waitwhat? said:
Excuse my ignorance here, but what's the point of discussing if Epstein was an "intel asset" or not? Shouldn't the main question still simply be, who was on his client list?
I don't see why I should care if he was an "intel asset" or not. I'm only interested in who in power engaged in these acts with him, exposing them, and prosecuting them.
If a foreign or domestic intel agency was running a honeypot/child sex trafficking ring to blackmail powerful people, I'd like to know.
Very strange take