABC: DOJ still STONEWALLING.

---

Interesting its titled as "stonewalling", which is certainly a perspective.

The DOJ explains very clearly their legal position. What some may call "stonewalling", the reality is that it is a valid legal position and even if it made sense to be responsive it would set horrible precedent.

Quote:

---

The Department of Justice on Thursday declined to turn over additional information from the Epstein files as ordered by a judge, arguing the materials include sensitive victim information or were appropriately redacted as required by law.

Hours ahead of the deadline to turn over the materials or explain why they were properly withheld, Associate U.S. Attorney General Stanley Woodward asked the judge to delay the deadline by 60 days or disregard it entirely by accepting the DOJ's reasons for withholding the materials.

"Although the Government strongly disagrees with the Court's ruling that the [Epstein Files Transparency Act] is enforceable by private parties through the Administrative Procedure Act, the Government welcomes this opportunity to resolve any confusion regarding the records at issue in this case," Woodward wrote.

---

---

Queso1 said:

---

Sure, brother. Keep believing it. Be safe and get vaxxed.

---