Very okay. Not near as good as Superman.
TCTTS said:
It never made sense to me why Disney didn't save FF for November. Just completely baffling, especially considering they only had a year to shoot it and do VFX, which is insane for a movie of this scale.
Weirdly, though, that may be a blessing for the superhero genre in the long run, re: superhero fatigue, seeing as the next superhero movie now isn't until June 26, 2026 with Supergirl. In the modern age, have we ever gone 11 months without a superhero movie?
Well somehow I forgot about TDKR.Bruce Almighty said:Cinco Ranch Aggie said:
The Avengers to Iron Man 3 was a year.
10 months. TDKR came out 2 months after Avengers.
Cliff.Booth said:
It probably hurt that this movie came out at the peak of social media becoming aware that Pedro Pascal is a weirdo. Hollywood has tried so hard the last few years trying to shoehorn him in as THE guy. Maybe they'll move on to someone more deserving.
bobinator said:
I did think his voice was weird in parts of this movie. I dunno if it's because in most things he's kind of going for a gruff lower pitched thing but the first time he talked in this movie I thought of the SNL skit he's in where he wakes up with the weird voice.
Cliff.Booth said:
Doesn't seem like a "small minority" kind of thing. My favorite clip was where he laid his hands on Willem Dafoe's wife and he looked like he wanted to punch him. Something is definitely off about that guy, but I guess we can agree to disagree on that.
Sapper Redux said:bobinator said:
I did think his voice was weird in parts of this movie. I dunno if it's because in most things he's kind of going for a gruff lower pitched thing but the first time he talked in this movie I thought of the SNL skit he's in where he wakes up with the weird voice.
I thought he was going for a nerdier voice for Reed. It sounded off in a couple scenes.
dave94 said:
I really enjoyed both movies. I will definitely see them both again in the theater, but I think F4 has me wanting to rewatch more.
AustinAg2K said:
Finally got around to seeing this, and felt like it was pretty average for a Marvel movie. I knew going in that it was going to be superhero vs alien, but I guess I was still hoping for a better done villain. I really prefer Earth based super villains. Give them some sort of cosmic ray or radioactive bite, so they can compete, but random alien is kind of boring for me.
I haven't read the thread yet, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who was distracted by the creepy baby. Also, I thought it was kind of lazy of the writers to not explain why Galactus wanted the baby. They should have just named him, "McGuffin."
Sex Panther said:AustinAg2K said:
Finally got around to seeing this, and felt like it was pretty average for a Marvel movie. I knew going in that it was going to be superhero vs alien, but I guess I was still hoping for a better done villain. I really prefer Earth based super villains. Give them some sort of cosmic ray or radioactive bite, so they can compete, but random alien is kind of boring for me.
I haven't read the thread yet, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who was distracted by the creepy baby. Also, I thought it was kind of lazy of the writers to not explain why Galactus wanted the baby. They should have just named him, "McGuffin."
The baby is a McGuffin, but they did explain why he wants him. Pretty thoroughly.
I don't read the comics but I do know that Reed and Sue's kid (Franklin) is a big deal and extremely powerful. Galactus can see this and he tells them he wants the kid because he can take over his role so he can finally rest.
And I get what you're saying but Galactus isn't a random alien. He's one of the biggest bads in comics and a primary foe of the F4
Sex Panther said:AustinAg2K said:
Finally got around to seeing this, and felt like it was pretty average for a Marvel movie. I knew going in that it was going to be superhero vs alien, but I guess I was still hoping for a better done villain. I really prefer Earth based super villains. Give them some sort of cosmic ray or radioactive bite, so they can compete, but random alien is kind of boring for me.
I haven't read the thread yet, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who was distracted by the creepy baby. Also, I thought it was kind of lazy of the writers to not explain why Galactus wanted the baby. They should have just named him, "McGuffin."
The baby is a McGuffin, but they did explain why he wants him. Pretty thoroughly.
I don't read the comics but I do know that Reed and Sue's kid (Franklin) is a big deal and extremely powerful. Galactus can see this and he tells them he wants the kid because he can take over his role so he can finally rest.
And I get what you're saying but Galactus isn't a random alien. He's one of the biggest bads in comics and a primary foe of the F4
AustinAg2K said:Sex Panther said:AustinAg2K said:
Finally got around to seeing this, and felt like it was pretty average for a Marvel movie. I knew going in that it was going to be superhero vs alien, but I guess I was still hoping for a better done villain. I really prefer Earth based super villains. Give them some sort of cosmic ray or radioactive bite, so they can compete, but random alien is kind of boring for me.
I haven't read the thread yet, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who was distracted by the creepy baby. Also, I thought it was kind of lazy of the writers to not explain why Galactus wanted the baby. They should have just named him, "McGuffin."
The baby is a McGuffin, but they did explain why he wants him. Pretty thoroughly.
I don't read the comics but I do know that Reed and Sue's kid (Franklin) is a big deal and extremely powerful. Galactus can see this and he tells them he wants the kid because he can take over his role so he can finally rest.
And I get what you're saying but Galactus isn't a random alien. He's one of the biggest bads in comics and a primary foe of the F4
All I heard them say was that Galactus is afraid the baby is going to over take Galactus, but no explanation as to why. No explanation as to what the Baby's powers are, other than it can heal people. I don't get how that has anything to do with Galactus. Is he going to heal the planets back together after Galactus eats them?
Also, I have heard of Galactus, and I know he eats planets, but I have no idea of why. Are the planets becoming too powerful? Are they doing harm to the universe? Is it just because Silver Surfer doesn't like the way they look? Is he clearing the way for a new interstellar super highway? Other than knowing he's a big bad guy, I don't know anything else about him.
Quote:
But there's nothing like that here. They're each already comfortable with their powers, they're each doing their jobs for the right reasons, they're already a tight-knit family, etc. Seeing as "family" seems to be the theme of the movie, though, that's what I would have honed in on to develop. You can still skip the origin story, by at the beginning of the movie have them growing apart, leading their own lives, etc. Johnny is loving/getting caught up in the celebrity of it all, Ben is having a hard time adjusting/fitting in, Sue and Richard are having trouble conceiving, etc. Whatever their individual issues are, they're struggling to "be a family." But then here comes Galactus and now they suddenly have to learn to come together as a family again, embrace who they are, etc. Something along those lines.
As good as the first half is, it's an ideal, not a struggle, in terms of character. And I think that's one of the reasons why the second half dips significantly for me... it exposes that nothing particularly interesting was set up in the first half in terms character arcs, and you soon realize there's no where interesting for their arcs to go.
Gaius Rufus said:
This was one of the most boring movies I have seen. The characters were smart when the plot needed them to be, then dumb when the plot needed them to be. Also, the technology made no sense. I get the retro vibes, but they are still using tape recorders for data storage while inventing matter transportation devices?
Also, the humor was a complete miss for me, especially at the end. They just saved the world from the first intergalactic threat they've ever faced, get an alert about danger, then spend the next 10 minutes trying to put a baby seat on a car. Just terrible.
I'm not even comparing it to Superman, I'm just comparing it to the average action movie. It was bad
Only redeeming thing for me was the retro motif. Most of that was pretty cool. The huge TV's on shillings started out neat, but got a little much when they showed galactic romping through New York.
Oh, yeah, I almost forget. The plan to stop the big bad guy was to trick him into stepping into a trap? And what was with the super long count down sequences throughout the entire movie? Then the getting to 0.88 speed of light to get home? Maybe I missed the explanation because I fell asleep, but if they used FTL to get from point A to point B, then to Point C, wouldn't travelling back to Point A at near the speed of light cause massive relativity problems?
Again, completely fine with suspending disbelief, but if the premise of the movie is a super intelligent family saves the world using science, you should probably be consistent with the science you use.