Captn_Ag05 said:
Surely you, the prominent bar and restaurant guy in town, don't know more about the bar business than random internet guy.
Well I do often refer to myself as an over glorified pizza cook.
Captn_Ag05 said:
Surely you, the prominent bar and restaurant guy in town, don't know more about the bar business than random internet guy.
Bob Yancy said:
Fix the broken planters. Fix the rusty promenade shade structures. Fix the unsightly beds in front of the parking garage. Resurface the city surface lot. Spruce up the city parking garage.
TXAG 05 said:Bob Yancy said:
Fix the broken planters. Fix the rusty promenade shade structures. Fix the unsightly beds in front of the parking garage. Resurface the city surface lot. Spruce up the city parking garage.
Shouldn't the city be doing that anyway?
Bob Yancy said:
Organic entertainment districts are nothing if not survivors. They persist because they are ingrained in culture in a way outsiders can't understand and insiders cannot explain.
Northgate epitomizes this.
City hall needs to enhance Northgate with upgrades and sculpture; maintain Northgate and put a police substation there and I imagine everything will be fine.
We haven't fought this hard only to give up!
Gig 'em
Yancy '95
Captn_Ag05 said:
Here's what AI did with the parking lot area from the presentations and discussions at the council meeting.
Any lost city revenue from less parking spots would be made up in ticketing all these cars that are parked over the lines.
Captn_Ag05 said:
Even if they do an overlay of the "core" northgate area limiting the height, there is still quite a bit of area that is available for development for additional high rise housing. For example, the old FedEx/Kinkos lot at University and Stasney, all of the land bound by First, Louise, Spruce, and Boyett, etc. Plus, more opportunity to advance into Bryan.
Dr. Horrible said:
Watching some of the video now (thanks for posting). Might be unrelated, but is there any pushback on TAMU that can happen to accommodate some of the needed growth? My specific thought is that a huge part of the need for some of this high-rise development so close to campus is that TAMU has not kept up with the university planned growth with a proportionate growth in campus housing, effectively shifting that demand to Northgate and other campus adjacent locations. I know this isn't the only problem, but it's just something I'd been thinking about lately.
Gator92 said:
You used this "organic" term as if Northgate has been some notorious landmark for all time.
Truth is outside of the Chicken and Dudley's, Northgate hasn't been anything. I guess you can include Freebirds. I remember when it opened. I spent a couple hours waiting in line for a "free bird" the day it opened. How many places have come and gone there in just the past 10 years? How much vacancy is there at the ground floor retail spaces created by the high rises? What is the price/square?
Bob Yancy said:
Thoughts? Keep it constructive please.
Gator92 said:Bob Yancy said:
Organic entertainment districts are nothing if not survivors. They persist because they are ingrained in culture in a way outsiders can't understand and insiders cannot explain.
Northgate epitomizes this.
City hall needs to enhance Northgate with upgrades and sculpture; maintain Northgate and put a police substation there and I imagine everything will be fine.
We haven't fought this hard only to give up!
Gig 'em
Yancy '95
You used this "organic" term as if Northgate has been some notorious landmark for all time.
Truth is outside of the Chicken and Dudley's, Northgate hasn't been anything. I guess you can include Freebirds. I remember when it opened. I spent a couple hours waiting in line for a "free bird" the day it opened. How many places have come and gone there in just the past 10 years? How much vacancy is there at the ground floor retail spaces created by the high rises? What is the price/square?
I live in Katy. If you don't want to hear from a parent of a student that has lived in a high rise at NG, then move on. Oh, and I have another that will start this fall. Living on campus. Living on campus mostly b/c every fish must have a campus meal plan of crappy choices.
What NG desperately needs is a grocery store. My son has to goto the zoo that is HEB in Bryan. Or Costco. He hates NG. He'll tell you that if your male and underage, you can't hardly get into the bars at NG. So, he doesn't even try. He'll tell you that if you are female, you won't get carded and will be ushered to the front of the line. He'll also tell you that the demographic living at NG doesn't look like him. And that's putting it nicely. There isn't really that much to eat around and what there is is super expensive.
He and his room mates are super happy that they've rented a house south of campus in CS near the CS HEB on Wellborn. Even though NG is super convenient to campus where he can roll out of the rack 10min before class. I'm glad too. Gonna save me over $400/mo in rent.
Another thing. The high rise he's currently in till August, offered a free month of rent and $700 cash if he renewed. I'm guessing sign of the times since so many beds will debut this fall. The one he is in was sold this past spring and has changed management. The rooms are nice, but the amenities need some upgrades and maintenance. With so many being built, this place and others could quickly become a real problem...
Gator92 said:Dr. Horrible said:
Watching some of the video now (thanks for posting). Might be unrelated, but is there any pushback on TAMU that can happen to accommodate some of the needed growth? My specific thought is that a huge part of the need for some of this high-rise development so close to campus is that TAMU has not kept up with the university planned growth with a proportionate growth in campus housing, effectively shifting that demand to Northgate and other campus adjacent locations. I know this isn't the only problem, but it's just something I'd been thinking about lately.
Has to be part of the plan. TAMU cancelled or delayed plans for on campus housing. Hullabaloo hall is the only on campus housing where you get your own bathroom. All the new rooms at NG feature your own bathroom. Living at Hullabaloo, which is the most expensive dorm, is cost comparable to living at NG. Guessing TAMU wants to get out of the student housing business. The private equity market seems to be taking up the slack.
Just like so many other universities, only fish will live on campus.
Also in Jan 2025, TAMU announced it will cap undergraduate enrollment for the "next 5 to 7 years".
jimbo457 said:
I remember when Northgate consisted of a variety of restaurants, a bike shop, a camera shop, Hollick's, ice cream store, a pool hall, a bookstore, clothing retail, and on and on...
Seems to me, if we are about protecting the character of NG, we'd be looking at ways to get back to that. It's just a bunch of bars now with a few eateries thrown in. If I'm being honest, I'm a little turned off by the appeal to emotion that is the idea of protecting the character or history of NG. The city has had a hand in where we are today because of the approval of all the licenses up there to open these establishments.
I'd also love to see the figures for how much revenue these NG businesses generate for the city compared to the cost to provide all the services they use.
Bob Yancy said:
The first four case studies are AI. The last one is yours truly.
PS3D said:Bob Yancy said:
The first four case studies are AI. The last one is yours truly.
No one's talking about tearing down Northgate as an urban renewal project, so I'm not sure what neighborhoods from 60+ years ago have to do with anything.
I'm not sure if you meant to reply to me or not, it certainly doesn't have to do with anything I was talking about.
jimbo457 said:
I remember when Northgate consisted of a variety of restaurants, a bike shop, a camera shop, Hollick's, ice cream store, a pool hall, a bookstore, clothing retail, and on and on...
Seems to me, if we are about protecting the character of NG, we'd be looking at ways to get back to that. It's just a bunch of bars now with a few eateries thrown in. If I'm being honest, I'm a little turned off by the appeal to emotion that is the idea of protecting the character or history of NG. The city has had a hand in where we are today because of the approval of all the licenses up there to open these establishments.
I'd also love to see the figures for how much revenue these NG businesses generate for the city compared to the cost to provide all the services they use.
EFR said:
If the type of places you mentioned thought NG was a profitable place to open they would buy/rent space when it comes available. They have not. What you are asking is for government to work against one set of local business owners in favor of another, which is a terrible idea.