Just to clarify a few things because a lot of assumptions are being made.
Yes, Travis played 2 years at JUCO, 2 years at Texas A&M, and 1 year at DII after being denied a waiver by the NCAA. But this isn't about "endless eligibility." It's about fairness and consistency. Athletes in nearly identical situations, same number of seasons, same JUCO path, same COVID impact, have received a sixth year. Travis didn't, simply because his waiver came before the NCAA issued a blanket policy adjustment. That's not due process, that's bad timing.
We're not asking anyone to take on a full-blown lawsuit for free. We're asking for legal guidance on how to appeal, petition for reconsideration, or explore other administrative and advocacy-based options through the NCAA. We want clarity, not a courtroom battle.
From a legal perspective, when rules are applied inconsistently, especially in situations with identical circumstances, it raises legitimate concerns about disparate treatment and arbitrary enforcement. When the NCAA creates policies and then applies them retroactively for some and not others, it undermines trust in the system. Add in the economic harm from missed NIL opportunities and draft exposure, and it's even more significant. That's what we're trying to address, not with emotion, but with facts.
Also, let's talk about the value of a sixth-year senior. In today's game, especially with the chaos of the transfer portal, guys like Travis are crucial. They bring leadership, maturity, and stability to a team. Travis has played on the biggest stage in college baseball. He knows what it takes to win and what it means to represent Texas A&M. Having him back next year would strengthen the locker room, support the younger guys, and bring experience most teams are desperate to have.
It's also ironic that some are quick to criticize the current performance of the team but then want to dismiss players like Travis who are trying to return and help lead the charge toward a national championship and play for a coach that he believes in. You can't demand excellence and then reject the players (or coach) who are willing to stay and fight for it.
If this fight helps future athletes navigate these gray areas and brings clarity to inconsistent policies, then it's worth every bit of the effort. Travis isn't asking for special treatment, he's asking for equal treatment. That's not entitlement. That's accountability and advocacy for athletes who deserve a fair system.
The purpose of my post was simply to ask the Aggie community if anyone knew someone who could help. I believe I've accomplished that, and I'll wait to see if someone reaches out directly. Thank you to those who understand what we're standing for. Gig 'em.
&ct=g 
