Colbert cancelled

31,390 Views | 587 Replies | Last: 19 days ago by captkirk
AggieEP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah, late night is dead for sure.

I used to watch Letterman and Conan because it was a fairly effective way to recap the news (lightheartedly sometimes... and sometimes very seriously) and get a general sense of the pulse of American culture. Now I have all of that information on my phone instantaneously, so why am I going to invest my time at 1030 at night watching one of these shows?

The problem was exacerbated by the fact that the content creators just aren't very likable in the same sense that Letterman, Conan and Carson were. I could imagine drinking a beer at the bar with Conan and enjoying the crap out of that. It would be pure torture to sit at a bar and have Colbert lecture me.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

I think this was 100% political/part of the Trump settlement. At least that's what spurred it. However, Matt Belloni provided some pertinent additional context last night that probably made the decision a pretty easy one, if not a no-brainer, financially...





Just busting your chops, but losing 40 mill/year isn't worth 1%? Gotta be 100% political?
Quad Dog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The answer is in that quote. If money mattered most (it definitely matters some) they would have taken other steps before cancellation.

"After all, when a network decides that a show is too expensive, executives typically go to the key talent and ask them to take pay cuts, fire people, or otherwise slash costs. That didn't happen here - though with Colbert said to be making between $15 million and $20 million per year, a pay cut wouldn't have solved the problem on its own."
TCTTS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"At least that's what spurred it."

I added that line specifically to clarify.

In other words, while, yes, I think the show would have been cancelled due to the financials regardless - sometime in, say, the next three years or so - the fact that it was cancelled NOW is 100% political. If Trump wasn't holding up the Skydance deal, the powers-that-be wouldn't have capitulated in this manner, when they did, as soon as they did. That's what I meant.
JCA1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TCTTS said:

"At least that's what spurred it."

I added that line specifically to clarify.

In other words, while, yes, I think the show would have been cancelled due to the financials regardless - sometime in, say, the next three years or so - the fact that it was cancelled NOW is 100% political. If Trump wasn't holding up the Skydance deal, the powers-that-be wouldn't have capitulated in this manner, when they did, as soon as they did. That's what I meant.


Like I led off, just busting your chops. It's all good.
beanbean
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AgGrad99 said:

I used to watch talk shows, and enjoyed them. But they are not entertaining anymore.

My ideas to save talk shows...

  • Have them on earlier. Get rid of the late news. We dont need so many hours of the news...we've already seen the stories on our phones throughout the day.
  • Don't try to be comedy shows. Funny mixed in is awesome, and if the host/show are naturally funny, so be it. But having comedians trying too hard to be funny, every night, usually isn't. Just have some good content and good interviews. I'd like to learn something about the guests, not just watch some pre-planned skit between them and host.
  • Stop being so formulaic. Mix up the schedule. Make the audience feel like they might miss something if they don't tune in the entire time. I understand there are production concerns, etc...but the exact same format, every night, year after year, gets old.


They tried that with Leno at 9pm and it was a disaster.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TCTTS said:

amg405 said:

Gotta be honest - whatever the Trump politics are… he and his writers aren't funny. And I used to love the Daily Show and to some extent Colbert Report.

If the ratings were good enough CBS finds a way. He's just not good anymore.


Yeah, every once in a while I'll catch an opening monologue from Colbert/Fallon/Kimmel and, man, they're just sooooo bad now (especially Fallon). Just utterly unfunny, regardless of politics. I think Colbert is a great interviewer, and I actually love Kimmel (which I know is unpopular around here), but by and large, the comedy on these late night talk shows has gotten so incredibly hacky that it's almost unbearable.

That, and as much as I hate Trump, even I admit that it's gotten pretty lame and off-putting how blatantly anti-right Colbert's and Kimmel's shows have become. Late night talk show hosts have made fun of sitting Presidents for as long as late night talk shows have existed, but it's just weird to see how one-sided and extreme these network institutions have so consistently become. To the point where, IMO, the whole format needs either a complete refresh of hosts - or just cancel the format altogether, at least for a while, then bring a couple of them back on streaming, with a fresh take, in a few years.


Yep, great post. Comedy almost always ceases to be funny when you can tell there's actual hatred in the air.

There are millions of people who don't love everything about Trump but just thought he was better for the country than the alternative. And for some reason, when we see these types of comics railing on him relentlessly and constantly over villainizing him, it starts to feel like they really don't like anyone who doesn't believe Trump is a full on demon-possessed-Hitler-monster.

It's just way too much and gets old quick. Esp when you can tell these guys all think a lot of us are (a) stupid, or (b) evil, or both.
BadMoonRisin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amg405 said:

Gotta be honest - whatever the Trump politics are… he and his writers aren't funny. And I used to love the Daily Show and to some extent Colbert Report.

If the ratings were good enough CBS finds a way. He's just not good anymore.

I noticed this in the SNL writers room as well during one of the documentary episodes of the anniversary.

The people in the writers room are so out of touch with reality, it's no wonder they cant make anything funny anymore.

Diversity of ideas is a requirement for comedy.
the most cool guy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nobody watches the show, and it's not funny or entertaining.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A dying format, really. The Leno generation is asleep by then, MIllennials and Gen Z would rather get their political hateslop scrolling on their phones. Only so much in ratings you can squeeze out of a portion of bitter Gen Xers.
El Gallo Blanco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cliff.Booth said:

A dying format, really. The Leno generation is asleep by then, MIllennials and Gen Z would rather get their political hateslop scrolling on their phones. Only so much in ratings you can squeeze out of a portion of bitter Gen Xers.


Colbert and his driver leaving the studio after the news…



AJ02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I honestly don't know a single person IRL that watches late night shows like that. Not my family, friends, or coworkers.

So who the heck DOES watch them??
superunknown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
My 2 cents...

It's a money thing and Paramount dgaf if people want to assume it's a political thing or sucking up to Trump. It's a very convenient red herring in this case. You can make the case like a lot of 16ers do (go woke go broke amirite?) and you can make the Reddit case of bully Trump and his billionaire buddy Ellison teaming up to squash liberal dissent. No matter which side you're on, you have a legitimate claim and the red v. blue wars can continue unabated.

I say it's all a red herring because linear media companies are turbo effed these days, largely because of the mountains and mountains of debt they're built on and simultaneously buried under.

The bottom line is the bottom line and always will be. Advertising agencies have 100% embraced streaming not because over half of video is watched online/on demand but because the cost is overwhelmingly in the advertiser's favor. Streaming ad rates are pennies on the dollar (for a lot of reasons) and instead of just paying linear rates on broadcast/OTA, they're demanding (and getting) reduced rates on broadcast/OTA because there's fewer and fewer eyes on linear.

Your NBCU/Disney/Paramounts of the world are sh**ing blood at this and have no idea how to handle it. Can't afford to tell an agency you won't take a lower rate because taking 70% of the money you got last year is better than taking 0%. The pinch comes in when the cost to acquire (or produce) quality programming is going up. I'm sure Colbert's contract when signed didn't seem like an anchor to Paramount. The disruption of the last 2 years (on the business side, not necessarily the content or innovative side) has been catastrophic across all linear broadcasting as the other non linear options (originally fueled by VC) have matured and actually become profitable or at least arent burning through money at the same rate they were.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AJ02 said:

I honestly don't know a single person IRL that watches late night shows like that. Not my family, friends, or coworkers.

So who the heck DOES watch them??


I seriously wonder how much of their total viewship is people who had it turned to one of the major networks for some other show and forgot to/were too lazy to turn it and fell asleep. Bet it's not an insignificant number.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Original Houston 1836
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pretty sure the network bosses tell them to talk politics. You think jiimmy Fallon knows anything about politics on his own? Carson had an empire. These guys work for just some other suit.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone that is shocked by this has not been paying attention for many years.

If Colbert was shocked by this, then that is just hubris on his part.

I've been sitting over here wondering when this was going to happen - not if.

The irony of people saying it's politics that got it killed miss the fact that it's politics that has kept the show on this long with blatant headwinds of no viewers and no money.
EclipseAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
In an era of diminishing viewership, being openly partisan was an easy way of securing a strong share of the available eyeballs. These late night guys don't have to be funny; their audiences just want to hear someone stick it to Trump.

Hell, they even invented a word for it -- "clapter."

20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's the same thing that happened to the soap opera industry. Every network had 3 of them that had been around for 50+ years as institutions. Once one pulled the plug, they all pulled the plug.
Cliff.Booth
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Urban Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
YouBet said:

Anyone that is shocked by this has not been paying attention for many years.

If Colbert was shocked by this, then that is just hubris on his part.

I've been sitting over here wondering when this was going to happen - not if.

The irony of people saying it's politics that got it killed miss the fact that it's politics that has kept the show on this long with blatant headwinds of no viewers and no money.

$40M annual gift to the DNC in the form of leftist propaganda masquerading as comedy. You are correct, pure politics.
Gigem314
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
EclipseAg said:

In an era of diminishing viewership, being openly partisan was an easy way of securing a strong share of the available eyeballs. These late night guys don't have to be funny; their audiences just want to hear someone stick it to Trump.

Hell, they even invented a word for it -- "clapter."


Looks like it did the opposite and cost them viewership.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The average age of a Colbert viewer is 68, which perhaps says more about CBS' audience than it does Colbert's, but it also makes it a bit tougher to imagine Colbert hustling viewers to "smash that like and subscribe button" on YouTube alongside MrBeast.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/stephen-colbert-late-show-ends-future-1236319676/

1000% believe that is accurate.
PatAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Feel like the simple truth is that the overall audience for late night talk shows is decreasing. As the older end of the population is dying off, the younger generations arent watching.
Has nothing to do with who is hosting the talk shows, they're just all watching youtube,tiktok, twitch and the like instead.
Cromagnum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
amg405 said:

Gotta be honest - whatever the Trump politics are… he and his writers aren't funny. And I used to love the Daily Show and to some extent Colbert Report.

If the ratings were good enough CBS finds a way. He's just not good anymore.


He was NEVER good.
Aust Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
20ag07 said:

Quote:

The average age of a Colbert viewer is 68, which perhaps says more about CBS' audience than it does Colbert's, but it also makes it a bit tougher to imagine Colbert hustling viewers to "smash that like and subscribe button" on YouTube alongside MrBeast.
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/tv/tv-news/stephen-colbert-late-show-ends-future-1236319676/

1000% believe that is accurate.


The avg 68 year old is up watching TV that late?! No freaking way.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PatAg said:

Feel like the simple truth is that the overall audience for late night talk shows is decreasing. As the older end of the population is dying off, the younger generations arent watching.
Has nothing to do with who is hosting the talk shows, they're just all watching youtube,tiktok, twitch and the like instead.


Absolutely a contributor. TV landscape is nothing like it used to be. Been discussed on here multiple times in the past. There are a million choices for your entertainment eyeballs these days - normal TV, on demand streaming, social media, gaming (now bigger than the movies), etc. And then having multiple different late night shows on network TV that are all clones of one another, that on top of that mimicry, have narrowed their audience to one side of the political aisle and there is no where to go but down.

I would believe the average age number from that article. Hell, I'm 51 and I haven't watched one of these shows in 25 years.
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
His crappy show was losing $40mm a year?!?!?! Holy crap what a joke Hollywood is.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You realize this is not "Hollywood", right?
bam02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Whatever. Television industry.
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I mean, Skydance is paying $8Billion for it. You win some, you lose some in this business.

The late night shows were printing money for decades until about 3 years ago. You don't instantly kill an institution on its first unprofitable year.

But now they're all going to get killed.
YouBet
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
20ag07 said:

I mean, Skydance is paying $8Billion for it. You win some, you lose some in this business.

The late night shows were printing money for decades until about 3 years ago. You don't instantly kill an institution on its first unprofitable year.

But now they're all going to get killed.


Gradually, then suddenly. You kill it when your net profit margin is -40% and the market has completely shifted away from you due to technological and cultural shifts in society. This is horse and buggy whip stuff here.

The trends for this format aren't going to improve. I hadn't even realized that CBS had already cancelled and not replaced another late night show that was airing after Colbert.
StinkyPinky
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Cliff.Booth said:

A dying format, really. The Leno generation is asleep by then, MIllennials and Gen Z would rather get their political hateslop scrolling on their phones. Only so much in ratings you can squeeze out of a portion of bitter Gen Xers.
This!
20ag07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kimmel is next. His contract is up in 2026. That show is not an institution-ABC wasn't even in the late night game until he came along.
TRD-Ferguson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm over 68. I haven't watched late night since Carson. But, yeah, usually in bed by 10 these days. If I am awake I'm watching YouTube.

Haven't watched regular TV in years. Typically stream stuff from various apps.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.