Official Hall of Fame Discussion

9,281 Views | 217 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by TarponChaser
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok, since no one wants to really discuss Tommy John, let's move on.

This time I'm going to be a bit controversial. This week's guy is Manny Machado, and I don't think he should get in.

The counting stats are going to be there for him, he just got his 2000th hit last night, and he's only 33. But to me, he's the poster child for the huge advantage that guys have when they debut at a really young age. He broke into the bigs as a full time regular at 19 years old. And since that time he's been durable and mostly good and sometimes really good. He's never won an MVP, although he came close a couple of times, and his defense rates as average, especially as he put on about 30 pounds compared to the young version of himself.

And here's the quick comparison I'm going to draw, and I encourage all of you to look at these two career stat lines to see how similar they purely from a numbers standpoint.

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/y/youngmi02.shtml

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/m/machama01.shtml

Michael Young, who didn't get even a second chance on the ballot, has roughly the same numbers in his career that Machado does and at this point they've played in a similar number of games.

Batting Average - Young .300 / Machado .280
Hits - Young 2375 / Machado 2001
Doubles - Young 441 / Machado 384
Triples - Young 60 / Machado 18
Homers - Young 185 / Machado 357
OPS - Young .787 / Machado .827
RBIs - Young 1030 / Machado 1102
OPS+ - Young 104 / Machado 125

They've both been infielders that have moved around to different positions, MY has one gold glove, and Machado has two.

The biggest difference above is obviously the Homeruns, which lead to an OPS and OPS+ advantage for Machado, but that has to make you think, is the Hall of Fame really all about homers?

The biggest difference in these two careers, is that Manny will compile for at least 8 more years because of how young he was when he debuted, and because of the asinine extension the Padres gave him. Everyone around the game loved and respected Michael Young, while everyone knows that Machado is a dewshnozzle. Young debuted at 23 and wasn't a regular until 24. If you give him even 3 more years as a regular, then he's probably up above 2850 hits, and someone gives him the chance to get to 3000, and he doesn't retire at 36.

Now to be clear, I'm not using this to argue that MY should be in the hall of fame, by all metrics he was a really good baseball player, but not a hall of famer. I'm using these numbers to show that Machado, despite popular perception that he's on track to make the hall of fame, isn't really much more than a guy who's going to have a chance to compile a lot of counting numbers because of how young he was when he debuted. Compare his numbers to Berkman (144 OPS+!!!) and again you'll see how debuting late (college kids are particularly hit hard by this) means guys just don't have the ability to compile numbers like the Machados, Sotos, Witts of the world do.

This again goes back to my rough methodology for looking at a guy as a hall of famer. I have to think, was he the best at his position for a period of time. (Machado is a no for me there, for those not wanting to do the research, he only has 2 silver sluggers, and 6 all star selections while MY had 7 and Berkman had 6) Did he win major awards (MVP) again a no. Was he key to a championship team (no).

Stat compiling SHOULD not be the deciding factor on making the Hall. Machado and other early debuters will always have a HUGE and unfair advantage over the guys that don't become regulars until they are 23-25 years old. I mean, hell, look at Soto, he's 26 and almost has as many career hits as Aaron Judge (33) because Judge became a regular in 2017 and Soto did in 2018. If we gave Judge 6 more years of prime, he'd already be over 500 and maybe closing in on 600 career homers with a legit chance at dethroning Barry Bonds. As it stands now though, he's probably going to finish with 550 or so. He'll make the hall, but his prime is worthy of being considered inner inner inner circle hall, like Babe Ruth and Ted Williams inner circle, but he won't finish with counting stats that tell that story.

TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The idea that breaking into MLB at a younger age is an "unfair advantage" is absurd. Those guys are generally just better earlier. It's part of the game.

As for Joss, just because he's in doesn't mean DeGrom should be. It's pretty clear Joss's numbers don't warrant it and some ancient, grizzled sportswriter had some sort of crusade for the guy and managed to browbeat enough of the other ancient, grizzled sportswriters into not only changing the rules for him but getting him in via the Veterans Committee.

It may be unfair but the prior inclusion of unworthy guys does not justify future inclusion of unworthy guys.
Faustus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If deGrom were to die tomorrow it might give him a leg up too on waiving the counting stats with a veteran committee.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And Machado's numbers, except for BA, are way better than Young. Barring injury he's a lock for 400 HR with a very good shot at 500 too. That being said, I think that unless he gets to say, 480 HR I think he's in the Hall of Very Good.

For a position player/hitter I don't think anybody with a career OPS under .800 should sniff the Hall unless you're an absolute defensive wizard (see Ozzie Smith).
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Once a kid goes to college he's locked there for 3 years, that means best case scenario is like Skenes and starting pro ball at 21 and becoming a big league regular at 22.

Guys like Soto start at a pro academy at like 14 and sign at 16. Rookie ball at 17. It's definitely unfair if counting stats are something we value.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

Once a kid goes to college he's locked there for 3 years, that means best case scenario is like Skenes and starting pro ball at 21 and becoming a big league regular at 22.

Guys like Soto start at a pro academy at like 14 and sign at 16. Rookie ball at 17. It's definitely unfair if counting stats are something we value.

That's like saying it's unfair tall dudes have an advantage in basketball.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree Machado is better than Young, my point was that Young got like zero support and Machado has 1st ballot momentum and their numbers aren't crazy different.

I'm also curious why you think 480 makes Manny more of a hall of famer than like 430. Homers are great, but accumulating 480 over 22 years doesn't really do much for me. I want more of a total picture of what a guy brings to the table.

https://www.cooperstowncred.com/the-not-quite-hall-of-fame-career-of-michael-young/

Some cool stats in the above article about Young.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

I agree Machado is better than Young, my point was that Young got like zero support and Machado has 1st ballot momentum and their numbers aren't crazy different.

I'm also curious why you think 480 makes Manny more of a hall of famer than like 430. Homers are great, but accumulating 480 over 22 years doesn't really do much for me. I want more of a total picture of what a guy brings to the table.

https://www.cooperstowncred.com/the-not-quite-hall-of-fame-career-of-michael-young/

Some cool stats in the above article about Young.


Well 50 HR are a lot. I don't think that Machado gets in at 480 but there will be people who make the case that he should. I think his overall career is not HOF level unless he's able to compile stats to reach that level.

Longevity is part of greatness.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't understand what you're talking about.

Height is a physical trait

When you start pro baseball is determined by 100 factors and directly impacts your ability to accumulate counting stats like hits, homers, RBIs etc.

Judge would always have been 6'7" no matter when he debuted, but because he debuted later, he never had a chance at 750 homers.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

I don't understand what you're talking about.

Height is a physical trait

When you start pro baseball is determined by 100 factors and directly impacts your ability to accumulate counting stats like hits, homers, RBIs etc.

Judge would always have been 6'7" no matter when he debuted, but because he debuted later, he never had a chance at 750 homers.

The point is that all of it plays into your career and fairness doesn't enter into it.

Whining about fairness over when a player debuts or how long they play or injuries is asinine. Fairness doesn't play into it. And if you debut too late to reach certain milestones then that's just tough. Just because you debut earlier doesn't mean you have a longer career either- at the end of the day, even if Soto plays longer than Judge he's not likely to pass him up in hits, HR, RBI, etc.

Aaron Judge has been historically great over his 10 year career but if he blows out a knee tomorrow and doesn't play another game he doesn't get into the HOF. That's just how it is.

The reason I brought up height in basketball is because it's just one of those things that can't be controlled and might not be fair that plays into it all. If Judge is 6'2" instead of 6'7" the odds he'd have a shot at MLB would be much, much lower- his freakish size and strength give him an advantage in hitting HR.

It's just how it is. I'm 6'3" so I got recruited and played D1 (FBS) football while my younger brother is 5'11" and the only offers he had to play college football were D1-AA (now FCS) but if he were 6'1" he probably has tons of FBS level programs offering him. It's just how it works.
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Considering all the "real-life perks' that any American player would get over anyone in a Spanish-speaking country - nutrition, real coaching from an early age, organized leagues, academics, etc. - it's hard to think the foreign players in academies are enjoying some sort of advantage over the American guys who go to college.

A guy like Soto who is up and contributing at age 20 is incredibly rare.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This years All-Star game has me thinking about using the number of All-Star appearances a guy has in his career as a HOF resume line.

Kershaw and now Misiorowski.

Kershaw was literally just plopped on the team by the comissioner. He isn't having an all-star season this year.

Misiorowski has been INSANE....but he has played in 5 of his teams 94 games (pitched in 3% of their innings).

I know...."It's an exhibition game! It's baseball's celebration! It's for the fans enjoyment!"

I also know it's been happening for a long time (Ripken in '01, Mays in '73, etc.)

It just seems weird to point to the number of times a guy is invited to an exhibition game with nillywilly qualifications as an achievement to bolster an argument that he is or isn't a Hall of Famer.

Feels like it's really just to get eyeballs on the TV and now try to show MLB is relevant and cool like the Bananas.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That Kershaw thing is a total joke.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At least Ripken got voted in by the fans in '01
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jeff Bagwell was only a 4-time all-star -- in part because of Coors Field and the gaudy numbers the Rockies' first basemen put up thru the years

Robin Yount was only a 3-time all-star during his 20-year career. Was not an all-star in his 1989 MVP season
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a complex one, I'd say not all all star selections are always earned, and with replacements for injuries were up to 80 all stars this year. YIKES!

But, I'd say that on average anyone with 8+ all star selections was likely a bad ass and a hall of famer.

Anyone under 8 and you're going to have to look at context to decide if they were a hall of fame worthy.

Basically my argument here is that individual selections could be aberrant, but in the aggregate guys with lost of selections were very likely really really good for a long time and earned most of those selections.

https://www.mlb.com/news/active-players-with-most-all-star-selections

If you omit the relievers on this list, the 8 selections cut line pretty much works. Salvador Perez being one that we might need to discuss later, and obviously some of his selections come from the "every team has to have an all star rule"
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgRyan04 said:

This years All-Star game has me thinking about using the number of All-Star appearances a guy has in his career as a HOF resume line.

Kershaw and now Misiorowski.

Kershaw was literally just plopped on the team by the comissioner. He isn't having an all-star season this year.

Misiorowski has been INSANE....but he has played in 5 of his teams 94 games (pitched in 3% of their innings).

I know...."It's an exhibition game! It's baseball's celebration! It's for the fans enjoyment!"

I also know it's been happening for a long time (Ripken in '01, Mays in '73, etc.)

It just seems weird to point to the number of times a guy is invited to an exhibition game with nillywilly qualifications as an achievement to bolster an argument that he is or isn't a Hall of Famer.

Feels like it's really just to get eyeballs on the TV and now try to show MLB is relevant and cool like the Bananas.

The Phillies trashed MLB yesterday for Misiorowski making the team.

https://www.espn.com/mlb/story/_/id/45730740/phillies-rip-mlb-adding-jacob-misiorowski-all-star-roster
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's obviously silly to put Miz on the all star team after 5 starts. Glad Trea Turner spoke up, I'm also a little surprised that Miz said yes, it's going to be a bit embarrassing for him to be there with dudes in the clubhouse thinking he doesn't belong in there.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AggieEP said:

It's obviously silly to put Miz on the all star team after 5 starts. Glad Trea Turner spoke up, I'm also a little surprised that Miz said yes, it's going to be a bit embarrassing for him to be there with dudes in the clubhouse thinking he doesn't belong in there.


To be fair, they were talking about this on the Yankees/Cubs broadcast yesterday and indicated that two Phillies pitchers were asked before Miz was asked but both declined

I still think it's crazy he was the next call
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I saw that the Phillies pitchers were given "conditional" all star invites based on agreeing to pitch.

If that's where we are with things then we need to rethink what the all star game is. Find a way to make it a showcase event again.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Phils didnt want to pay bonuses
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
W said:

Jeff Bagwell was only a 4-time all-star -- in part because of Coors Field and the gaudy numbers the Rockies' first basemen put up thru the years

Robin Yount was only a 3-time all-star during his 20-year career. Was not an all-star in his 1989 MVP season


That shocked me.

I know that Kirk Gibson was never named to an All-Star team in his career, including his MVP season
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The number of All-Star appearances is a weird way to make a case for a player. It's basically a combination of how good you are in the first halves of your career, plus staying popular. Plus there is the weird rule where each team has to have a representative.

I like the All-MLB teams at the end of the season. It's only been around 5 years, but it's a much better award to look back at to judge someone's career.
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agreed, but popularity also plays into hall of fame voting. Just recently we watched Curt Schilling not get real consideration because he's taken some unpopular political stances and said some dumb stuff.

I'm not saying I want to let guys in the Hall based on all star appearances, but as a rough tool it gives you an idea of relevance/star power over a long period of time.

If you can't make an all star team when 80 guys are picked... to me it likely means you aren't hall of fame material. (Different discussion for old timers like Yount)

https://www.espn.com/blog/sweetspot/post/_/id/49786/how-robin-yount-made-just-three-all-star-teams
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What a relevant video for our previous conversation.

TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Farmer1906 said:

Sure there are exceptions but Javier is a curious example for you. He throws max effort to get as much velo as he can while also maximizing spin. The high spin 4 seam was (is still somewhat) a major theme from 2017 thru now. He is still a 5 and dive type. Hes not getting by with control and precision. Hes throwing to get chase at the top and then with the wipeout slider.


My mention of Javier was unrelated to his effort level but more the fact that when healthy he was dominant even at that relatively pedestrian 94 velo because of movement and deception.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Due to the fact he spent his entire career toiling away in obscurity for a crappy Reds team I overlooked him but Joey Votto is making the Hall, right?

Career .294 hitter, .920 OPS, 144 OPS+, and for you WAR geeks he retired at 63.6.

I don't have a strong feeling for him either way but evidently lots of folks consider him a lock.
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Without a doubt.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yes
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was looking at Jeff Kent's numbers again today (if you didn't know, his son Kaeden played for us).....he should be in the HOF
redline248
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TarponChaser said:

Due to the fact he spent his entire career toiling away in obscurity for a crappy Reds team I overlooked him but Joey Votto is making the Hall, right?

Career .294 hitter, .920 OPS, 144 OPS+, and for you WAR geeks he retired at 63.6.

I don't have a strong feeling for him either way but evidently lots of folks consider him a lock.
Why is he a lock when .293, .943 OPS, 144 OPS+ and 52 WAR didn't make it 2 years on the ballot? Oh and hit more homers in fewer years than Votto, too.
TarponChaser
How long do you want to ignore this user?
redline248 said:

TarponChaser said:

Due to the fact he spent his entire career toiling away in obscurity for a crappy Reds team I overlooked him but Joey Votto is making the Hall, right?

Career .294 hitter, .920 OPS, 144 OPS+, and for you WAR geeks he retired at 63.6.

I don't have a strong feeling for him either way but evidently lots of folks consider him a lock.
Why is he a lock when .293, .943 OPS, 144 OPS+ and 52 WAR didn't make it 2 years on the ballot? Oh and hit more homers in fewer years than Votto, too.


I'm not saying either should be but I've heard a lot of talk when Votto retired how he was a lock.

I think Kent gets dinged for playing in the steroid era even though I don't think he was ever implicated or accused of using. But, IIRC, he has more homers than any other 2B. That might be reason enough. I forget his defensive rep though.
W
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
generally speaking...I think Kent is considered clean.

37 is the most he hit in any season (2002). 33 is his second highest total (2000)

in 2001 -- a big steroid year -- he only hit 22 homers in 607 at-bats

every year of his career...he hit more doubles than home runs
Farmer1906
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kent has a strong argument for the best power-hitting 2B of all time. He's likely a below-average player when compared to the rest of the second basemen in the Hall. If you compare only the last 40-50 years, very few second basemen have made the HOF. I believe it's Morgan (barely makes this huge window), Sandberg, Alomar, and Biggio.

Compare him to Utley, Whitaker, Altuve, Cano, Kinsler, Pedroia, Cano (juice!), Soriano, Semien, Marte, & Lowe. The guys who missed the HOF or are still playing. As of now, my list goes 1. Altuve 2. Utley 3. Kent.

You take the 4 in plus 3 more. 7 HOFers at a position over ~50 years. That still feels low.
AgRyan04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just read that Frank Robinson wasn't even on 90% of the votes the year he made it into the Hall. That is mind bogglingly asinine.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.