Colbert cancelled

31,299 Views | 587 Replies | Last: 17 days ago by captkirk
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That never happened.

It's a big fat lie.

You can see my answer above that proves it is a lie.

HTHs.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I realize that John Oliver has zero credibility among a number of posters here, is nothing more than a liberal shill, etc, etc, but he absolutely brings the receipts in the segment below, re: Trump's suing of Paramount/CBS/60 Minutes, showing just how stupid and unjustified the whole thing was, to rgvag11's point. It starts around the 13:44 mark, but the whole thing is worth watching...

DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes, let's go to John Oliver for the impartial breakdown
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Also thanks to rgvag11 for providing the correct context and summing up the correct order of events, so I didn't have to.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

Yes, let's go to John Oliver for the impartial breakdown

I knew this would be the response. So predictable. But I dare you to actually watch, because the evidence he presents is inarguable.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So predictable because you know it's true. He's the cable version of these guys
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh, look, just days after their meeting with Carr, and Colbert being fired, Skydance publicly declaring that they're going to do yet another thing that will just so happen to make the president happy. What are the odds!


(again, for the record, I'm all for this, I'm simply pointing to yet another "coincidence" in an increasingly long line of "coincidences")
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

So predictable because you know it's true. He's the cable version of these guys

Just watch the clip and actually debate the substance of his argument instead of immediately resorting to the most cliched reaction possible. Is it really that hard?
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I told you exactly what they did. She meandered, muddled, and rambled and they carved it into coherent responses. That is 100% true.

Cliche lol. He's a hack. Truth.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The fact that you refuse to even engage/watch tells me everything I need to know about how sincere you are. Much appreciated.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

Oh, look, just days after their meeting with Carr, and Colbert being fired, Skydance publicly declaring that they're going to do yet another thing that will just so happen to make the president happy. What are the odds!


(again, for the record, I'm all for this, I'm simply pointing to yet another "coincidence" in an increasingly long line of "coincidences)
eliminating DEI has been his public policy since he got reelected. This should not come as a surprise.
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So she didn't meander and ramble? Gonna deny that? Yes, you are a beacon of sincerity lol.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But ya ain't mad that Fox News altered the subsistence of Trump's answer to make people think he would release the Epstein files. LOL
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump rambles. I don't watch FoxNews, but if they did some deceitful editing, maybe Kamala should sue. But I'm not the one with the tinfoil saying Colbert not getting renewed is some conspiracy
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bam02 said:

TCTTS said:

Oh, look, just days after their meeting with Carr, and Colbert being fired, Skydance publicly declaring that they're going to do yet another thing that will just so happen to make the president happy. What are the odds!


(again, for the record, I'm all for this, I'm simply pointing to yet another "coincidence" in an increasingly long line of "coincidences)

eliminating DEI has been his public policy since he got reelected. This should not come as a surprise.

Correct. That's not in dispute. Rather, it's the timing of Skydance's public announcement of their adherence.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DannyDuberstein said:

So she didn't meander and ramble? Gonna deny that? Yes, you are a beacon of sincerity lol.

Of course she did. It's the double standard that Oliver presents that's the key. And of course the fact that no serious attorney would argue that Trump had any chance in hell at winning. The suit, rather, was a way to gum up the Skydance deal, as a means to ultimately get Paramount to kiss the ring/capitulate. Same as with ABC, Meta, what Trump is now trying to do with Fox News, etc, etc.
Equinox
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why is Trump letting Colbert stay for 10 more months? If he can insist on Colbert getting 86'd he can surely bypass any contract. Trump can do anything!
DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump has getting rammed 5 nights a week on Colbert for 10 years and this guy is talking about double standards
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump isn't "letting" anything happen, nor was this likely any kind of official request. This has all been discussed ad nauseam.
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Still not debating the actual substance of the argument, I see. Again, extremely telling.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?

DannyDuberstein
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I've already made my points. They massively cleaned up her answers when one of the public's main concerns about her is that she is a dummy (and the unedited version makes her look like a dummy)- true. There is nothing unusual about how long this merger is taking - true. I have more M&A experience in my little finger than John Oliver has on his staff - true.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drewser95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

That never happened.

It's a big fat lie.

You can see my answer above that proves it is a lie.

HTHs.


If that's the case, then I sincerely apologize for my earlier snarky response. This was the blurb that I (and possibly the poster I quoted) was going off of:

Quote:

FCC chair Brendan Carr ordered CBS News to hand over the unedited transcript as part of its investigation into whether the network violated the FCC's "news distortion" policy after a complaint was filed.

"The policy says you can't swap answers out to make it look like somebody said something entirely different," Carr told Fox News' Dana Perino on Monday, later adding it would have been "fine" if it was edited for length and clarity.

Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretending to know everything about a particular industry because you have special insider status is a staple of this place.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.
rgvag11
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No problem.

I think you and I can both agree that Megan Kelly would have mentioned CBS was 'swapping answers' if it had occurred.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Gallo Blanco said:

DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.


I'm guessing you refuse to believe anything that doesn't support what you already think.
maroon barchetta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sapper Redux said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.


I'm guessing you refuse to believe anything that doesn't support what you already think.


I don't think he's a liberal.
Sapper Redux
How long do you want to ignore this user?
maroon barchetta said:

Sapper Redux said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.


I'm guessing you refuse to believe anything that doesn't support what you already think.


I don't think he's a liberal.


lol. Sure.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We really need two threads for this event to preserve Texags peace

-Colbert is getting cosmic justice and it's hilarious
-Orange Man is silencing us and we must cope
Teslag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sapper Redux said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.


I'm guessing you refuse to believe anything that doesn't support what you already think.


Based on your politics posting history it's amazing you can post this with no self awareness.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rgvag11 said:

JCA1 said:

rgvag11 said:

Stupe said:

Let me see if I have this correct.

CBS is owned by Paramount

CBS was obviously one-sided during the VP debates
CBS edited an interview...or should we just called it a political advertisement...with Kamala Harris
CBS gets sued
CBS loses lawsuit
CBS has a host on Late Night that has consistently bad-mouthed Trump and people that voted for him
CBS has a show that is losing money.....a LOT of money
Paramount cancels show that has alienated more than half of the country and is losing viewers and advertising revenue


It's Trump's fault.

Does that sum it up?



Not really.

The Redstone family has a 77% interest in Paramount Global.

The Redstone family wants to sellout to Skydance Media and make $2.25 billion.

The Trump administration has to approve the deal or things get real complicated.

Trump sues CBS over a case that every atty with a brain knows CBS can win.

The Redstone family capitulates to Trump for $36 million, and perhaps the firing of media personality he despises.

That about sums it up.


FWIW, almost all broadcast TV interviews are edited and CBS aired the entire interview, in pieces -- the part that was cut out of the evening broadcast was in the morning's teaser. Fox News, OTOH, did not air Trump's full answer to whether he would release the Epstein files.


That's not what 60 minutes was accused of. They didn't just condense/"snippit" the interview. They took answers from other questions and cut and paste them into other places when the answers Kamala gave were non-sensical. A media company lying to the public by flagrantly altering a politician's answers in an interview (whether for good or bad) should piss off anyone. Really says where we're at that there's disagreement on this. And if foxnews monkeyed with a Trump transcript like this, I'd feel the same way.


That's a flat out lie.

ETA: Fox News did 'monkey' with a Trump interview not airing his full answer about releasing the Epstein Files.



I see this as supporting Trump's stance on this. Before he was even elected he was saying that he would hesitate to release the files because anyone who is named in the files could have their lives ruined, regardless of context.

Who knows why Fox edited it that way. Did it actually air as the edited version? Or was that a teaser promo?

Either way, this is materially different than editing. A candidates answer to try to make her look less of an imbecile.
Stupe
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
Sapper Redux said:

El Gallo Blanco said:

DannyDuberstein said:

They turned her from complete rambling, meandering, blathering idiot to semi-coherent. Shady as hell regardless.

This. And they would NEVER EVER IN A MILLION YEARS, do Trump or ANY other republican a fraction of the same favors.

Same hyper biased left winged media that colluded with the FBI and Intel community to rig/influence the 2020 election and did not try to hide it. Would like to see anyone try to "debunk" this. It's fact, it happened.


I'm guessing you refuse to believe anything that doesn't support what you already think.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.