dermdoc said:
one MEEN Ag said:
There is a lot of to unpack here. Got to back way way up.
There are three tiers of nations in the OT in the era of Abraham/Isaac/Jacob.
-Israel
-Other Abrahamic people groups descendant from Abraham (Like the Edomites descendant from Esau)
-The table of nations that describe the rest of the known world and are pagan.
Israel was given the torah. The other abrahamic groups were not, but they were expected to not worship pagan gods and to worship YHWH. The oldest artifacts we have of YHWH's inscription is from edomites who worshiped God. To become an israelite you had to do the following:
-Be circumcised or be the wife or daughter of a circumcised male.
-Participate in the passover meal yearly.
Common derail point: This means that israelites are not a special ethnicity on their own based upon genetic differences, but reflections of marriage into the nation of Israel from outside. Israelites looked like the surrounding people groups because they came from them. Any 'jewish' ethnic genotypes that have arisen over time are because of inter faith marriages. But Israelites were not distinct initially. Based upon names in the bible, we know that Israel had at least one black egyptian high priest, (Phinaes, called the dark skinned one) and that Caleb was ethnically Canaanite. These are not possible under modern jewish distinctions of what genotypes make up jews as an ethnicity. They would be denied being called jewish ethnically even though they were full Israelites.
The Israelites were the last group to enter into Canaan and act as God's judgement. That is why you see God say do not take an inch of the land of the Edomites for they are your brothers and this land was given to them for driving out the giant clans in their lands.
Another common derail point: The book of Joshua declares that all the land gifted to Abraham and his descendants has been fulfilled. This is very important. It shows A) God presents a gift, humanity still has to take it and they have the autonomy to take it. (looking at you calvinists). This follows that B) Any unclaimed gifts of land from God as part of the covenant are not hanging chads. The israelites just did not fully take the gift and this period is now over. C) The whole covenant gift of land is the physical sign to seal the covenant that the messiah will come from Israel. It is the down payment on the messiah.
The twelve tribes of Israel split into two kingdoms, the 10 northern tribes were carried off by Assyria into the surrounding lands. The southern kingdom was exiled into Persia and then returned to rebuild the second temple.
The second temple does not have the presence of God. But it does have more devout people who are trying to uphold the torah. This is different than the era of the first temple. This brings in the messiah.
The messiah is a torah observant Israelite from Judah. Through using the Israel as the root, all of mankind can be grafted in. The 10 lost tribes of Israel are reconstituted through every man being able to be grafted in. Paul is basically the first person to catch on to this. Christians are not to become fully jewish torah observers because the torah is still in effect and christians cannot become jews except through marriage, circumcision and passover participation. And that the messianic age allows for Christians to be grafted in and live under the torah as foreigners. This is the counsel of jersualem. Christians are to follow the torah requirements of foreigners at the very least. No eating blood. No worshiping pagan gods, no participating in pagan sacrificial foods, no sexual immorality, no strangling animals as a means to kill them.
Jews who do not accept christ quickly demand that jews that do stop attending their synagogues and go found other houses of worship.
Fast forward 1900 years. The modern nation of Israel has no ties or prophecies left to the physical land or nation of Israel. They are LARPing under the name of Israel. The Scofield bible did an absolute number on evangelicals getting those purposefully confused. Modern evangelical devotion to Israel relies on weak understanding of church history and history of jews and christians post Jesus, and no church authority to correct this error.
It will die with boomers.
With all due respect, I ask you who you think Paul was talking about when he said all Israel will be saved? He had no knowledge of the church or theologians view on who Israel was. No knowledge of the nation state of Israel or the Holocaust.
To me, it seems painfully obvious when Paul says Israel he was talk of g about the Newish people. What else would he mean at that time in history with his Jewish background.
We will agree to disagree my friend.
At the time of Paul, the big question among the pharisees is how will the 12 tribes ever be reconstituted? That's the prophecy. But, the northern tribes are but dry bones (dead and gone). The assyrians took the northern tribes over 700 years from the time of Christ. The full nation of Israel is long long gone with no hope of tracking down descendants and trying to kickstart new tribes. 10 out of 12 tribes of Israel has been seasoned into the surrounding nations for a very long time. There are also israelites who stayed in babylon as well.
So getting the full twelve tribes of Israel band back together in one physical location is off the table.
The answer is that Israel will be saved through Christ. The lost tribes will be accounted for through the new branches grafted in. By gathering from all nations there will be descendants of missing tribes in them.
I wouldn't say he had no knowledge of the church - he is one of the first members of the church. And modern theologians view of Israel is an anachronism that puts modern christians superior to Paul's understanding who was there and is basically a prophet of the early church.
Paul is jewish, he is a Pharisee. There are tons of jews who are looking for the messiah and see Jesus as it. They form the early church. There is basically only a small remnant remaining anyway. Its Pharisees, Sadducees, and the Essenes.This is not Israel, but just a small remnant on its last stand.
To say that Paul thinks that a group 2000 years later than this remnant who explicitly rejected Christ as the messiah is somehow going to fully represent Israel is modern reading.
Also, the holocaust doesn't play into any of this. The Rothschilds could've set up shop in Minneapolis, called it new jerusalem and it would be the same. My sister in law goes to Antioch. She is not a member of the Antiochian Church.