The Atlantic: Americans are Starting to Sour on Tax Cuts

12,660 Views | 205 Replies | Last: 5 days ago by BigRobSA
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.
Nitro Power
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flat tax rate for everyone or do away with income tax and go to a straight sales tax
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe Americans are tired of being lied to by democrats and their propaganda arm- like the Atlantic.

Most Americans pay almost no income tax.
the most cool guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly nobody who pays taxes is souring on the idea of tax cuts. ****ing morons.
MemphisAg1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I appreciate Donald Trump's leadership to let me keep more of my hard earned money.

It's not the government's money to give back to me. It is mine, from the moment it was earned to the moment it is spent or invested.

And it damn sure isn't the government's role to redistribute my earnings to other people, especially those who can work but choose to leech off the government instead.
rgag12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Atlantic, about as trustworthy as ThePeopleVoice.TV.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
DD88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If they didn't extend the 2017 tax cut and had a $4 Trillion tax hike instead (like the Democrats wanted), the economy would likely tank and any supposed revenue gain from more taxes would be gone.
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nitro Power said:

Flat tax rate for everyone or do away with income tax and go to a straight sales tax


This is the answer.

The reason that poll is that way is because the top 25% pays 87% of the Fed income taxes. The overwhelming majority are largely detached from the consequences of Fed tax policy. THIS is the actual problem. If everyone was paying the same rate, the politicians lowering taxes would win the majority leaving welfare leeches on an island.
TxSquarebody
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't pay as much in taxes as many on here, but it pissed me off, to no end, that it cost me $41 to file through TurboTax and get back $37 of what was stolen from me! Anyone who thinks the "rich don't pay enough" can F the right off!! I lost 4 bucks to l just to not have gun pointed at my head! If you think that's a good thing, look me up in the oldest town in Texas!
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Atlantic as a news source for anything lol!

Wouldn't wipe my ass with it if my only other option was 80 grit sandpaper.
Aggie95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.


Very few people earn $100 million per year. It wouldn't add anything to the treasury. Those numbers usually include stock options, etc. The uber wealthy you are trying to take from are not earning income to pay taxes on.
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lol, I don't believe anything The Atlantic publishes. Nothing but Socialist propaganda.
LOYAL AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.


Envy is a poor character trait.
sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.


why?
Superfreak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah except someone making $600000 AGI is not paying the same rate as an Elon musk. Why are effective tax rates so hard for people to understand?
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.


But why?
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Superfreak said:

Yeah except someone making $600000 AGI is not paying the same rate as an Elon musk. Why are effective tax rates so hard for people to understand?


Everyone should in fact be paying the same rate. Elon. You. Me.


Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.


Nothing about your financial situation or that of the economically 'disadvantaged is a consequence of another person who has $100 million.



Superfreak
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Don't disagree. Just pointing out the naivety of too many people in this country regarding taxes
kb2001
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I followed the links and cannot get to the actual poll. The only thing the OP article says is that Americans oppose the bill. Is it the tax cutting that people oppose, or the rest of bill? I seem to remember a lot of fighting in Congress over the bill and which pork and which grifts get to be incldued. I can't find a clear answer in the article, or the WSJ article it refers to (paywall, so maybe it's there and I can't see it).
Loren Visser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.

What rate should he pay on profits he hasn't recognized?
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a truly stupid premise. Because the BBB is unpopular, that means tax cuts are unpopular?

The BBB got a ton of push back from the right, and 0% of that was targeted at the 2017 tax cuts section. In fact, a significant amount of the criticism of the bill was pointing out that the 2017 cuts should be passed as its own law.
Ribeye-Rare
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.

I disagree. In fact, I would argue that an individual who is earning that much money should get, for lack of a better term, a volume discount on his tax rate as an additional incentive to keep doing what he's doing.

Assuming he's honestly earning that money in a competitive free market, and not just profiting due to fraud or crony capitalism, that SOB is helping the country (and a whole slew of individuals) a whole helluva lot more that some guy who pays little or no taxes.

But, but isn't that tax rate 'regressive,' you ask? Yes it is, and that should not be a bad word and concept that is dismissed out of hand. And 'deflation' shouldn't be either, but that's a discussion for another thread.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Loren Visser said:

Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.

What rate should he pay on profits he hasn't recognized?


60% or higher.

Honestly, I havent put a lot of thought into it, so do not hold me to it.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Loren Visser said:

Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.

What rate should he pay on profits he hasn't recognized?


60% or higher.

Honestly, I havent put a lot of thought into it, so do not hold me to it.


Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

Loren Visser said:

Francis Macomber said:

Quote:

In theory, the proposition seems foolproof: Everyone hates the taxman and loves to keep their money, so a tax cut must be politically popular.

But Republicans' One Big Beautiful Bill Act has tested the theory and found it wanting. A new Wall Street Journal poll shows that more than half of Americans oppose the law, which cuts taxes for many Americans while reducing government spending. That result is in line with other polling. The data journalist G. Elliott Morris notes that only one major piece of legislation enacted since 1990 was nearly so unpopular: the 2017 tax cuts signed by President Donald Trump.

The response to the 2017 cuts was fascinating. Americans grasped that the wealthy would benefit most from the law, but surveys showed that large swathes of the population incorrectly believed that they would not get a break. "If we can't sell this to the American people then we should be in another line of work," Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said at the time. Americans agreed, giving Democrats control of the House a year later.

If tax cuts are no longer political winners, that's a major shift in American politics. McConnell's sentiment reflected the orthodoxy in both parties for more than four decades. Ronald Reagan won the presidency in 1980 by promising to cut taxes, which he didin both 1981 and 1986. The first cut was broadly popular; the second had plurality support. His successor, George H. W. Bush, told voters while campaigning, "Read my lips: no new taxes," and his eventual assent to tax hikes while in office was blamed in part for his 1992 defeat. The next GOP presidenthis son, George W.made popular tax cuts. Democrats Bill Clinton and Barack Obama were careful to back higher income taxes only on the wealthy.


https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2025/07/tax-bill-cuts/683703/?gift=Y4b-QVtwP1iFbBVgbf3hfTzBIwl80TAFCQzPpPWNcFI

My only comment is that it is ridiculous that somebody making $600k a year is paying the same tax rate as Elon Musk. I do not think we should rase rates for majority of people, but once you breach $100 million you should pay a significantly higher rate than the rest of us.

What rate should he pay on profits he hasn't recognized?


60% or higher.

Honestly, I havent put a lot of thought into it, so do not hold me to it.


It's ok. A lot of your fellow liberal brain trust have supposedly put a lot of deep thinking into it and still come up with the same idiotic ideas.
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.


You should pay the same rate as them. If that is 60% for you, then I respect that. See if you can get that passed. I am not paying 60%.

And the bottom earners have to start paying at least net 10%.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
the most cool guy said:

Exactly nobody who pays taxes is souring on the idea of tax cuts. ****ing morons.


I pay taxes in the top bracket. I absolutely hate Musk, Zuck, and Altman pay same percentage I do. Thats horse*****
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

the most cool guy said:

Exactly nobody who pays taxes is souring on the idea of tax cuts. ****ing morons.


I pay taxes in the top bracket. I absolutely hate Musk, Zuck, and Altman pay same percentage I do. Thats horse*****


They actually pay less because they do not make most of their money through income.
shack009
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Francis Macomber said:

rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.


Bro, almost nobody makes that in a year. There are less than 30,000 people in the world who have a net worth of $100,000,000.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tom Fox said:

Francis Macomber said:

rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.


You should pay the same rate as them. If that is 60% for you, then I respect that. See if you can get that passed. I am not paying 60%.

And the bottom earners have to start paying at least net 10%.


I do not make $100m a year, do you?
Tom Fox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis Macomber said:

Tom Fox said:

Francis Macomber said:

rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.


You should pay the same rate as them. If that is 60% for you, then I respect that. See if you can get that passed. I am not paying 60%.

And the bottom earners have to start paying at least net 10%.


I do not make $100m a year, do you?


Nope. I pay right at 30% effective. But every last American should pay the exact same rate. if that is 30% so be it. Same for 10%.
Francis Macomber
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
shack009 said:

Francis Macomber said:

rgag12 said:

Ok, raise taxes broadly across the spectrum then. See if that gets you a "win" with the electorate.



I do not want to raise them across the spectrum, i just want to raise them across those making $100 million or more a year.


Bro, almost nobody makes that in a year. There are less than 30,000 people in the world who have a net worth of $100,000,000.


So? Tax the **** out of the ones that do. In case you've not noticed, we have concentrated wealth more than just about anytime in our country's history.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.