Logos Stick said:
I'm sure the Dem "machine" will fund his legal fees. They all need to be indicted. Nothing may come from it, but it needs to happen.
Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard this month declassified material that she claimed proved a "treasonous conspiracy" by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory.
As evidence, Gabbard cited newly declassified emails from Obama officials and a five-year-old classified House report in hopes of undermining the intelligence community's conclusion that Russian Presid
...
Those investigations either concluded or accepted the conclusion that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material.
The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election.
...
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified material that she claimed proved a "treasonous conspiracy" by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory.(Source: POOL via CNN)
The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up:
Russian election interference
CLAIM: "The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election." Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday.
The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems.
coupland boy said:
I dont expect real accountability here (criminal prosecution - prison) but I hope for ttransparency and acknowledgement.
will25u said:CNN Nat Security Analyst Beth Sanner accuses Trump admin of by aiding Russia by disclosing intel docs:
— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) July 23, 2025
“By bringing this up again, the Trump administration is doing the work of our adversary, Russia."
Of course. pic.twitter.com/sUsPfH8ueq
🚨This is a critically important piece of tape from my interview just moments ago with DNI Tulsi Gabbard where she FIRES BACK at her critics. They claim her allegations contradict findings in the 2019 Mueller Report and the 2020 Senate Intelligence Committee report.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 24, 2025
WATCH. pic.twitter.com/ZaQE6C7cpl
RUSSIAGATE: The Russians believed Clinton would be elected in 2016 and as a result began compiling intel that could be used to blackmail Hillary Clinton. According to the House Intel Committee Report, Russian Intelligence had evidence of 'secret meetings' between State Department… pic.twitter.com/GEj19aWtHl
— @amuse (@amuse) July 24, 2025
Ellis Wyatt said:
DEBOONKED!
This topic is not even on the main page of KWTX's/KBTX's website, you have to go to the national news page, but this is how the AP is choosing to report. It is not a fact-based report, it is their opinion. Not surprisingly, it is nothing more than leftist talking points. And to them, proof would have to be Hussein prosecuted and convicted. Nothing else will do for them.
Such different treatment from how the original Russian hoax was immediately taken as factual.
https://www.kwtx.com/2025/07/24/gabbards-claims-anti-trump-conspiracy-by-obama-administration-not-supported-by-documents/Quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) - Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard this month declassified material that she claimed proved a "treasonous conspiracy" by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory.
As evidence, Gabbard cited newly declassified emails from Obama officials and a five-year-old classified House report in hopes of undermining the intelligence community's conclusion that Russian Presid
...
Those investigations either concluded or accepted the conclusion that Russia embarked on a campaign to interfere in the election through the use of social media and hacked material.
The House-led probe, conducted by Trump allies, also concurred that Russia ran an election interference campaign but said the purpose was to sow chaos in the U.S. rather than boost Trump. Several of the reports criticize the actions of Obama administration officials, particularly at the FBI, but do not dispute the fundamental findings that Moscow sought to interfere in the election.
...
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified material that she claimed proved a "treasonous conspiracy" by the Obama administration in 2016 to politicize U.S. intelligence in service of casting doubt on the legitimacy of Donald Trump's election victory.(Source: POOL via CNN)
The Associated Press has reviewed those reports to evaluate how Gabbard's claims stack up:
Russian election interference
CLAIM: "The intelligence community had one assessment: that Russia did not have the intent and capability to try to impact the outcome of the U.S. election leading up to Election Day. The same assessment was made after the election." Gabbard to Fox News on Tuesday.
The documents Gabbard released do not support her claim. She cites a handful of emails from 2016 in which officials conclude that Russia had no intention of manipulating the U.S. vote count through cyberattacks on voting systems.
Again, they're omitting the fact that the previous investigations were prevented from seeing a lot of information, intentionally.
How Obama Admin Turned ‘Unverifiable’ Report Into Russiagate Dynamite @paulsperry_ https://t.co/44jsHzf0sZ
— Julie Kelly 🇺🇸 (@julie_kelly2) July 24, 2025
Ellis Wyatt said:
But we have to remind everyone that this IS new information.
Re: Russiagate
— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) July 25, 2025
OK, I am going to state this as plainly and simply as possible. I am fed up with the lies, the cover-ups, the half-truths and the excuses for what was and still is the worst political crime in US history.
READY? These are facts:
1. The Steele Dossier was a… pic.twitter.com/dZsmdbfkK5
will25u said:
From following this from the beginning, this sums it all up nicely with a bow.
Re: Russiagate
OK, I am going to state this as plainly and simply as possible. I am fed up with the lies, the cover-ups, the half-truths and the excuses for what was and still is the worst political crime in US history.
READY? These are facts:
1. The Steele Dossier was a hoax. A fabrication. All of it was a lie. Not a single word was true.
2. Russia never interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump get elected. Never. Ever. Not once. All reports to the contrary are lies.
3. No one in Donald Trump's circle EVER "colluded" with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election. Never. Ever. Not once. All reports to the contrary are lies.
4. Every intelligence estimate from the Obama Administration contradicting #1, #2 or #3 was a deliberate, knowing lie.
5. Every report from Congress, the CIA, the FBI, Mueller and the media claiming accuracy in the above was completely erroneous because each such report treated the lying intelligence estimates from #4 as if they were valid, and their conclusions flowed from such invalid assumptions. (Garbage in, garbage out.)
6. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and each of their direct-report minions knew they were lying.
These are the facts. Indisputable. Undeniable. Facts.
Obama and Hillary and their evil minions and sycophants lied so that Trump would not win the 2016 election. When he did win the election, they lied so that he would never be inaugurated. When he was inaugurated, they lied to cripple his ability to govern.
The only people not actually involved in the "Trump/Russia Collusion" controversy were Trump and Russia.
ARE WE CLEAR?
Hey @NYTimes @WashPost,
— Office of the DNI (@ODNIgov) July 24, 2025
Did you not hear that DNI Gabbard exposed a story with historic implications yesterday? Why the media black out? Why are you afraid to tell the truth to the American people?
Ignoring the culpability of Obama and your deep state sources will not change… pic.twitter.com/Y1hbNDJcTb
Brennan knew that the press had the dossier. It says so right in the addendum. Comey even wrote that CNN was looking for a “news” hook to report on the dossier.
— Brennan’sOrangeJumpsuit (@15poundstogo) July 24, 2025
AND somehow the press knew that it was summarized in a two-page addendum to the ICA. Not one page or three. Exactly… https://t.co/WToZfwDb6S pic.twitter.com/bHHG2abPTk
Big shout out to Andrii Telizhenko in light of Tulsi Gabbard’s stunning revelation that Brennan relied on fake Ukrainian intel to prop up his fraudulent Russia collusion narrative. At the time, Andrii was a diplomat at the Ukrainian Embassy in DC, and he was in the room in… pic.twitter.com/vT8Mg26eiw
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) July 24, 2025
“I hate newspapermen. They come into camp and pick up their camp rumors and print them as facts. I regard them as spies, which, in truth, they are. If I killed them all there would be news from Hell before breakfast.” -Gen. William T. Sherman [H/T to @infantrydort] pic.twitter.com/K4n6szazmy
— Mike Glenn (@MikeRGlenn) July 24, 2025
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump on if Barack Hussein Obama can be criminally prosecuted for the Trump-Russia Treasonous Conspiracy hoax
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 25, 2025
"He has immunity, it probably helps him a lot. He OWES ME BIG. Obama owes me big."
"But it DOESN'T help the people around him AT ALL." pic.twitter.com/WE8nRQkoT3
Krombopulos Michael said:
I am glad someone has a little faith in Trump left.
Quote:
If he takes a pass on HRC and Obama, he needs to be put in the cell right next to all the underlings who committed treason.
Quote:
President Trump and his senior White House staff regarded the House intelligence report as so crucial that Trump reportedly considered going to the CIA before the 2020 election to retrieve and release the report himself. According to my sources at the White House and the House Intelligence Committee, the White House believed in the fall of 2020 that it was crucial for the American people to read this House report before the November 2020 presidential election.
The White House ordered CIA Director Haspel to release the report before the election. She refused.
I received a phone call about this matter in late October 2020 from Lou Dobbs, the host of the Fox Business Network show "Lou Dobbs Tonight" and a close friend of President Trump. I often appeared on Dobbs' show as a former CIA analyst. He called to consult with me about a possible trip by President Trump to CIA headquarters to retrieve the House Intelligence Committee report so he could release it. I told Dobbs that I feared this would not work because CIA Director Haspel would learn about the president's visit in advance and hide the inner safe containing the report before he arrived. Dobbs agreed with me and said he would convey this to President Trump. Trump's alleged visit to the CIA to seize the House report never took place.
I would like to again thank Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard for finally releasing the House Intelligence Committee's critical report on how President Obama, senior Obama officials, and intelligence officials were responsible for issuing a rigged and politicized intelligence assessment just before Donald Trump's first inauguration to destroy his presidency. This fraudulent intelligence report hounded Trump throughout his first term and contributed to his first sham impeachment in 2019. This perversion of U.S. intelligence also did grave damage to the objectivity and trustworthiness of America's intelligence agencies, from which they still have not recovered.
aggiehawg said:
I, for one, feel vindicated as I watched it all unfold in real time in the Mueller thread.
I think what pissed me off the most was that the Mueller investigation knew there was nothing there in September 2017 when they allowed the Title One FISA warrant on Carter Page lapse.
The second thing that torqued me off was the dishonesty when they were drafting the Mueller report and deliberately put all of the secret grand jury stuff in it. That was in direct defiance of a binding DC Circuit Court decision handed down a few months before. Both Rosenstein and incoming AG Barr repeatedly warned Team Mueller not to put grand jury material into the report but they did it anyway. That's how strong they believed their feelz were more important than the law governing their actions within that investigation.
will25u said:
From following this from the beginning, this sums it all up nicely with a bow.Re: Russiagate
— Cynical Publius (@CynicalPublius) July 25, 2025
OK, I am going to state this as plainly and simply as possible. I am fed up with the lies, the cover-ups, the half-truths and the excuses for what was and still is the worst political crime in US history.
READY? These are facts:
1. The Steele Dossier was a… pic.twitter.com/dZsmdbfkK5
Re: Russiagate
OK, I am going to state this as plainly and simply as possible. I am fed up with the lies, the cover-ups, the half-truths and the excuses for what was and still is the worst political crime in US history.
READY? These are facts:
1. The Steele Dossier was a hoax. A fabrication. All of it was a lie. Not a single word was true.
2. Russia never interfered in the 2016 election to help Donald Trump get elected. Never. Ever. Not once. All reports to the contrary are lies.
3. No one in Donald Trump's circle EVER "colluded" with the Russian government to steal the 2016 election. Never. Ever. Not once. All reports to the contrary are lies.
4. Every intelligence estimate from the Obama Administration contradicting #1, #2 or #3 was a deliberate, knowing lie.
5. Every report from Congress, the CIA, the FBI, Mueller and the media claiming accuracy in the above was completely erroneous because each such report treated the lying intelligence estimates from #4 as if they were valid, and their conclusions flowed from such invalid assumptions. (Garbage in, garbage out.)
6. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and each of their direct-report minions knew they were lying.
These are the facts. Indisputable. Undeniable. Facts.
Obama and Hillary and their evil minions and sycophants lied so that Trump would not win the 2016 election. When he did win the election, they lied so that he would never be inaugurated. When he was inaugurated, they lied to cripple his ability to govern.
The only people not actually involved in the "Trump/Russia Collusion" controversy were Trump and Russia.
ARE WE CLEAR?