Tex To Replace Chip Roy

7,593 Views | 101 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Got a Natty!
army01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BMX Bandit said:

samurai_science said:

OK, what does he believe and what are his actual actions?


Well, he believes in the soul…

Underrated post.
Deus Vult
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:


... the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.

So that would make you a Nancy Pelosi fan by that logic.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Deus Vult said:

powerbelly said:


... the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.

So that would make you a Nancy Pelosi fan by that logic.


Nope
91AggieLawyer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nm
AggieMD95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CanyonAg77 said:

Quote:

In his campaign announcement, the former slugger vowed to "work with President Trump to secure the border, grow the economy, end radical woke indoctrination, promote American energy independence, defend life and the Second Amendment, end forever wars, and strengthen the military."


Good start


You had me at secure the border
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Texeira was in College Station this week meeting with The Big Truth
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasAggie73 said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


You're right by definition, but I'll take an athlete over somebody that went to law school and has been working in a government elected officeholders spot or office for the last 30 years and don't know **** in the real world


And millionaire ball players know about the real world? You must be kidding.


No, I'm not kidding. I guarantee the majority of them know a lot more about the real world than some person that's been in DC their entire life and never has left the halls of Congress or some bureaucratic DC building.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag said:

Jeebus

Our margins of victory/control are razor thin nationally but some conservatives want to continue with the purity tests.

Just hold the f'ing seat in Congress.


Well, who do you propose them from this congressional district? Do you have somebody that's better?
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Silent For Too Long said:

TheEternalOptimist said:

Dont know enough about him to render a judgement yet.

Had a cool name though for a Ranger.


Why is Tex a cool name for team in southern Oklahoma?


What's up with a name like the Astros in western Louisiana ?
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LegalDrugPusher said:

TexasAggie73 said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


You're right by definition, but I'll take an athlete over somebody that went to law school and has been working in a government elected officeholders spot or office for the last 30 years and don't know **** in the real world


And millionaire ball players know about the real world? You must be kidding.


No, I'm not kidding. I guarantee the majority of them know a lot more about the real world than some person that's been in DC their entire life and never has left the halls of Congress or some bureaucratic DC building.
What do they know about laws and how and why those laws are drafted and interpreted and applied the way they are? Someone primarily tasked with making laws needs to have studied the law extensively and ideally practiced it to be any good at it. You could still learn that stuff in other ways than getting a JD and working as an attorney but there's a reason that's been the default background for our legislators forever.
Morbo the Annihilator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
per say.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Congress is currently full of lawyers

You want more of that?
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
CanyonAg77 said:

Congress is currently full of lawyers

You want more of that?
And airline cockpits are currently full of trained pilots. I would like someone with the requisite skills and knowledge to do their actual very important job, yes.
CanyonAg77
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actual Talking Thermos said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Congress is currently full of lawyers

You want more of that?
And airline cockpits are currently full of trained pilots. I would like someone with the requisite skills and knowledge to do their actual very important job, yes.

So you think only lawyers should be in Congress?

Only farmers in Department of Ag?

Only blue collar workers in Dept of Labor?
Actual Talking Thermos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As I said, I don't think you should have specifically the job of making laws unless you have studied laws and how they work extensively. Not every lawyer is qualified of course, and not every qualified person is a lawyer. I'm skeptical that pro sports is a good background though.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You have a staff to help advise and write laws. Reps don't need legal training to be effective.
Old Gorm
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actual Talking Thermos said:

CanyonAg77 said:

Congress is currently full of lawyers

You want more of that?
And airline cockpits are currently full of trained pilots. I would like someone with the requisite skills and knowledge to do their actual very important job, yes.


The problem is the folks you believe have the requisite KSAs have for the most part fallen well short of standard.

MT has a degree from a school without a single easy course or major in it when he could've sat rich and satisfied with his success in athletics.

Compare that with our last President, a bottom feeder academic and lawyer who ranks as one of the worst politicians and human beings of our age.

But you would have us think Biden a better bet than Texeira. No doubt because of his bottom level ranking from a T3 law school.
Aglaw97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LegalDrugPusher said:

TexasAggie73 said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


You're right by definition, but I'll take an athlete over somebody that went to law school and has been working in a government elected officeholders spot or office for the last 30 years and don't know **** in the real world


And millionaire ball players know about the real world? You must be kidding.


No, I'm not kidding. I guarantee the majority of them know a lot more about the real world than some person that's been in DC their entire life and never has left the halls of Congress or some bureaucratic DC building.

How much is he paying you to promote his name and/or what's in it for you?
BigRobSA
How long do you want to ignore this user?
powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.

His last name starts with "T-E-X", Mofo!

Same as TEXas!!!!
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


By that mentality, you don't think Trump should've been president. Yet he's been the best president we've had in 40 years. I'll never understand why people think that you can't convert from business to politics. Just like Reagan, in fact, just like many presidents who were not politicians before they ran.

In fact, it usually works out better because you're not a career politician. The country should be run as a business, not to increase the wealth of career politicians.

What a weird take you have.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Actual Talking Thermos said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

TexasAggie73 said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


You're right by definition, but I'll take an athlete over somebody that went to law school and has been working in a government elected officeholders spot or office for the last 30 years and don't know **** in the real world


And millionaire ball players know about the real world? You must be kidding.


No, I'm not kidding. I guarantee the majority of them know a lot more about the real world than some person that's been in DC their entire life and never has left the halls of Congress or some bureaucratic DC building.
What do they know about laws and how and why those laws are drafted and interpreted and applied the way they are? Someone primarily tasked with making laws needs to have studied the law extensively and ideally practiced it to be any good at it. You could still learn that stuff in other ways than getting a JD and working as an attorney but there's a reason that's been the default background for our legislators forever.


More than almost every Democrat in office. Now that's a pathetic motley crew. Look how ****ed up our country was under the Biden administration.
Colonel Kurtz
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anybody's an upgrade over Chip Roy
Im Gipper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Colonel Kurtz said:

Anybody's an upgrade over Chip Roy


97% lifetime from Heritage.

This guy sucks!!! We need Lindsay Graham or Elise Stefanik in the Hill County!!

https://heritageaction.com/scorecard/members/R000614


Oh, the drama.

I'm Gipper
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can go from business to politics. I never said otherwise. Go build your strawman somewhere else.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:

You can go from business to politics. I never said otherwise. Go build your strawman somewhere else.


You said: have zero practical application to politics.

Yes, you didn't say business to politics verbatim, but you're already assuming this guy can't do the job. You can be successful in many things and apply it in different ways. So yeah, you kinda did.

How about somebody being an attorney after being in the Navy? Is that somehow more relatable? I'm more practical application? Many of Congress and former presidents have been in completely different businesses and adapted.

So yeah, again, you kinda did.

powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
annie88 said:

powerbelly said:

You can go from business to politics. I never said otherwise. Go build your strawman somewhere else.


You said: have zero practical application to politics.

Yes, you didn't say business to politics verbatim, but you're already assuming this guy can't do the job. You can be successful in many things and apply it in different ways. So yeah, you kinda did.

How about somebody being an attorney after being in the Navy? Is that somehow more relatable? I'm more practical application? Many of Congress and former presidents have been in completely different businesses and adapted.

So yeah, again, you kinda did.




He is a ****ing baseball player. Not a CEO.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:

annie88 said:

powerbelly said:

You can go from business to politics. I never said otherwise. Go build your strawman somewhere else.


You said: have zero practical application to politics.

Yes, you didn't say business to politics verbatim, but you're already assuming this guy can't do the job. You can be successful in many things and apply it in different ways. So yeah, you kinda did.

How about somebody being an attorney after being in the Navy? Is that somehow more relatable? I'm more practical application? Many of Congress and former presidents have been in completely different businesses and adapted.

So yeah, again, you kinda did.




He is a ****ing baseball player. Not a CEO.


So you think being baseball player is the only thing he can manage to do in life? Do you know how many pro players have gone on to successful businesses? Look at Tommy Turberville he was just a football coach.

Are you a one dimensional person? Can you only do one thing in life?

Your arguments are ridiculous. And you're getting awfully upset. We're just having a discussion. Don't get so personally offended and angry. And admit that you're wrong. There are hundreds of examples of people doing something else in their life and going on to being successful in politics.
agsalaska
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


POTD
Got a Natty!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LegalDrugPusher said:

Texeira was in College Station this week meeting with The Big Truth


When it comes to really good info in this realm, you have it. So I don't doubt HG met with MT. Hunter would be good at anything he wanted to do, but I think he is making too much money AND does not have the patience for politics.

Good for Hunter. Bad for Texas.
powerbelly
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tuberville has been a joke. That is exactly what I am talking about.
annie88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
powerbelly said:

Tuberville has been a joke. That is exactly what I am talking about.


So were Obama and Biden and most of the Democrats in office. Most of them being career politicians. That's what I'm talking about. Look how badly they ****ed up our country.

Oh, and by the way, two football players, one baseball player, one hockey player, and one mixed martial arts fighterhave served in the House of Representatives as of the 118th Congress (2023-2024)

I just think to make a definitive statement that people can't make a career change from whatever they're coming from is silly.
shiftyandquick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He wants to increase the deficit, so vote this dude in.

Roy shamed Texas by talking about the deficit.
Ol_Ag_02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:

LegalDrugPusher said:

powerbelly said:


Quote:

His name ID and his net worth alone should put him over the top

I hope he loses just for this alone.


Why?

The recent history of "recognizable" names who have been elected have been extremely disappointing, not to mention the skills that made him rich have zero practical application to politics.


You're right by definition, but I'll take an athlete over somebody that went to law school and has been working in a government elected officeholders spot or office for the last 30 years and don't know **** in the real world


While I agree with you on principle, let's not pretend a rich professional athlete knows anything about the real world.
LegalDrugPusher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Actual Talking Thermos said:

As I said, I don't think you should have specifically the job of making laws unless you have studied laws and how they work extensively. Not every lawyer is qualified of course, and not every qualified person is a lawyer. I'm skeptical that pro sports is a good background though.


I think sports is a great background actually and I know a lot of companies that love to hire former athletes who played collegiate or professionally
ts5641
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm assuming this district is safe for the GOP?
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.