***** Official 2026 World Cup Group D Thread *****

32,487 Views | 497 Replies | Last: 8 days ago by PatAg
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Almost posted the same thing last night. We need to score first and make them chase the game
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oops wrong group
agracer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

The Aussie bus continues to be tough to break through and #9's speed on counters- wow

yeah, Ream is going to be a liability back there for the US.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maybe, Australia was mostly playing long down the left side.
There are ways of providing cover for a player like Ream against tactics like that.
I think we looked magnitude sharper than Turkey as well offensively. Will be important to take the lead early against australia.

I could see this being a tight 1 goal game and I could also see us winning by 2-3 goals again
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What was the field like in Seattle
One Eyed Reveille
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

What was the field like in Seattle


Left leaning, smelled of sewage and weed.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

What was the field like in Seattle

I thought it looked to be the worst one so far, but still pretty solid.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has anyone even heard of this Mike Grella idiot?
JJxvi
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whats he doing? He was a youth player that some people knew because he was "playing" in Europe and therefore must be going to be good like 15+ years ago
Hardworking, Unselfish, Fearless
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YokelRidesAgain said:

oh no said:

Did they say why an indoor stadium in British Columbia still has hydration breaks?

FIFA likes money for commercial breaks with indoor and outdoor stadiums alike.

To standardize the game experience across all matches and avoid any controversy, they decided to have "hydration breaks" in every match regardless of conditions.
You mean TV ad breaks???
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JJxvi said:

Whats he doing? He was a youth player that some people knew because he was "playing" in Europe and therefore must be going to be good like 15+ years ago

He's made some comments about how Australia should be super easy wins for the entire group.
deadbq03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

agracer said:


yeah, Ream is going to be a liability back there for the US.
Maybe, Australia was mostly playing long down the left side.
There are ways of providing cover for a player like Ream against tactics like that.
I think we looked magnitude sharper than Turkey as well offensively. Will be important to take the lead early against australia.

I could see this being a tight 1 goal game and I could also see us winning by 2-3 goals again
Also to address the Ream concern… I was stunned when Ream won that foot race late (75' ish) against Paraguay. So I think he can do it when it happens infrequently. He got plenty of time that game to take it easy because we owned possession. Australia ought to be similar.

IMO it's against the big boys who play on the front foot where we'll see Ream get smoked because they'll be faster and running at him more frequently. I suspect for R16, rotating him (or maybe even benching him outright) will be mandatory.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Trusty is the other left foot dominant CB and I wonder if coaches think he's getting close to Ream with touch and decision making.

I think McKenzie is right-foot dominant but plays as a #5 LCB a lot for club. I don't trust him anywhere though.
deadbq03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think if we happen to get a 3 score lead, we have to use Trusty to save old man Ream's legs. Honestly I was stunned it didn't happen last game.

I don't mind seeing McKenzie out there, though I acknowledge the drop off is big. Miles Robinson is the CB I hope we never need to use.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just reported that Pulisic is day to day. Nothing ground breaking there.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wait for Friday is tough
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Wait for Friday is tough


Can confirm.
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PatAg said:

Wait for Friday is tough

My flight to Seattle is early tomorrow morning. Gonna be hard to sleep.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Just reported that Pulisic is day to day. Nothing ground breaking there.


But then again, aren't we all? - Dan Patrick (ESPN Anchor)
Furlock Bones
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sounding more like Pulisic won't play tomorrow.
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Furlock Bones said:

sounding more like Pulisic won't play tomorrow.

Based on what? What did you hear?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
so we got 1 game at full strength 11, and back to potentially Pulisic not being full speed.
Maximus_Meridius
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
One half. Pulisic came off at the half.
AustinScubaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Maximus_Meridius said:

One half. Pulisic came off at the half.

For once I think we have a squad that is good enough even without him. I am more worried about the defense than the attack.
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agree to an extent, but the drop off in possession and creating chances was a very noticeable step down in 1H with Pulisic vs 2H with Berhalter.
AustinScubaAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

agree to an extent, but the drop off in possession and creating chances was a very noticeable step down in 1H with Pulisic vs 2H with Berhalter.

That is because you put in Berhslter.
THE_CHOSEN_ONE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Poch just held a press conference, sounds like we won't know until tomorrow whether Pulisic will play or not
CrockerAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
We were supposed to get an update from Poch at his presser that started 20 minutes ago. Anyone see anything about Pulisic?
Thunder18
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why give anything away at this point?
oh no
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If CP is out, I think I'd prefer to go 4-4-2 and add Pepi to the lineup along side Flo, rather than same formation and add Berhalter
carl spacklers hat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
oh no said:

If CP is out, I think I'd prefer to go 4-4-2 and add Pepi to the lineup along side Flo, rather than same formation and add Berhalter

Any formation that leaves Berhalter on the bench would be the right choice.
People think I'm an idiot or something, because all I do is cut lawns for a living.
wangus12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Group D Standings:
-----------------------------Pld---W---D---L---GD----Pts
United States----------1---1---0---0___+3----3
Australia-----------------1---1---0---0___+2----3
Turkey---------------------1---0---0---1___-2----0
Paraguay-----------------1---0---0---1___-3----0

Match Day 1 Results:
United States 4 : Paraguay 1
Australia 2 : Turkey 0


Friday, June 19th

United States of America vs. Australia
2:00 PM CT
Lumen Field, Seattle, WA
TV: Fox, Telemundo


Turkey vs. Paraguay
10:00 PM CT
Levi's Stadium, San Francisco,CA
TV: FS1, Telemundo

deadbq03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oh no said:

If CP is out, I think I'd prefer to go 4-4-2 and add Pepi to the lineup along side Flo, rather than same formation and add Berhalter
I like the idea of two up top, too - but I'd like to think the alternative to that idea has gotta be to bring on an attacking mid or winger (Gio, Aaronson, Weah), not Berhalter.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.