Texas A&M Football
Sponsored by

Klein (ugh) and EJ Smith (whoop)

8,829 Views | 71 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by AgLA06
Bison
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
northeastag said:

GCP12 said:

We scored 45 points

52, actually. I'm not counting the phantom holding call against Bisontis.

He gets hit with at least one every single game, it seems.

I think it would be interesting for him to play a game with his hands taped, Seventies-style, and see if they're fool enough to throw a flag against him then.
Aftermath
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
CK will get lots of offers. Our O is the best it's been since Johnny…. Only an idiot would complain about a 7-0 first place , past mid season in the SEC…..
Kansas Kid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TX_Aggie37 said:

Klein has been really good. He should have ran the ball there. Both can be true.

You realize a large part of why the runs are working is because of the threat of the pass. If he always runs the ball in that scenario, teams will stop it and the offense grinds to a halt.
rsf0626
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's no way in hell we're complaining about CK right now. He almost called a perfect game

I'm way more concerned about the defense
Vegas
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aggie Dad 26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kansas Kid said:

TX_Aggie37 said:

Klein has been really good. He should have ran the ball there. Both can be true.

You realize a large part of why the runs are working is because of the threat of the pass. If he always runs the ball in that scenario, teams will stop it and the offense grinds to a halt.


You're being a little too realistic. Maybe try, Reddit?
Aston04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Klein's offense really put up 52 points- absent the refs stealing 7.

stfu.
merch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a terrible take. Offense could do anything it wanted. Terrible call or offense scores 50. And we are questioning play calling? I thought he mixed things up well. Gassed DL cant rush the passer...why it was so easy to pass and Reed was so effective with legs as well. Very little to complain about as far as Klein yearsrday.

Nothing looks more foolish than tradition to those who have none.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DTX_12 said:

What I've learned from the average Ag fan is that the only thing acceptable is being literally perfect....


So, you onviously missed the point. The while point is not about being perfect- it is about MISSING THE OBVIOUS!

which btw you did too....
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey OP, I gifting you a million dollars.


OP: it's all in one's? I don't want it.
Emilio Fantastico
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Klein calls a good game probably 90% of the time. But every game he has his WTF moments.

He has still been way better than anything we've had n a long time.
Wicked Good Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fact that 30 plus people have agreed with OP kinda shows how unhappy we are no matter the outcome
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If people can't see the potential and change in EJ this year then you just can't be helped. Give me more!
Slicer97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
StinkyPinky said:

If people can't see the potential and change in EJ this year than you
Just can't be helped. Give me more!


EJ was impressive last night. Completely different player than last year. Good to see him stepping up.
Dr. Mephisto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EJ showed more growth in this game than he ever has before.

He was rock star good for us when we needed it most.

Gig 'em EJ! KEEP IT UP!
Buzzkill
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How is it even possible to complain about the offense after that game?


Honestly, there have been really long stretches, years maybe, where the Aggies never sniffed 45 points against real competition.

Let's enjoy it.
usmcbrooks
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Slicer97 said:

StinkyPinky said:

If people can't see the potential and change in EJ this year than you
Just can't be helped. Give me more!


EJ was impressive last night. Completely different player than last year. Good to see him stepping up.


Wasn't he just coming off a serious injury last year?
agchugger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EJ Smith got passed by Morrow in the depth chart and I don't think he saw the field until the second half. He looked good which was nice but he's our 3rd string (4th when Moss is healthy). Daniels is the one who has really been passed. He's a good Ag, but I always thought he was the least talented runner. It's nice to have this depth and it hurts less this year losing Moss than last year. I'm all for EJ making the most of his carries but only after Owen's and Morrow get there's first. Let's not freak out over the OC not calling a play for our 3rd string RB.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Divining Rod said:

WTF with CK? Sometimes he seems to be totally detached from whats happening on the field and the game situation.

We just ran Smith for8 yards, 13yds and 3 yds, and the broadcasters are talking about how gassed their DL is, standing with hands on their hips or knees gasping for air.

Meanwhile Smith is running like Rodney Thomas (or Moss, if you will) bowling over people and showing great vision.

It's now 2nd and 7 on their 17yd line, looking to go up by 14.

So we start PASSING the ball on next two downs and kick a FG.

Sometimes i think he gets carried away playing with all his little shiny toys so he can show hiw clever he is.

RUN THE DAMN BALL when you have them totally beat and your rushing game is clicking.





I wore my simple white Aggie hat on the golf course yesterday that says "Run the damn ball" on the front.
Muy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agchugger said:

EJ Smith got passed by Morrow in the depth chart and I don't think he saw the field until the second half. He looked good which was nice but he's our 3rd string (4th when Moss is healthy). Daniels is the one who has really been passed. He's a good Ag, but I always thought he was the least talented runner. It's nice to have this depth and it hurts less this year losing Moss than last year. I'm all for EJ making the most of his carries but only after Owen's and Morrow get there's first. Let's not freak out over the OC not calling a play for our 3rd string RB.


He wasn't running like a 3rd stringer, that's the point. If we are gashing their D in the running game, don't trick up the O. Keep crushing their D with what's working.

Jimbo did this at Bama when Achane was killing them the 2nd half. Throws a dumbass pass to the cone from like the 2 yard line and we lose the game.
sharpdressedman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EJ's amazing second effort to get the 4th and 1 first down may have saved the win.
Aggie_Nuke
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

We scored 45 points

...... and they scored 42 ! winning by 3 points is nothing to get excited about, much less to use as justification for the way we played overall.


The ONLY valid ANNUAL goal for ALL Aggie Sports is a NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP!

Gig'em !
FTAC '73
Agit8r
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Nuke said:

GCP12 said:

We scored 45 points

...... and they scored 42 ! winning by 3 points is nothing to get excited about, much less to use as justification for the way we played overall.

Quick summary:
Offense - good
Defense - bad
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TAMUallen said:

Dont question him, some posters will attack you

Only when the questions are dumb. We scored 45 points. The problem last night wasn't Klein and the offense.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Aggie_Nuke said:

GCP12 said:

We scored 45 points

...... and they scored 42 ! winning by 3 points is nothing to get excited about, much less to use as justification for the way we played overall.

Them scoring 42 points has nothing to do with Klein or his offense.
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rsf0626 said:

There's no way in hell we're complaining about CK right now. He almost called a perfect game

I'm way more concerned about the defense

I feel very certain that this defensive performance was a one-off and will be corrected by the next game.
Jarrin Jay
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's cute, but you do NOT know what plays were called on the resulting pass plays. Were they RPOs, did we have a run play called and Reed checked to a pass based on the D look, we have a 2 way play called based on the alignment and pre-snap motion of the defense…?

MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jarrin Jay said:

That's cute, but you do NOT know what plays were called on the resulting pass plays. Were they RPOs, did we have a run play called and Reed checked to a pass based on the D look, we have a 2 way play called based on the alignment and pre-snap motion of the defense…?



Methinks that playcalling logic and knowledge such as this goes right over the head of the OP.
goags2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Owens 56? yard TD run gets called back for holding.
I'd think his legs might me a little tired, but Klein gives to him again for short gain.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MooreTrucker said:

TAMUallen said:

Dont question him, some posters will attack you

Only when the questions are dumb. We scored 45 points. The problem last night wasn't Klein and the offense.


Do you REALLY think this was a post complaining about our offense?

It was a post complaining about a particular issue I have with Klein. If you want to disagree that we absolutely should have continued running the ball, do so and state your reasons.

There are a lot of people here who either are bad at English or bad at football, or both.

I'm proud of our O last night. I'm not happy with what Klein did in the red zone that drive.

So many lightweights here would sing a diffrrent tune if our D gave up 46pts and that FG possibly cost us the game.

THATS the difference- I'm complaining about a particular problem, and not many want to present a reasonable argument opposing it.

There were a few good posts taking an opposing view- and I appreciate those.
Divining Rod
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jarrin Jay said:

That's cute, but you do NOT know what plays were called on the resulting pass plays. Were they RPOs, did we have a run play called and Reed checked to a pass based on the D look, we have a 2 way play called based on the alignment and pre-snap motion of the defense…?




That's cute, but you obviously just shot this off the top of your head. We took Smith out, replaced him with a WR , took out a TE and replaced with another WR, and went to an empty backfield. Klein changed our personnel to switch to a 5- split receiver passing attack.

All that obviously before we knew what Ark D would be.

p.s. I will give you this though. T Ohrstrom was WIDE OPEN (right in the line of sight of Reed) and had a sure 1st down and probable TD). Major mistake by Reed throwing a huge degree of difficulty pass to the back corner end zone of a covered receiver,
or else that was the go-to call from the beginning. probably the latter.

Luigi Vampa
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If you only pass in obvious passing situations which it seems is what you want, then your offense is very obvious. Hth
TX_Aggie37
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Frank Grimes said:

TX_Aggie37 said:

Klein has been really good. He should have ran the ball there. Both can be true.

Should have run

Thanks, doctor.
greg.w.h
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Happy for EJ and his family. Hope he continues to compete for playing time!
ironmanag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The Zoo has proven two things. They can never be happy and they are simply waiting for us to lose.
Page 2 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.