*** ONE BATTLE AFTER ANOTHER *** (Leonardo DiCaprio, dir. Paul Thomas Anderson)

14,513 Views | 315 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by Richleau12
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Notice how I didn't say "you" once in that paragraph. I purposefully phrased it as referring to the dozen-or-so others who gleefully engage in that crap.

While I do think you're way too politically minded when it comes to movies/TV, and I see you complaining about that stuff more often than not, I do admit that you're not as hateful/fervent/giddy about it all as the worst here.

When it comes to this particular movie, I think you're being extremely unfair to the point of gaslighting, but by and large, outside of the ways in which you mock me and then call me out for mocking others, I don't put you in the camp I named.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I did mock your kind of condescending tone toward me/others for having a different interpretation, but I'm sorry if I said anything that gave the impression I am hateful toward you. I hate how Hollywood fans the flames, and sometimes when you seem to excuse or defend it, I am guilty of taking out that emotion on you, but you're a fellow Ag and good dude in real life. Absolutely no hate.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah it was kind of like one of those trailers that tried to make the stars sell the movie and then the huge PAUL THOMAS ANDERSON card at the end, but there was no "Wow this looks great" It was like "What the hell is this?", especially with the scene at the end with BDT and DiCaprio "THANK YOU SENSEI"....wat?

Could have been a heist type movie or something. Very disjoint.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cliff.Booth said:

I did mock your kind of condescending tone toward me/others for having a different interpretation, but I'm sorry if I said anything that gave the impression I am hateful toward you. I hate how Hollywood fans the flames, and sometimes when you seem to excuse or defend it, I am guilty of taking out that emotion on you, but you're a fellow Ag and good dude in real life. Absolutely no hate.


I genuinely appreciate that. I mean it.

And I apologize for being hateful toward you as well.

Please just know this...

I can't stand aspects of Hollywood just as much as the rest of you. There are no doubt plenty of annoying liberals saying plenty of annoying things and making plenty of annoying content. Never mind all of the other insider-baseball Hollywood bull**** I have to deal with on a daily basis.

What I'm often defending here, on this board, is merely when I feel that the hate is either all-consuming, overblown, or coming from a place of be uninformed, based on my experience in this industry and what I know to be true from the "inside."

It's not a "liberal defending Hollywood from conservatives" situation. Rather, I'm someone who walks the line, both literally and politically, between Hollywood and Texas (which I visit at least every other month on average, while being in constant communication with friends and family there), and am simply trying to say, "As someone who can relate to you and where you're coming from, I think you're blowing this out of proportion and that it's not as bad you're making it out to be." That's where my arguments and push-backs are often coming from.

To that end, in the case of this movie, I'm simply trying to say that PTA deserves more credit than some of you are giving him. Yes, this movie is "woke" as hell and I'm not at all denying that. But for a "woke" movie, he's at least saying, "Violence isn't the answer. Family is." Which I feel is something we can all get behind, despite our differences. That's it and that's all. You can hate the portrayal of the right/bad guys, and you can hate the other "woke" aspects as well. I'm just trying to make the point that, overall, it's not as extreme as some of you might think.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apology accepted,I appreciate you saying that.

I think we're gonna have to agree to disagree on some of this stuff. I think some things in this movie CAN be seen the way you've presented it, but I am seriously worried that it WILL be seen the way I have presented it.

Picture a heavy metal concert going on. A trained musician in the crowd is standing there, noticing things about the time signature and the key the song is in, its tempo, interesting chord progression and strumming patterns, looking at their gear setup and making observations about the effects they're using, etc......while someone else with no background in music is there just feeling the aggressive tone of the song and wanting to go jump in the mosh pit and thrash around. You're the "trained musician" and you can't turn off that part of your perception of movies because it's what you do. I fear that movies that depict urban guerilla tactics as resistance to authority and also depict right of center people as soulless fascists are a ticking time bomb fueling aggression in young, mentally unwell, gullible people. I wish this movie had treated some things differently.
Capybara
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good, solid 4/5 movie, imo. One of the few good things to "come out of Hollywood" since Covid began. Good on PTA, the cast & crew, etc.
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

If they're anything like you, of course they won't think that. Luckily, TexAgs is a notoriously extreme but obscure corner of the internet, and thankfully the many conservatives I have in my life aren't politically obsessed zealots like the lot here.

Except that it's not.

Donald Trump did in fact win the electoral and popular vote. We are not the extreme. You have to come back to reality at some point and deal with it.

Republicans hold a slight majority in the House and Senate and a solid majority in the states.

We are not the extreme. You have to at some point accept reality.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Please read the actual words that I wrote. Otherwise, you're putting words in my mouth, same as you guys always do.

I didn't say "Republicans are extreme" or "Republicans aren't the majority."

Rather, clearly, my point was that F16 is a haven for the most extreme Republicans, i.e. a particular brand of Republican. The kind who obsessively sees the world through a political lens, freaks the **** out over "woke" entertainment, and lives to ***** and moan about liberals on the internet as a way to vent/virtue signal/define themselves by who they hate.

Obviously, not every Republican on TexAgs is zealot in that regard. Not even close. But the argument posed to me was essentially that all Republicans will think this movie is glorifying/romanticizing violent revolutionaries, and in response I was merely saying that not every Republican is obsessed with hating on this kind of stuff as much this ones who make a habit it of doing so every day on TexAgs.

It was a very simple argument that you somehow managed to misconstrue.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Guys... come on.

Be real.

To those who know it, F16 is widely considered one of the most far-right eco chambers on the internet. It's also mocked frequently on the rest of this site, and outside of this site on social media, reddit, in everyday conversation, etc, all while having to be moderated like nothing else due to all the insane **** posted there.

Y'all can keep telling yourselves that you're just Averaged Joe concerned citizens, but this place is undeniably a harbor for far-right, politically-obsessed keyboard warriors who get off on raging on the internet, the likes of which I have never met in the real world. And I come from a very conservative family with countless conservative friends back home.

Of all the things being denied in this thread, this might take the cake.

Yes, a portion of the left absolutely deserves to be mocked, shouted down, etc, and are just as bad in their own right as some of the folks here. But at least have just an ounce of self-awareness and recognize that the very act of passionately arguing politics on the internet puts you in the "extreme" category by default. And I'm just as guilty for engaging with you! But at least I can cop to it.

You know that Trump won in a landslide, right?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just... please learn to read. See above. Seriously, y'all, this is insane.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Just... please learn to read. See above. Seriously, y'all, this is insane.

I look forward to your next nonsensical post. I read and dismissed your nonsense
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I look forward to you passing the 5th grade.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I look forward to you passing the 5th grade.

Keep pumping out crap films that only 30% of the country supports, at huge costs. Seems like a good business model. 5th graders understand that isn't a great idea. They also understand how box office profits get divided
FancyKetchup14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:

TCTTS said:

I look forward to you passing the 5th grade.

Keep pumping out crap films that only 30% of the country supports, at huge costs. Seems like a good business model. 5th graders understand that isn't a great idea. They also understand how box office profits get divided


Profits don't seem to matter. Ideology and propaganda is apparently the only way for folks of his ilk. I find it hilarious that in one breath he calls f16 a far right (dog whistle) echo chamber while also living in LA and working in Hollywood which is a far left echo chamber. But I guess the latter is ok and the former are a bunch of cooks to this hypocrite. The dude posts here like it's his job because it is. Now that's some sad ***** Hey TC, is antifa a terrorist org?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Good Lord, could you sound like any more of a joke/cliche of exactly who I've been describing?

Also, I never said that LA isn't a far-left echo chamber (though you might be shocked to hear that we have the same internet/news/entertainment you do, and never-mind it being one of the biggest cultural melting pots in the world). The key difference is I'm here, on this board, willingly engaging with the right, day after day after day. I also read F16 frequently, watch Fox News not infrequently, and am back in Texas all the damn time. In other words, your dumb little "bubble" nonsense is easily popped.

As for Antifa, sure? I'm not the "lib" you think I am, meaning I have no problem seeing their violence treated as such.

Any more stupid insults/questions?
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Good Lord, could you sound like any more of a joke/cliche of exactly who I've been describing?

Also, I never said that LA isn't a far-left echo chamber (though you might be shocked to hear that we have the same internet/news/entertainment you do, and never-mind it being one of the biggest cultural melting pots in the world). The key difference is I'm here, on this board, willingly engaging with the right, day after day after day. I also read F16 frequently, watch Fox News not infrequently, and am back in Texas all the damn time. In other words, your dumb little "bubble" nonsense is easily popped.

As for Antifa, sure? I'm not the "lib" you think I am, meaning I have no problem seeing their violence treated as such.

Any more stupid insults/questions?


You are a gigantic lib, that much is obvious. You are so much of a lib you actually thought that some conservatives might be able to take something positive out of the movie.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm sorry, but you're just not very good at this. If anything, the more you respond, the more disappointed you make me that I ever engaged with you in the first place. Your retorts could not fall any flatter, you haven't said a single smart/interesting thing yet, and you in fact come across as quite the opposite. You'll inevitably respond to the post with something you think is clever or insulting, but I assure you it won't be.
Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Good Lord, could you sound like any more of a joke/cliche of exactly who I've been describing?

Also, I never said that LA isn't a far-left echo chamber (though you might be shocked to hear that we have the same internet/news/entertainment you do, and never-mind it being one of the biggest cultural melting pots in the world). The key difference is I'm here, on this board, willingly engaging with the right, day after day after day. I also read F16 frequently, watch Fox News not infrequently, and am back in Texas all the damn time. In other words, your dumb little "bubble" nonsense is easily popped.

As for Antifa, sure? I'm not the "lib" you think I am, meaning I have no problem seeing their violence treated as such.

Any more stupid insults/questions?


You make it sound like you need a badge of honor for engaging in your fellow man. How precious. What bravery. It's 5am and you're posting. Did you get a notification? Did it wake you from your slumber to fulfill your quota? This really must be a job for you. Why do you think LA is a far left echo chamber? Why do they continue to stub their toe and not appeal to the majority of Americans? Why do they insert leftist ideology when they know it will negatively impact story and returns? It sounds more like a crusade. Fanciful movies like this who paint antifa, as you admit is a terrorist organization, as heroes is peak leftist Hollywood.

Gone are the days when communists and socialists were black balled. Now they are lauded. So, you think antifa is a terrorist organization. What do you think about communism and socialism?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh, so you *do* have more stupid questions.

First of all, do you hear yourself?

Earlier I described the most fervent, prototypical F16 poster, and now you show up, almost on cue, perfectly embodying every cliche as if conjured directly from that description itself.

Never mind the fact that I've addressed damn near every hate/coke-fueled question of yours in this thread already, save for "What do you think about communism and socialism?"

Hahaha what?

Um, they're bad?

I can't stand them and have never once remotely supported either one.

Now, I'm sure that won't be good enough for you, but it's going to have to suffice, because we're done here.
Quo Vadis?
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

I'm sorry, but you're just not very good at this. If anything, the more you respond, the more disappointed you make me that I ever engaged with you in the first place. Your retorts could not fall any flatter, you haven't said a single smart/interesting thing yet, and you in fact come across as quite the opposite. You'll inevitably respond to the post with something you think is clever or insulting, but I assure you it won't be.


I would imagine disappointment is a large part of your existence so it should be no large disturbance to your daily life.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Better! Good job.
FancyKetchup14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Damn shame that a thread about a pretty good movie has become littered with lunatics, haters, and punk trash.
LCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not reading this entire thread. So, is the movie any good?
FancyKetchup14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It isn't my favorite PTA film but I really enjoyed it. It's certainly worth the price of admission and I recommend seeing it on the big screen. I got to see it in 70mm format and in the age of digital film making, it was actually really refreshing to see the small imperfections in the film stock briefly flashing on the screen. It reminded me A) how beautiful film stock really looks when it is done right and B) PTA is a freaking craftsman. It looks great and some of the shots/sequences were incredible.
LCE
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thanks.
Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

Oh, so you *do* have more stupid questions.

First of all, do you hear yourself?

Earlier I described the most fervent, prototypical F16 poster, and now you show up, almost on cue, perfectly embodying every cliche as if conjured directly from that description itself.

Never mind the fact that I've addressed damn near every hate/coke-fueled question of yours in this thread already, save for "What do you think about communism and socialism?"

Hahaha what?

Um, they're bad?

I can't stand them and have never once remotely supported either one.

Now, I'm sure that won't be good enough for you, but it's going to have to suffice, because we're done here.


Are you ok?
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FancyKetchup14 said:

Damn shame that a thread about a pretty good movie has become littered with lunatics, haters, and punk trash.



I laughed.
Head Ninja In Charge
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FancyKetchup14 said:

It isn't my favorite PTA film but I really enjoyed it. It's certainly worth the price of admission and I recommend seeing it on the big screen. I got to see it in 70mm format and in the age of digital film making, it was actually really refreshing to see the small imperfections in the film stock briefly flashing on the screen. It reminded me A) how beautiful film stock really looks when it is done right and B) PTA is a freaking craftsman. It looks great and some of the shots/sequences were incredible.

A lot has been made about the end chase scene, deservingly so. My favorite part though was that chunk right in the middle where Benicio del Toro's character kicks things into gear with Jonny Greenwood percussion backing up the entire scene. Equal parts suspense, humor, and WTF. Good moviemaking right there.
Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I find it interesting that Benicio went from Sicario where he's glorified in fighting against human trafficking to this movie where he's glorified as a human trafficker. What a turn!
veryfuller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
AG
I saw this last night and I really liked it. Its only grown on me more as time has gone by, tbh. It feels like a mashup of Coen brothers and Tarantino, in all the best ways. And it MOVES. It does not feel nearly as long as the runtime is. The pacing is perfect and propulsive. PTA has never been my cup of tea, so this is easily my favorite of his movies, and one of the best of the year so far, to me.

I do have thoughts on the politics, since that has been discussed ad nauseam. I haven't read everyone's back in forth in detail, but I do think I have some newish thoughts to add to the conversation.

1) I understand why in this moment the political violence in the movie is causing a stir. When political controversy erupts, I tend to try to think, "what if this was happening in a mirror?" to better gauge how I feel about the scenario. So like, if there was recent spate of right wing political violence, and a movie comes out about say....a right wing anti-abortion terror group who bombs abortion clinics. And most of the characters of that group are portrayed as a well-meaning messes, and the left wing nuts against them are all super cartoon versions of themselves. This obviously breaks down a bit because of the different angles at play, but just a thought experiment. I think I am right when I assume that the media as a whole would be reacting to the movie in a totally different way, even if the story-telling and filmmaking was at the same level. I think thats what some posters here are frustrated by.

A recent example of this is the movie Eddington. That movie got panned by both sides of the spectrum because it was fair (IMHO) to all it's characters and made fun of both extremes (effectively, IMO). Its actually a good companion piece to OBAA in style/tone/content. Critics' main beef was its politics.

Civil War had a similar issue. Not specific enough in its politics, so not rated as highly. Also the conversation around violence in that movie was louder because of that.

BUT....

2) I don't really have a lot of sympathy for the violence in movies discussion. It feels convenient to complain about violence in movies when it goes against whatever political/religious/ideological movement you ascribe to, but to ignore it when it doesn't do that. There is a ton of violence in our movie culture, and a ton of sympathy, empathy, heroic motives given to those who commit said violence. We've got whole TV shows dedicated to fleshing out the character of serial murderers, we've got whole franchises of men just mowing down people for our entertainment. There are movies that use religion as a reason to murder, sympathetically. It runs the spectrum. Now you don't have to LIKE any of those movies. And you don't have to watch them. But I'd bet, some of you complaining about this movie being used to justify violence, have some movies on your favorite movie lists that have violent people doing things for "reasons" that others would think abhorrent, but they don't bother you, they entertain you, so its fine.

Example: I've never like The Boondock Saints, which was a seminal film of my generation, because they killed people because God told them to. I just kept coming back to the fact that the terrorists we were fighting all over the world were doing the same thing and couldn't stomach it. Most of my friends were annoyed with my take, but I just couldn't get passed it.

But like, I love The Departed and feel really good when Mark Whalberg gets his revenge in the end. Felt like justice.

/rant

Richleau12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fair points indeed. Yes it has nothing to do with violence in film and everything to do with its message. This film was a Goebbles level of propaganda inspired by an equally incendiary book. Couple that with recent riots, murders, insurrections across the nation and world, then yes, folks rightly so should pushback against this type of rhetoric and, in particular, glorification of human trafficking and terrorism. The comparisons to Star Wars further devolves these cretins into a delusional state whereby they may take up arms and continue the struggle against perceived evil. It's a fabrication, a play, and a provocation by unseen actual evil forces.

The film should be shunned and yet, unsurprisingly, will be lauded at the Oscars. Goebbles would be so proud.

Anyone remember The Hunt? These types of power fantasies using violence as a means to destroy your political enemies is not something to be lauded, ever.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Quote:

First
All I can say is I've read these boards for years and rarely post because I fear your reaction if you disagree. If you go read your responses in the past you tend to attack the person and not the message. I've seen enough instances of your use of extreme adjectives that led itself to being abusive language towards someone you don't agree with

like calling responding peoples' thoughts insane for example or you attack them in some way for a opposite belief this is meant to be a constructive criticism to your industry but you tend to respond aggressively so please read it that way and read this response this way too if I might ask


Except you're leaving out one key factor in all if this, which is that these people - the ones I disagree with, whom I "attack," use "extreme adjectives" and "abusive language" toward, etc - aren't just random people whom I go around bullying for sport. Rather, these people, 95% of the time, are the same 10-20 posters who live to HATE Hollywood/liberals on this board. Not just people for whom left-leaning media is starting to "take a toll," but rather people who express a seething, mocking hatred for Hollywood, and often for half of the country as well, in the exact same ways you claim Hollywood does for the right.

Otherwise, I'm sorry, but I simply don't do the things you listed with the people here who aren't aggressively/incessantly political, and I'm very conscious of that. Will Spilner and I get into it over the Star Wars prequels or whatever? Sure. Will I passionately argue for a movie I may have either liked more (or less) than others? Absolutely. But stuff like that is mostly all in good fun. Rather, most of the time I go out of my way to acknowledge and breed positivity here, whether it's responding supportively to great discussion/theories, or hyping as much content as I possibly can (in genuine fashion). If you can't see the positively I try to bring in those regards, which far outweighs my vitriol, I don't know what to tell you.

The truth is, there is a distinct F16 bleed-over on this board who HATES me, HATES my colleagues, and HATES my profession, who uses thread after thread here to constantly remind me of their hatred. And if it's not hatred, it's predominantly endless complaining about "woke" when, more often than not the amount of complaining far outweighs whatever "woke" transgression has occurred. Further, it finally dawned on me that for as much as these people incessantly complain, and ruin thread after thread with their complaints… deep down they enjoy it. They enjoy the venting, the rage, and the superiority complex it gives them, which only fuels the fire and makes this place more and more miserable/depressing at times. Which, in return, on fuels me to respond.

I mean, the very fact that you're not even acknowledging that very real phenomenon on this board, and not also lecturing the people in this thread opposite me for holding to their views just as stubbornly as I'm holding to mine, kind of proves my point. Have they been quite as vocal as me in this thread? No. But they're being just as one-sided, and in the past, in other threads, have been just as mocking, just as "abusive," and "attack" me all the damn time.

All of that to say, I've been working in this industry for over 22 years. I've put in my 10,000 hours and so much more. I know what I'm talking about, and I'm sorry, but I don't have to be humble about that simply because you want me to be.

Yes, art is subjective. But the science of screenwriting, story structure, theme, etc isn't nearly as subjective as many would like to think. It's a highly technical endeavor, with all kinds of "rules" and nuance and once you learn to "see the Matrix" in that regard, after reading dozens of screenwriting books, thousands of screenplays, giving endless amounts of notes in professional development settings, and of course seeing hundreds more movies on top of all of that, you become an expert on the subject. To that end, this is my profession and I'm very good at it.

Also, I literally work with the people who make a number of the movies/shows we discuss on this board. I'm around them constantly, on Zooms with them, on emails with them, etc. In other words, I know how these people think, how they work, and often what they're trying to say/accomplish through their work. I'm not just some angry slapdick on the internet. For instance, last week, literally the day One Battle After Another hit theaters, I was on a Zoom with the person who runs DiCaprio's production company, trying to crack a new direction for a character in a pilot we're all making together. And for what it's worth, the show we're working on takes place in Texas, doesn't paint Texans/the right as backwards or wrong in any way, features a scene in a positive light in which a Christian prays, etc, and this is something that DiCaprio's name is on. So this idea that everyone out here - especially the guy starring in the movie this thread is discussing - hates you and your politics and your religion is, as always, an exaggeration. Does Hollywood lean left? Absolutely. But this idea that all Hollywood does is **** all over half the country simply isn't true.

This is all to say that it can be maddening at times when these ultra-conservative, politically-obsessed types, thousands of miles away, insist, in the most bad faith ways possible, that they know better or that they know what the intent of any given filmmaker is and I don't. Can you not see how that's frustrating? And how, when their attacks on me are laced with just as much vitriol and mocking, I'm the only one who gets called out, for simply responding to them?

As to everything else you said, I'm sorry, but I just don't have the energy to go over all of that stuff again for the thousandth time. You used multiple sweeping generalizations, put words in my mouth, ignored much of what I've said in this thread (again, I just can't with the lack of nuance anymore), and are clearly on the right yourself, in a way that's of course going to bias you to many of the arguments I make and the ways in which I conduct myself toward the more aggressive right-wingers on this board.

As always, you can choose with your wallet not to endorse Hollywood's messaging - or - in this day and age, you can easily go make the content yourself that you so desire. YouTube has FAR more reach than Hollywood does now anyway. Hollywood isn't the gatekeeper it once was, nor does it hold the level of influence you're claiming. Twenty years ago? Sure. But not anymore.

All of that said, if it's any consolation, the things I, personally, am trying to make don't lean liberal in the ways you describe and, as I said above, I'm making an effort to paint the right/Texans in a positive light (we're working on multiple Texas-set stories). I'm trying to do things different in that regard, but whether I succeed is another matter. That said… the right isn't always right, and Christians aren't always good. So when I feel like either need to be called out, whether in a movie we discuss on this board, in my work, or on this board, I'm not going to refrain from doing so.

The bully is now the victim.
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I'm sorry, but you're just not very good at this. If anything, the more you respond, the more disappointed you make me that I ever engaged with you in the first place. Your retorts could not fall any flatter, you haven't said a single smart/interesting thing yet, and you in fact come across as quite the opposite. You'll inevitably respond to the post with something you think is clever or insulting, but I assure you it won't be.

TC is disappointed in you...
WestAustinAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:



Y'all can keep telling yourselves that you're just Averaged Joe concerned citizens, but this place is undeniably a harbor for far-right, politically-obsessed keyboard warriors who get off on raging on the internet, the likes of which I have never met in the real world. And I come from a very conservative family with countless conservative friends back home.




Y'all can keep telling yourselves that you're just an average everyday American storyteller, but this place is undeniably a harbor for far-left, politically-obsessed keyboard warriors who get off on raging on the internet, the likes of which I have never met in the real world. And I come from a very radical family with countless leftist friends back home.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.