Great. Worst nightmare, the tards and the sips for the championship game. Wow.
*** 2026 Aggie Softball Season Thread ***
195,935 Views |
1179 Replies |
Last: 10 hrs ago by Danny Vermin
Dark_Knight said:
Great. Worst nightmare, the tards and the sips for the championship game. Wow.
Good pitching wins in softball. You gotta have it. And if you don't, you gotta commit NIL to go get it.
I didn't know softball was so popular. Tech is becoming a brand for sure and is about to get a ton of publicity for the tu beef. They are all over my feeds.
Credit to Tech. It is the best team money can buy. Hoping they both lose
Which pretty much benefits most good college teams. Please don't tell me you think those blue bloods won just bc they worked harder than others.
Gig ‘Em Baby!
I think it's ok to still cheer for some teams that aren't fully mercenary.
If that is the case, Texas is who everyone needs to win again. Tech has completely bought their team while Texas best players are mostly Whites recruites. Altmeyer is really the only one who is a starter and she is a grad transfer. Tech winning is bad for softball.
#FJB
mvegas said:
Credit to Tech. It is the best team money can buy. Hoping they both lose
Not even close...
2026 NCAA softball
— Wes_84’ 🌵 (@JBMT_REAL) June 1, 2026
Oklahoma: $7,724358
Tennessee: $5,807,620
Nebraska: $4,631,302
aggheees: $4,490,934
Florida: $4,481,513
Clemson: $4,313,465
Washington: $4,296,701
Texas: $4,048,926
....Texas Tech: $3,772,933
All their best players were bought. They have very few who were recruited and signed out of high school unlike Texas. Most of those schools paid their own players who earned NIL for performance.
#FJB
I have a hard time believing that A&M spent over 4 million on softball players.
That list is just "school spending" - scholarships, room/board, academic services, nutrition, training, coaching salaries, travel, equipment, facility maintenance, marketing/promotions, you can even have some facility depreciation, etc. None of that number is NIL. Every school includes and excludes different things, so the numbers are generally not particularly comparable between schools.
I didn't see this live yesterday. The Alabama leftfielder, Audrey Vandagriff, is getting a lot of criticism for her effort on what became the game deciding play in game 1 yesterday.
I'm shocked Vandagriff didn't jump to try to catch this. https://t.co/n4hXEnYNRW
— Molly Keshin (@mollykeshin) June 2, 2026
Audrey Vandagriff cost Murphy his second title
— ManILoveFootball (@big12sucks9) June 2, 2026
tu and tech have the best combination of pitching and hitting. UCLA had the hitting but only one pitcher. Tennessee had the pitching but didn't have the hitters. Alabama had a good combination but could beat Tech.
Gap said:
I didn't see this live yesterday. The Alabama leftfielder, Audrey Vandagriff, is getting a lot of criticism for her effort on what became the game deciding play in game 1 yesterday.I'm shocked Vandagriff didn't jump to try to catch this. https://t.co/n4hXEnYNRW
— Molly Keshin (@mollykeshin) June 2, 2026Audrey Vandagriff cost Murphy his second title
— ManILoveFootball (@big12sucks9) June 2, 2026
It was interesting hearing the response, both at the time of the play and throughout the evening, from the announcers when discussing the play. I'm not sure I"ve ever heard announcers of a female sport go so hard against an athlete. Guess Title IX finally caught up in the booth.
She certainly could have made a stronger jump, but playing the ball and fence in an unfamiliar stadium has certainly led to plays like this in the past.
I'd say that's not characteristic of Alabama softball if you've watched them play under Murphy.
Dark_Knight said:
Great. Worst nightmare, the tards and the sips for the championship game. Wow.
You've been in nightmare zone a while, bud...
Go outside! Make a new friend! Pet a random dog!
Just heard in an interview with Torie that Jordy was playing at 3 months pregnant. What a dawg!
MSTC Man said:
tu and tech have the best combination of pitching and hitting. UCLA had the hitting but only one pitcher. Tennessee had the pitching but didn't have the hitters. Alabama had a good combination but could beat Tech.
Because Tech stole UCLA's other star pitcher (Terry - 41 games won for the Bruins her first 2 years) to pair with the one they poached from Stanford. Terry also accounted for the winning run against her former team.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2026-05-31/ucla-softball-eliminated-texas-tech-womens-college-world-series
Faustus said:MSTC Man said:
tu and tech have the best combination of pitching and hitting. UCLA had the hitting but only one pitcher. Tennessee had the pitching but didn't have the hitters. Alabama had a good combination but could beat Tech.
Because Tech stole UCLA's other star pitcher (Terry - 41 games won for the Bruins her first 2 years) to pair with the one they poached from Stanford. Terry also accounted for the winning run against her former team.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2026-05-31/ucla-softball-eliminated-texas-tech-womens-college-world-series
So Tech was smart and used their funds and current ncaa processes to their advantage….
Got it
Gap said:
That list is just "school spending" - scholarships, room/board, academic services, nutrition, training, coaching salaries, travel, equipment, facility maintenance, marketing/promotions, you can even have some facility depreciation, etc. None of that number is NIL. Every school includes and excludes different things, so the numbers are generally not particularly comparable between schools.
Correct, except it might also contain the school-supported NIL $ which will be pretty small for softball. Each school is allowed $20.5M direct to athletes across all sports, A&M is supporting six sports with this.
NIL from Texas Aggies United, Matador Club, etc. are NOT in those numbers. This is where majority of athlete $ comes from.
Raiderjay said:Faustus said:MSTC Man said:
tu and tech have the best combination of pitching and hitting. UCLA had the hitting but only one pitcher. Tennessee had the pitching but didn't have the hitters. Alabama had a good combination but could beat Tech.
Because Tech stole UCLA's other star pitcher (Terry - 41 games won for the Bruins her first 2 years) to pair with the one they poached from Stanford. Terry also accounted for the winning run against her former team.
https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2026-05-31/ucla-softball-eliminated-texas-tech-womens-college-world-series
So Tech was smart and used their funds and current ncaa processes to their advantage….
Got it
Doesn't bother me as a Texas fan.
After always getting stomped by OU breaking through last year was a blast. I wouldn't be too upset if Texas ended up returning the favor.
KLB93 said:Gap said:
That list is just "school spending" - scholarships, room/board, academic services, nutrition, training, coaching salaries, travel, equipment, facility maintenance, marketing/promotions, you can even have some facility depreciation, etc. None of that number is NIL. Every school includes and excludes different things, so the numbers are generally not particularly comparable between schools.
Correct, except it might also contain the school-supported NIL $ which will be pretty small for softball. Each school is allowed $20.5M direct to athletes across all sports, A&M is supporting six sports with this.
NIL from Texas Aggies United, Matador Club, etc. are NOT in those numbers. This is where majority of athlete $ comes from.
Good add. Thanks.
The rough expected breakdown is:
Football 75%
MBB 15%
Other four sports (Baseball, WBB, VB, Softball) 10%
So, if those 4 sports were splitting the 10% equally (which is probably high for softball), that would be roughly $500,000 for softball.
Remember the 1st 2.5 million of that cap goes to the additional scholarships. So only 18 mil goes toward rev share to players.
Trev never exactly what the split was but I would suspect the softball share is closer to 1% and the baseball share closer to 5%
Trev never exactly what the split was but I would suspect the softball share is closer to 1% and the baseball share closer to 5%
Trish made a comment around HS signing day that they are competitive with NIL. IIRC, it sounded like this was a new thing. Also, it didn't sound like we had the budget to outbid other programs, but we could be competitive enough so that money wasn't the deciding factor.
Not sure how that will extend into the portal budget.
Not sure how that will extend into the portal budget.
It's why High School recruiting is so important in a sport that doesn't have unlimited money for NIL. It's why the Horns will be in the mix for the foreseeable future. They have Kavan again next year, the True Freshman Wells who's already seen action and they already have the number 1 pitching recruit from 2024 that transferred from OU but couldn't play til next season. You have to hit on high school players especially pitchers.
#FJB
Featured Stories
See All
5:34
16h ago
5.3k
10:06
14h ago
2.4k
12:26
12h ago
1.4k
Unbeaten Pérez led the Ags back to the national title
by Kay Naegeli
An improved Reed likely equates to an improved A&M
by Olin Buchanan
5 offseason storylines to follow for Aggie baseball
by Richard Zane
Infection_Ag11
Elko is set to land around 20% of the nation's top 50 composite players
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
17
Infection_Ag11
Elko is set to land around 20% of the nation's top 50 composite players
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
MeesterKyle
The Film Guy Network watches tape and comments on some 2027 commits
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
8
Ag87H2O
The Film Guy Network watches tape and comments on some 2027 commits
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
6
Aggie09Derek
Jaiden Bryant Flipped his Commitment from LSU to Miami
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
5
Infection_Ag11
Elko is set to land around 20% of the nation's top 50 composite players
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
4
T-shirt-Ag
Jaiden Bryant Flipped his Commitment from LSU to Miami
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
4