millionaires

618,245 Views | 2673 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by Ag92NGranbury
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Well once you hit critical mass in your retirement of around $500,000 that's when compounding really takes effect. You'll make much more or possibly lose in a down market but generally make more in just compounding than what you can contribute. I read your post and you said you have $2MM. So if you have to back off contributing for financial reasons you'll be fine. A 20% up market is 400k. I realize we could have a bear and you could lose (on paper ) a lot but just stay the course it will go up over time.


That's helpful, too. Worst case scenario would be I have to stop contributing completely for some period of time. If that happened, I would also lose my pension (which will prob contribute somewhere in the 400-500k range, if I retire at 55).

401k, Roth, and IRA are right around 1.4MM. Of those 3, the only account I'm actively adding to is the 401k. The other 2 are growth only.

I have a really great FA, but we actually haven't discussed worst case scenario.
EliteZags
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
just curious in what situation has the FA recommending no longer contributing to Roth
imagine I plan to max backdoor remainder of my working years and even beyond in regular if have enough side income after
bagger05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Got a call tomorrow with my accountant. Key point of conversation is maximizing time in Cali while minimizing taxes.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EliteZags said:

just curious in what situation has the FA recommending no longer contributing to Roth
imagine I plan to max backdoor remainder of my working years and even beyond in regular if have enough side income after


I don't contribute to my original Roth because I have to backdoor because of the income limits. Since I now also have an IRA, I can't do the backdoor without negative tax implications. My yearly contributions get treated as taxable income when I do my taxes. I would get that back eventually, but not until I start taking from the Roth, and even then it's prorated. So it's just a big headache.

I now do the mega backdoor Roth, which means all my contributions end up in my 401k.
Texag5324
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXTransplant said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Well once you hit critical mass in your retirement of around $500,000 that's when compounding really takes effect. You'll make much more or possibly lose in a down market but generally make more in just compounding than what you can contribute. I read your post and you said you have $2MM. So if you have to back off contributing for financial reasons you'll be fine. A 20% up market is 400k. I realize we could have a bear and you could lose (on paper ) a lot but just stay the course it will go up over time.


That's helpful, too. Worst case scenario would be I have to stop contributing completely for some period of time. If that happened, I would also lose my pension (which will prob contribute somewhere in the 400-500k range, if I retire at 55).

401k, Roth, and IRA are right around 1.4MM. Of those 3, the only account I'm actively adding to is the 401k. The other 2 are growth only.

I have a really great FA, but we actually haven't discussed worst case scenario.

One thing you could do to give yourself an immediate raise is stop using a financial advisor and manage everything on your own. With your net worth, you are likely paying $10k+ a year for them to manage your finances. Thats hundreds of thousands of dollars in overall fees you're paying throughout your lifetime.
EvenPar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If one were to do that, does Vanguard or similar companies offer lines of credit on invested capital?

That's a large benefit for some that have millions with an FA, is the opportunity to arbitrage from a LOC.
TXTransplant
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Appreciate the advice. I'm comfortable with the fees I'm paying right now because 1) the firm doesn't manage all of my assets (only a small fraction) and 2) due to a mistake on their end, I'm actually paying less than what I should be.

This firm manages an IRA that is a rollover from a 403b that had annuities as part of the portfolio. It's been a headache from the start, and I'm happy to have someone else dealing with TIAA and their stupid policies. This is an on-going issue, and will be for some time. I basically could not roll over the entire account and TIAA will only roll over a fraction every month for something like 20 years.

So, for now, having their assistance has been helpful. I've seen good growth in the fund that they manage, so it's a sacrifice I'm willing to make in the short term.

With that said, I don't have plans to turn my entire portfolio over to them, or use their services for the rest of my life. They did recently mention in passing the idea of rolling over more of my 401k into the account they manage. I heard them but am blowing it off for now because I'm not comfortable doing that.
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

Tex117 said:

Proposition Joe said:


You shouldn't compare yourself to the joneses.


The Joneses wasn't really my point. It was a description of a certain type of person (they tend to tell you how well their asset classes do) in certain asset classes and why boring can really feel boring (because its less socially acceptable to brag about how much a basic brokerage/401k goes up). But is incredibly effective long term.

But, one shouldn't compare themselves to the Joneses anyway. I didn't say anything about parents helping them out...or whatever.


Like I said I agree with the bulk of your post, but you made the tortoise and the hare comparison -- implying that those cryptobros and the like got out to a fast start and like to point out how fast they've accumulated wealth but the guys grinding away making sacrifices at their corporate job socking x% away every year will be the ones to finish the race first.

And I'm pointing out that if you're going to play the comparison game, you shouldn't assume the "hares" aren't going to finish the race first. Because many of them are -- in fact I'd say just from an overall wealth standpoint those hares (cryptobros, tech traders) will make up a far larger percentage of newly minted millionaires/multi-millionaires/whatever than the tortoises slogging away at their W-2 jobs.

To use another animal analogy -- there are a lot of different ways to skin a cat. Don't assume the guys doing it faster than you aren't also doing it better.

Be happy getting to where you want to get, don't try and cheapen others who are where they are.

Wasn't the discussion I was really wanting to have, but here we are.

Sure, in some cases the hare will wiin. But, in some cases, the hare will lose. The hares don't often tell you when they lose alot, or that their real estate value isn't going up as much. Etc. Etc.

This is a strange tangent.

Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.

Good advice. I know for me, Im going to have a hard time following it (ie, forcing myself to spend it). There is a number I have in mind that when I hit it, I may be able to start loosening the reigns.
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TXTransplant said:

Question: I realize this is anecdotal, and every situation will be different but that's ok.

Once you reached the 1MM mark, how long did it take you to double that? And then double that again?

It's taken me 5 years to go from 1MM to 2 (2020-2025). I realize that there are tons of factors and variables in this, but I'm curious and just want to hear different experiences.

All answers are appreciated, but my specific situation is a corporate cube-dweller maxing out 401k, HSA, Roth, IRA, etc., as well as a modest personal investment account. No stock options, windfalls, or real estate sales. Home equity excluded from that number. I'm asking about growth of cash savings/investments.

Typically, following general compounding rules is that 1MM turns to 2MM in 8 years. (assuming all in one brokerage account).
RangerRick9211
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EvenPar said:

If one were to do that, does Vanguard or similar companies offer lines of credit on invested capital?

That's a large benefit for some that have millions with an FA, is the opportunity to arbitrage from a LOC.

FAs offer a line-of-credit? Or do they team with a bank? The first if heard of this.

Also not sure of the arbitrage opportunity. Buy, Borrow, Die get's pretty complicated for us normies. Secure backed loans just aren't attractive for my bracket (~8% rate, https://www.wellsfargoadvisors.com/why-wells-fargo/products-services/lending/securities-based.html ).

I'm still a few years away from withdrawing anything, but I've looked into the normal options vs. selling: margin (IBKR has the lowest rates + interest is deductible, but still not favorable rates for my bracket), box spread loans (very viable to manipulate MAGI year-to-year; spooky, though), reverse mortgage (bleh), HELOC (bleh), 401(k) loan (bleh), and covered calls (viable and will).

I like the idea of continuing to be tax efficient in the burndown phase of our life. It just feels too right. I also want to retain as much as possible (while still living our best lives) for the step-up treatment on whatever we pass down. But also have to model out future RMDs and IRMAA bracket. Bleg. Thankfully I got Projection Lab on the lifetime sub while it was still affordable.

Stuff like chasing options premium or leverage/box spreads within a withdrawal context are very interesting to me!
AgsMyDude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.



Does a stupid person take advantage of a 1.95% loan on an 8-year-old used vehicle, and invest the rest in the market, as opposed to paying cash up front?

Asking for a friend
Proposition Joe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tex117 said:

Proposition Joe said:

Tex117 said:

Proposition Joe said:


You shouldn't compare yourself to the joneses.


The Joneses wasn't really my point. It was a description of a certain type of person (they tend to tell you how well their asset classes do) in certain asset classes and why boring can really feel boring (because its less socially acceptable to brag about how much a basic brokerage/401k goes up). But is incredibly effective long term.

But, one shouldn't compare themselves to the Joneses anyway. I didn't say anything about parents helping them out...or whatever.


Like I said I agree with the bulk of your post, but you made the tortoise and the hare comparison -- implying that those cryptobros and the like got out to a fast start and like to point out how fast they've accumulated wealth but the guys grinding away making sacrifices at their corporate job socking x% away every year will be the ones to finish the race first.

And I'm pointing out that if you're going to play the comparison game, you shouldn't assume the "hares" aren't going to finish the race first. Because many of them are -- in fact I'd say just from an overall wealth standpoint those hares (cryptobros, tech traders) will make up a far larger percentage of newly minted millionaires/multi-millionaires/whatever than the tortoises slogging away at their W-2 jobs.

To use another animal analogy -- there are a lot of different ways to skin a cat. Don't assume the guys doing it faster than you aren't also doing it better.

Be happy getting to where you want to get, don't try and cheapen others who are where they are.

Wasn't the discussion I was really wanting to have, but here we are.

Sure, in some cases the hare will wiin. But, in some cases, the hare will lose. The hares don't often tell you when they lose alot, or that their real estate value isn't going up as much. Etc. Etc.

This is a strange tangent.


I get your point and don't disagree... It was just a bad parable
Tex117
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Proposition Joe said:

Tex117 said:

Proposition Joe said:

Tex117 said:

Proposition Joe said:


You shouldn't compare yourself to the joneses.


The Joneses wasn't really my point. It was a description of a certain type of person (they tend to tell you how well their asset classes do) in certain asset classes and why boring can really feel boring (because its less socially acceptable to brag about how much a basic brokerage/401k goes up). But is incredibly effective long term.

But, one shouldn't compare themselves to the Joneses anyway. I didn't say anything about parents helping them out...or whatever.


Like I said I agree with the bulk of your post, but you made the tortoise and the hare comparison -- implying that those cryptobros and the like got out to a fast start and like to point out how fast they've accumulated wealth but the guys grinding away making sacrifices at their corporate job socking x% away every year will be the ones to finish the race first.

And I'm pointing out that if you're going to play the comparison game, you shouldn't assume the "hares" aren't going to finish the race first. Because many of them are -- in fact I'd say just from an overall wealth standpoint those hares (cryptobros, tech traders) will make up a far larger percentage of newly minted millionaires/multi-millionaires/whatever than the tortoises slogging away at their W-2 jobs.

To use another animal analogy -- there are a lot of different ways to skin a cat. Don't assume the guys doing it faster than you aren't also doing it better.

Be happy getting to where you want to get, don't try and cheapen others who are where they are.

Wasn't the discussion I was really wanting to have, but here we are.

Sure, in some cases the hare will wiin. But, in some cases, the hare will lose. The hares don't often tell you when they lose alot, or that their real estate value isn't going up as much. Etc. Etc.

This is a strange tangent.


I get your point and don't disagree... It was just a bad parable

The parable I still think is applicable. It just needs the amendment of "but sometimes, the hare will win....and maybe by alot." But there are also alot of dead hares. High Risk, High Reward.
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Texag5324 said:

TXTransplant said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Well once you hit critical mass in your retirement of around $500,000 that's when compounding really takes effect. You'll make much more or possibly lose in a down market but generally make more in just compounding than what you can contribute. I read your post and you said you have $2MM. So if you have to back off contributing for financial reasons you'll be fine. A 20% up market is 400k. I realize we could have a bear and you could lose (on paper ) a lot but just stay the course it will go up over time.


That's helpful, too. Worst case scenario would be I have to stop contributing completely for some period of time. If that happened, I would also lose my pension (which will prob contribute somewhere in the 400-500k range, if I retire at 55).

401k, Roth, and IRA are right around 1.4MM. Of those 3, the only account I'm actively adding to is the 401k. The other 2 are growth only.

I have a really great FA, but we actually haven't discussed worst case scenario.

One thing you could do to give yourself an immediate raise is stop using a financial advisor and manage everything on your own. With your net worth, you are likely paying $10k+ a year for them to manage your finances. Thats hundreds of thousands of dollars in overall fees you're paying throughout your lifetime.

It depends on what they offer and if they beat the market net of fees. Some offer a lot of tax and estate planning advice that is or will be necessary and if they beat the market or even same as the market net of fees then it can be worth it. Each person needs to do the math and decide this for themselves.
When we were down, and we would come to Lubbock, you people would treat us like kings.-Paul Stanley of KISS
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgsMyDude said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.



Does a stupid person take advantage of a 1.95% loan on an 8-year-old used vehicle, and invest the rest in the market, as opposed to paying cash up front?

Asking for a friend

I get your point, but remember this isn't t a house that will go up in value over time. This is a rapidly depreciating asset and you need to include that in your calculus. Plus if it's 8 years old how expensive can it be? I'd just pay it off as quick as I could then drive it forever.
When we were down, and we would come to Lubbock, you people would treat us like kings.-Paul Stanley of KISS
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tex117 said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.

Good advice. I know for me, Im going to have a hard time following it (ie, forcing myself to spend it). There is a number I have in mind that when I hit it, I may be able to start loosening the reigns.

I have long surpassed the number I had in my 20's. But I have definitely loosened up in the last few years.
When we were down, and we would come to Lubbock, you people would treat us like kings.-Paul Stanley of KISS
BenTheGoodAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm not there yet, but will easily outpace where I was targeting in my 20's. To be fair, my life is different than I planned in my 20's too.

But back to your comment about the compounding effect of a $500,000 nest egg - not only does that larger nest egg start to do the heavy lifting in growing your portfolio, but it also starts relieving the pressure to perform and support your family on your income (or more accurately, the fear of failing to perform). At least it did for me. And with that pressure going down, I've felt a lot more at ease with loosening up.
AgsMyDude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

AgsMyDude said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.



Does a stupid person take advantage of a 1.95% loan on an 8-year-old used vehicle, and invest the rest in the market, as opposed to paying cash up front?

Asking for a friend

I get your point, but remember this isn't t a house that will go up in value over time. This is a rapidly depreciating asset and you need to include that in your calculus. Plus if it's 8 years old how expensive can it be? I'd just pay it off as quick as I could then drive it forever.


I understand what you are saying. Let's leave the 'drive it forever' piece because that's going to happen whether I finance it or not.

Let's use this Honda Accord, $20k, as an example, 39,500 miles. Ultra reliable

https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicle/756876742

Why pay $20k cash when financing @ 1.95 for 6 years is a whopping $1,006.62 in interest? Sure, it's depreciating, but HYSA will clear that interest alone (plus more)
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AgsMyDude said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

AgsMyDude said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.



Does a stupid person take advantage of a 1.95% loan on an 8-year-old used vehicle, and invest the rest in the market, as opposed to paying cash up front?

Asking for a friend

I get your point, but remember this isn't t a house that will go up in value over time. This is a rapidly depreciating asset and you need to include that in your calculus. Plus if it's 8 years old how expensive can it be? I'd just pay it off as quick as I could then drive it forever.


I understand what you are saying. Let's leave the 'drive it forever' piece because that's going to happen whether I finance it or not.

Let's use this Honda Accord, $20k, as an example, 39,500 miles. Ultra reliable

https://www.autotrader.com/cars-for-sale/vehicle/756876742

Why pay $20k cash when financing @ 1.95 for 6 years is a whopping $1,006.62 in interest? Sure, it's depreciating, but HYSA will clear that interest alone (plus more)

I suppose if you're super meticulous then yeah ok, but I just don't want that hassle. I have had car payments in my youth but paid them off as quickly as I could while building up cash to just pay for them in the future. A lot of people just finance cars and roll negative equity into their next purchase, totally get that you're not doing that.
When we were down, and we would come to Lubbock, you people would treat us like kings.-Paul Stanley of KISS
Dr T and the Women
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You can get an asset based loan without a FA.

I am in the private bank at JPM and self manage.

All the big banks will lend against your portfolio
No material on this site is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. See full Medical Disclaimer.
Irwin M. Fletcher
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenTheGoodAg said:

I'm not there yet, but will easily outpace where I was targeting in my 20's. To be fair, my life is different than I planned in my 20's too.

But back to your comment about the compounding effect of a $500,000 nest egg - not only does that larger nest egg start to do the heavy lifting in growing your portfolio, but it also starts relieving the pressure to perform and support your family on your income (or more accurately, the fear of failing to perform). At least it did for me. And with that pressure going down, I've felt a lot more at ease with loosening up.

Yes you're totally right about the wealth effect it has and feeling better about spending a little more on things you wouldn't have in the past, but that's why you do it on the first place for the independence factor. To me it has been well worth what I didn't or wouldn't pay for in my 20's and 30's.
When we were down, and we would come to Lubbock, you people would treat us like kings.-Paul Stanley of KISS
DickWhitman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

TXTransplant said:

Question: I realize this is anecdotal, and every situation will be different but that's ok.

Once you reached the 1MM mark, how long did it take you to double that? And then double that again?

It's taken me 5 years to go from 1MM to 2 (2020-2025). I realize that there are tons of factors and variables in this, but I'm curious and just want to hear different experiences.

All answers are appreciated, but my specific situation is a corporate cube-dweller maxing out 401k, HSA, Roth, IRA, etc., as well as a modest personal investment account. No stock options, windfalls, or real estate sales. Home equity excluded from that number. I'm asking about growth of cash savings/investments.

I was 45 when hit $1million net. 50 when hit $2MM, 52 hit 3MM and just hit 4 and I'm 54 will be 55 in two mos.
I hit $1MM in 401k at 48. Then changed jobs and rolled that to IRA both regular and ROTH. Already had ROTH as well. Total retirement is right at $3MM in a little less than 7 years time.


$1MM - Age 33. Took 11 years.
$2MM - Age 35 1.5 years
$3MM - Age 37 1.5 years

2/3 is in various investment accounts, 1/3 in Real Estate (Primary residence plus 2 rentals)

A few big picture comments for context:

- Avoided student loans. Scholarships + working my way through school allowed me to start at $0 upon graduation
- Very diligent saver and started early. Started by maxing ROTH 401k match and ROTH IRA. Then was fully maxing 401k contributions limits ~3 years out of school.
- Avoided bad debt
- Purchased a home ~9 months after graduation (now a rental)
- Benefited by bull runs of post 08 financial crisis, COVID, etc. Never stopped investing.
- Majority of investments have been low cost index funds. Set it and forget it style.
- The last couple years I've benefited from a few "riskier" investments. Crypto ($25k > $150k, sold ~$25k to fund a Real Estate project that net ~$100k in profit), Real Estate construction projects. These were "fun" projects where I was willing to lose what I put in but have paid off.

Income - Started career on the corporate side. I'd say middle to upper middle total comp for people in my peer group but was underpaid to my performance. Never hit the top tier of my friends Petroleum Engineering or the Tech start up world.

Moved over to smaller firms where my comp could be more closely tied to performance, which has paid off well. Including an equity stake in my current company that will like exit in the next 3-5 years. Not including this in any plans but could be a nice payday.

My wife moved into tech sales and saw her income grow exponentially. We've had a very nice ~5 year High DINK run recently that has accelerated things.

We balance each other well on the "maximize savings" vs "maximize experiences" trade off. I would say we optimize our frugality to align to what we value.

Drove used Hondas for 10 years, cook at home during the week, use points for travel but gladly spend $300 on a nice dinner and have A&M season tickets.

We've inflated our lifestyle a bit (no longer drive Hondas but aren't driving BMWs either) and saved a little less than we could have but happy with where we are.

Next goal is $5MM Net Worth by 40.

We just had our first kid 3 days ago so we'll see if we get there. Lucky kid was born a millionaire
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dr T and the Women said:

You can get an asset based loan without a FA.

I am in the private bank at JPM and self manage.

All the big banks will lend against your portfolio

Agreed. You can get margin at any brokerage.
Pro College Station Convention Center
62strat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Irwin M. Fletcher said:

AgsMyDude said:

Irwin M. Fletcher said:

Tex117 said:

The boring way really is THE WAY.

Its definitely hard to do it this way as it is well...boring. CryptoBros, tech traders, and all of that are super flashy and happily yell to the world how much crypto has gone up. Real Estate people also have absolutely zero issue with telling the world how much zillow thinks their property has increased.

It always feels like everyone is making more money doing the flashy stuff than you because...they are telling you. (I think its tacky to talk about money in general, but for whatever reason, these investment classes, people talk about and is somewhat socially acceptable).

Then there are is the boring way. For whatever reason, its viewed more tacky to just say "yeah, my investment accounts are well over a million, and its not uncommon to make 20-30k in a day (or lose it for that matter)." That same person bragging about their crypto or real estate then, immediately, gets all scuffy.

Also, the boring way takes awhile to get going. Getting to that first million is a slog. There are alot of sacrifices to be made at a time in life when lots of others are really going HAM on spending (young families). But then, almost like when you wake up and find yourself old (you aren't that old, probably early 40s), you are a millionaire...where your money is going to make money for you and you will retire a multi-millionaire sometime in your 50s.

Its a classic tortoise and the hare.



Agree with this. One thing I'll also say is a lot of people on this thread have talked about wanting to enjoy life and not worried about how much they accumulate. I'm 54, and I lived below my means but we still enjoyed vacations and doing a lot of things. Even able to send my kids to private school. I also have had season tickets to A&M games for 15 years with my good friends. My wife even drove a Lexus but I bought it used and never had debt on a car. Had a very reasonable mortgage. I'll just say this I agree everyone is different and I really enjoy just saving and investing, like Warren Buffett does. Just watching it grow. Others want other things and that's great, but if you aren't putting at least 15% of your income in retirement or investments and don't have at least three months of expenses in cash and you're going out to eat or making car payments on a depreciating asset you are a stupid person period. This is not an opinion, it just is. At least do 15% and 3 months, after that do what makes you happy.



Does a stupid person take advantage of a 1.95% loan on an 8-year-old used vehicle, and invest the rest in the market, as opposed to paying cash up front?

Asking for a friend

I get your point, but remember this isn't t a house that will go up in value over time. This is a rapidly depreciating asset and you need to include that in your calculus. Plus if it's 8 years old how expensive can it be? I'd just pay it off as quick as I could then drive it forever.

just to jump on this bandwagon.. but this is silly. Whether you're making payments on the car you currently own, or you own the car and are instead making 'payments' towards an account for the future car you buy in cash.. what difference does it make? a low interest rate does not amount to much.

I got 0% on my new F150.. no one in their right mind would not carry that payment out. I did 6 years. 2 years left, hopefully I'll have car 8-10.
SnowboardAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just heard DR (not that I listen to him) say that no more than 50% of your annual income should be in cars / wheels. He said millionaires are even more conservative than that.
bagger05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SnowboardAg said:

Just heard DR (not that I listen to him) say that no more than 50% of your annual income should be in cars / wheels. He said millionaires are even more conservative than that.

I assume we are talking about asset value of the vehicles over annual income?

Probably not a bad rule of thumb. If you're making $50k per year having a $25k car. Seems reasonable.
SnowboardAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bagger05 said:


I assume we are talking about asset value of the vehicles over annual income?.


Sorry, he was referring to asset purchase price. Example: guy was making $80k and his daily driver cost him $13k. He wanted a $30k fun weekend toy, and DR said not advisable given that the PP of both exceeded 50%.

What I found interesting was that covers all wheels: RVs, boats, motorcycles, golf carts, etc. I typically lean very conservative financially so I would say that 50% is on salary only and not bonus, equity, etc.
62strat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bagger05 said:

SnowboardAg said:

Just heard DR (not that I listen to him) say that no more than 50% of your annual income should be in cars / wheels. He said millionaires are even more conservative than that.

I assume we are talking about asset value of the vehicles over annual income?

Probably not a bad rule of thumb. If you're making $50k per year having a $25k car. Seems reasonable.


This gets skewed as you make more though and have more discretionary income. Also; totally dependent on your mortgage.

A household with $50k has very little discretionary income. A hh with $150k has a lot. They have the option to spend more on the car and less on expensive dinners, vacations, hobbies, furniture, etc… all things that the $50k hh doesn't even have the option to do.

Then there is mortgage which can vary wildly. our mortgage is 2.5% and we bought 13 years ago; so our payment is less than rent for a 2br apt near us.
Case in point, we have roughly $2k-$3k more a month left over compared to a neighbor with the same income but purchased in the last 4 years, but we of course have less than someone with a paid off house.
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I dont want to think about my wheels total. I paid cash for them all but it would be a scary sight. 2 Harleys, F350, flatbed trailer, 5th Wheel and side by side. I might give DR a heart attack.
Thunderstruck xx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
With the 50% rule I could have two very nice luxury cars, but I hate dumping so much money into depreciating assets. They're like handcuffs to becoming financially independent.

I still drive a 15 year old car with 150k miles on it.
LMCane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hoyt Ag said:

I dont want to think about my wheels total. I paid cash for them all but it would be a scary sight. 2 Harleys, F350, flatbed trailer, 5th Wheel and side by side. I might give DR a heart attack.


what's your net worth (not including your home)?

I see a ton of people in Maryland with F350s living in near trailer parks.
bagger05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Always been glad that cars aren't my thing.

If I had stupid levels of money I'd go nuts on a restomod pickup but thankfully I'm not afflicted with being any kind of a gear head or car guy or whatever.

I'd find other stupid ways to spend money.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Same. Grateful that cars are just a tool to me. I have a brother who has always overextended himself (on lots of things) but has always driven nice new trucks that I knew he couldn't truly afford. But oh well…

A Porsche 911 is my only dream car but I am totally fine that I'll probably never have one. If I do it will be when I feel beyond 100% FI and even then I'll try to find a deal on a used one.
Hoyt Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LMCane said:

Hoyt Ag said:

I dont want to think about my wheels total. I paid cash for them all but it would be a scary sight. 2 Harleys, F350, flatbed trailer, 5th Wheel and side by side. I might give DR a heart attack.


what's your net worth (not including your home)?

I see a ton of people in Maryland with F350s living in near trailer parks.

Double comma club at 40yo, 42 now. I'm not Texags rich, but I am doing okay. the 5th wheel is actually sold to my brother and will be a relief to get rid of in a few weeks. He made the wise decision to go to welding school and got a job pipelining so he needed a place on wheels. Win for us both.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.