Sid Farkas said:
for the umpteenth time itt: if there was a shred of evidence against Trump, it would've been leaked during his first term.
Maybe, that was my first thought too.
I dont think its possible to expose only Trump. This whole thing is so peculiarly bipartisan, it seems like there is a mutually assured destruction element on some level. There is also a victim confidentiality dynamic at play. Not sure an anonymous Jane Doe would fly in such an enormously high profile case.
*Not saying Trump did anything illegal. But none of us should be surprised if a NYC RE tycoon banged some Epstein peddled young adult escort in the 80s.
All this salacious nonsense is a big distraction that keeps people barking up the wrong tree.