MSTY has jumped around in price this month from the 20-22 range. It has long stopped the massive declines, although it rode up to an ATH of 46.50 last year before falling back down to earth. It's all time low was 17 something during the height of tariff fearmongering. So, 20 or thereabouts seems to be a stable price, at least for now.
SMCY has an ATH of 59.20, which it will probably never see again. It suffered the downward slide like so many of these high payers do, but it too seems to like $20. Last month it's been hanging out between $20.xx and $18.xx. Alas, my average is around $20.15, and it feels like on most days it shows red in my account. However, these are held as money producers, not value increasing assets, so I live with the semi-permanent red without complaint.
ULTY still hangs around $6, where it has since the change in its approach back in Feb. Before then it was steadily going down. During the dustup in April it hit its ATL of $5.23, but quickly went back up into the 6's and has stayed there for the most part, ever since.
With Juneteenth the weekly payout for ULTY that week was delayed, resulting in two distributions this week on Monday and Friday. The same thing is slated to occur the week of July 4.
Speaking of double payouts, the YieldMax funds pay every four weeks, as opposed to on a particular day of the month. Since 52/4=13, it means their funds will find a month somewhere to offer a double payment in. For Group D, which is where MSTY and SMCY are, August is the month so that's nice.
A lot of people pay much attention to that distribution schedule of A,B,C and D groups and buy in to funds from each so they get a payout every week. But with the mad success of ULTY since they went to weekly distributions, I think more money has shifted over to weekly payers.
ULTY remains my favorite, and it's gaining in popularity. The big thing is its NAV decay has pretty much halted since they changed their prospectus and went to weekly payouts. Even more important, instead of focusing on one single company and writing options on it, they hold a variety of stocks to play with. When one stops being volatile or otherwise becomes less profitable to write covered calls on, they'll sell it and buy a different stock. This has resulted in steady payouts hovering around 9 cents/share every week for a while now.
Other ETF companies are paying attention to the weekly distributions and how investors might approach buying their product or not. Roundhill recently announced they would rearrange payouts on their weeklies so that investors could get income every day of the week, much like YMax set things up with their four groups of monthly producers on alternate weeks so people could get paid every week. I hear that some daily payers are in the wings as well, but I can't imagine the income would be that great on those. In my thinking, a weekly payer is good enough.
Also, IMO some competing companies with the YieldMax funds seem to have learned the wrong lesson from ULTY's success. They seem to focus on the fact ULTY's NAV stopped declining after shifting to a weekly payout. But the mixed basket of funds it can pick and choose for options is really more responsible for that, I think. For instance, they hold/held HIMS. After it dropped recently, ULTY's NAV barely blipped because it was a small percentage of their overall holdings. Single stock funds are not so agile. They will decline precipitously on a drop from the underlying, then struggle mightily to regain NAV because the options limit their upside.
On the other hand, buying and selling by investors does not affect their price much. When more people buy, they increase the number of shares available to purchase, and reduce them when people leave the fund. So the price of single-stock options funds are tied to their underlying more heavily, especially on drops. It helps when the underlying soars in price, but gains are capped for the ETF because they're playing options.
So to recap for my holdings: I'm happy with my current shares of MSTY and SMCY. Not adding more, not selling any. And I am looking forward to the double payout in August. I continue to add shares of ULTY, watching for dips below $6.20, which is about where my current average is.
ETFs I'm watching: I'm keeping an eye on YETH, which is one of those funds switching to weekly payouts in July, along with its sister fund YBTC. Both are Roundhill products and produce distributions from Ether and Bitcoin, respectively. YETH paid out over $2/share per month since conception last year except in November. Since the start of this year, except for January when they had a big $3.85/share payout, distributions have ranged from $1.08 to 1.89 per month. YBTC is too expensive for me. I'm afraid NAV decay may hit it, even after going weekly. As mentioned, I don't think paying weekly is the special sauce that prevents NAV decay. But YETH is very interesting and I'm keeping an eye on it.
I'm also watching TSYY, a GraniteShares "YieldBoost" product. It's a weekly payer now, as of this summer. It always paid out a decent monthly distribution, and I've been watching to see if the overall amount stayed the same. So far it has, paying about 30 cents a week. What makes it so interesting is it's really cheap at the moment, hovering in the $10/share range. And 1000 shares would bring in somewhere around $300/week.
The risk is that it's still new, and it's changed only recently to weekly, like in the last month. So it could all go belly up, lose value, begin paying a lot less, etc. Also, it is writing options on a single underlying stock, a practice which as mentioned is starting to lose popularity. And, TSLA is not necessarily the high-flyer it once was.
Having said all that, the underlying is not super-important with these things, the volatility of the underlying is, and TSLA remains fairly volatile. Anyway, it's worth watching.
I'm also watching USOY, a Defiance product. I mentioned this one in a previous post. It holds Treasuries but is focused on writing options on oil. It's been hovering in the $10 range since April, paying .50-.80/month, nothing exciting. But like TSYY, it jumped on the weekly payout bandwagon, their first one coming in last week at just under 15 cents. Not yet convinced to buy, but watching closely.
Finally, I'm still watching MRNY which has MRNA as the underlying. The sentiment here seems to be people are watching to see if MRNA can finally make a comeback and regain momentum. Meanwhile MRNY remains in the sub-$3 range, and it's been there a long time. This month it paid a 19 cent distribution, up from its more usual 12, making holders rejoice, I'm sure.
Pro College Station Convention Center