Dorm 15 said:
flown-the-coop said:
Dorm 15 said:
I only became deeply interested in the Epstein case because of the New Mexico connection. From reading the posts on this thread it appears that the individuals who down play the significance of failure to reveal all the files are those that are President Trump's strongest supporters. For the record, I do not believe there is any evidence that would incriminate President Trump. My reading of this topic,I cannot recall anyone who has suggested such. The Nassar, Swalwell, and Sandusky disgusting episodes have nothing to do with releasing the Epstein Files. I am just amazed that anyone would be OK or trying to justify the files not being released.
The files have been released. What the hell are you rambling about?
https://www.kvue.com/video/news/politics/national-politics/department-of-justice-epstein-files/269-d92b6bfd-0bc1-48f8-97f3-38cb42fb834a
Instead of demeaning language why not try responding with an explanation.
It's been covered exhaustively in the media and this very thread.
An article from 90 days ago saying all documents have been released is not exactly an update.
If you are talking about the redactions and exclusions in the Massie-Khana law, those are not being hidden. They were reviewed and determined to not be responsive to the law OR in certain cases were redacted and withheld.
Pretty sure you know this and have known this.
To pretend that someone just proclaimed interest in this area because of tie to New Mexico then to mislead by saying Trump and his DOJ are not complying nor releasing,,, that falls under rumor, unconfirmed or false information in my book.
But you do you. My language was not demeaning, it reflects frustration of some trying to mislead in order to keep the story fresh.
If you want a more plausible summation of what happened, read the interview with Dersh that was just posted.
But I am not being a big meanie, just a bit frustrated that there are some who respond old fact as new.