The offside is correct. A drop kick for a whistle from the stands, negating a PK, is so bad.
Can't play the ball with your arm in soccer. So the arm isn't considered for offside.GrapevineAg said:
I hate that an attacker actually has to look at specific parts of the defender to stay onside. The defender's arm was behind the attacker but not his foot. I understand the rule, I just don't like it.
I'm 100% for Curacao here, but I think they're lucky to not lose this game 2-1. That slide tackle by the GK (Eloy Room) was a bad foul. Referee was out of position and not focused on that play. I thought VAR should've sent that down and bailed him out of this huge missed PK call. VAR, somehow, had a check complete. Canada should've gotten a PK there.oh no said:
Good finish.
Should be 2-1 curaao from first pen or even 3-1 from that handled ball a few mins ago
Quote:
UNITED STATES
Have qualified and will top the group with a win or draw against Haiti.
If the U.S. lose, Saudi Arabia would need to win with a goal-difference swing of seven goals to steal first place.
SAUDI ARABIA
Win: Qualify, almost certainly in second place
Draw: Qualify, as long as Haiti do not win (see Haiti section)
Lose: Cannot qualify
HAITI
Win: They have a couple of routes. Haiti qualify as long as Saudi Arabia do not lose to Trinidad and Tobago by five or more goals (which puts Trinidad and Tobago through). If Saudi Arabia draw, it comes down to goal difference and goals scored, and Haiti are through if they win by two or more goals. If Haiti win by one goal and goal difference is identical (e.g. 1-0, 1-1) then Saudi Arabia are second on head to head.
Cannot qualify with a draw or loss.
TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
Win: Have to get the victory over Saudi Arabia, and they will be through if Haiti draw or lose. If Haiti win, Trinidad and Tobago must win by five or more goals to finish second on goal difference.
Cannot qualify with a draw or loss.
jessexy said:Can't play the ball with your arm in soccer. So the arm isn't considered for offside.GrapevineAg said:
I hate that an attacker actually has to look at specific parts of the defender to stay onside. The defender's arm was behind the attacker but not his foot. I understand the rule, I just don't like it.