ts5641 said:

---

Does all this change the chumps who still post and say things about Trump and Putin?

---

Those folks have a lower IQ than Biden. Ignore them.

For years, even up to now, the Mueller Report has been accepted by both sides as accurate evidence. The right has argued it didnt prove Russia Collusion, instead of arguing it was mostly manufactured "evidence". I expect that changes soon with the Durham annex Ratcliffe is about to release.

Dan Goldman is one of the worst Russia Gate perps. He tried to shame witnesses for not accepting Muller "findings" as fact. Like Covidians did with their BS. He then tries to claim FBI was merely making recs to Zuck and Twitter, instead of directing them, as Zuck later confirmed on Rogan.

Richleau12 said:

---

Soon the DNC server will come into the fold and the bombshell of who killed Seth Rich. I wonder what Julian Assange is up to...hm. Maybe he makes a reappearance.

---

I believe in the stuff just released that the investigation concluded since the download time was so fast, It had to be an inside job. ie Seth Rich

Assange didnt go as far as confirming its Seth, he did confirm his source was NOT any state actor like Russia as the Mueller report claimed. Crowdstrike also admitted they had no actual evidence it was Russia, just supposed "circumstantial" evidence. So there was ZERO forensic evidence to tie the email hacking to Russia. The DNC dirt was more about exposing the Bernie railroading, as emails were stolen back in March 2016, well before Trump was the GOP nom. That aligns with Seth, who was an anti-establishment Bernie bro, focused on voter rights....and presumably angry both primary voters and Bernie were getting screwed.

Assange could definitively prove it either way, but he also loves his freedom and family, and has many other sources to honor. But just maybe one day we will find out...

It would be nice if Assange would reveal what he knows, but either way, anyone who cares and is paying attention at this point recognizes it wasn't Russia who hacked her emails.

Not for nothing, but in truth, we haven’t seen the slightest EVIDENCE that Russia stole Hillary’s or the DNC’s emails in 2016. Not a poppyseed. Literally every “fact” is the IC or a paid DNC vendor making an allegation, or someone citing to and agreeing with them. The actual… pic.twitter.com/TFf84dy5Ba

— Brennan’sOrangeJumpsuit (@15poundstogo) July 30, 2025

Love that x account handle, LOL.

annie88 said:

---

We all remember this…

So this was true.
Footage from Rudy Giuliani. pic.twitter.com/mJCxEo072I

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) July 23, 2025

---

Also hard to believe… wasn't this 2015 or 2016?

9/11/2016

FriendlyAg said:

---

annie88 said:

---

We all remember this…

So this was true.
Footage from Rudy Giuliani. pic.twitter.com/mJCxEo072I

— Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) July 23, 2025

---

Also hard to believe… wasn't this 2015 or 2016?

---

Frightening how close we came to that hag being president. She would've set us back hard. She's the most corrupted leftist in American history.

The plan was to have Crowdstrike feed lies to the media and FBI-adjunct all along.

Regarding proving-up the DNC/DCCC hack and leak -

"In absence of direct evidence, Crowdstrike and ThreatConnect will supply the media" with info.

Crowdstrike will feed the info to the FBI and then the info "would then be disseminated through leading US publications." pic.twitter.com/zT7T4REqIt

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) July 31, 2025

Democrats are an enemy of the republic.

FobTies said:

---

Assange didnt go as far as confirming its Seth, he did confirm his source was NOT any state actor like Russia as the Mueller report claimed. Crowdstrike also admitted they had no actual evidence it was Russia, just supposed "circumstantial" evidence. So there was ZERO forensic evidence to tie the email hacking to Russia. The DNC dirt was more about exposing the Bernie railroading, as emails were stolen back in March 2016, well before Trump was the GOP nom. That aligns with Seth, who was an anti-establishment Bernie bro, focused on voter rights....and presumably angry both primary voters and Bernie were getting screwed.

Assange could definitively prove it either way, but he also loves his freedom and family, and has many other sources to honor. But just maybe one day we will find out...

---

I get protecting sources but Seth is dead. Assange released the documents so that "the world would know." Why not release that it was Seth Rich or that it wasn't so that the world knows?

I was thinking the same thing. Its a good questio.

The Rich family sued FNC over wikileaks speculation. So maybe there are some legal hurdles/concerns for Assange. Im also not totally sure there isnt an anonymous method to leak to Assange, where he may be confident it was Rich, but cant actually prove it.

I wonder if Crowdstrike gets exposed in coming weeks and months. Maybe it gets proven their chief security officer (Shawn Henry) is a political hack that used the business to help spread falsehoods that undermined a duly elected POTUS. Could be like an accounting firm getting caught doing unethical practices.

Yeah, that Seth Rich stuff is interesting. Now it could've just been a random act of crime. Sometimes Occam's razor is it. But it is a weird case. I watched a documentary on it recently and who knows. I doubt we'll ever know.

FobTies said:

---

I was thinking the same thing. Its a good questio.

The Rich family sued FNC over wikileaks speculation. So maybe there are some legal hurdles/concerns for Assange. Im also not totally sure there isnt an anonymous method to leak to Assange, where he may be confident it was Rich, but cant actually prove it.

---

That may be true. If Assange has no method to prove it was Seth, he would be wise to keep his mouth shut.

BUT, if the Rich Family has been contacted right after his death by cell phone or other method by someone connected to Hillary? Game on.

IYKYK

Is that the same person who created the story about Kamala's Iowa polling. Democrats live on propaganda.