A couple of interesting items on the agenda…namely flood emergency planning and THC issue.
Curious what folks think the outcome will be.
I am guessing there is pressure for them to provide studies and funding for mitigation in the flood issue. So I expect them to throw money at it, but I hope they are strategic about how it's done.
On the THC, I am not sure what to expect. Since the bill was voted through and then vetoed, what is the next step in reaching conclusion? Do they have another vote?
Curious what folks think the outcome will be.
I am guessing there is pressure for them to provide studies and funding for mitigation in the flood issue. So I expect them to throw money at it, but I hope they are strategic about how it's done.
On the THC, I am not sure what to expect. Since the bill was voted through and then vetoed, what is the next step in reaching conclusion? Do they have another vote?