DOJ: Epstein killed himself, no client list

225,894 Views | 3115 Replies | Last: 4 hrs ago by PaulsBunions
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:


So cut the **** on "I don't think he is necessarily blah blah" which more clearly means you so wish they find something on Trump.

You are just plain wrong. It would break my heart if Trump is caught up in the pedo aspect of the files.
Juan Lee Pettimore
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Keyno said:

flown-the-coop said:


So cut the **** on "I don't think he is necessarily blah blah" which more clearly means you so wish they find something on Trump.

You are just plain wrong. It would break my heart if Trump is caught up in the pedo aspect of the files.


You literally have nothing to worry about. Good Lord guys, this Epstein stupidity is over with.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anytime the narrative doesn't spin the lib way it becomes a Mossad coverup, Russian interference, CIA operation that would have shown Orange Man really is bad. Then all that fails they resort to the biblical Thy Name is Trump So Thy Be Most Guilty line.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Update on the Khanna/Massie HR
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Time for Massie to go ahead and make his DNC affiliation more formal.

Only reason he is doing this is to please Rand as Rand still wants things from Trump and is too ***** to do this himself.

See ya Massie.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Time for Massie to go ahead and make his DNC affiliation more formal.

Only reason he is doing this is to please Rand as Rand still wants things from Trump and is too ***** to do this himself.

See ya Massie.


Why? Trump told me its all a hoax so this will simply expose the dems and their lies. Seems like a win for DJT
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

Time for Massie to go ahead and make his DNC affiliation more formal.

Only reason he is doing this is to please Rand as Rand still wants things from Trump and is too ***** to do this himself.

See ya Massie.


Why? Trump told me its all a hoax so this will simply expose the dems and their lies. Seems like a win for DJT

Because there is other **** to be focused on and Massie just misses his name being out there. At least we know Ro is angling for a 2028 POTUS run, why is Massie so obsessed?

Really becomes a question of why there is ongoing attention here. Outside of tabloid obsessive and the get trump crowd, this story has moved on.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If the Epstein story has moved on as you say, why keep coming back to this thread? If the government isn't hiding information from us, whats wrong with forcing them to release what they have?
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

If the Epstein story has moved on as you say, why keep coming back to this thread? If the government isn't hiding information from us, whats wrong with forcing them to release what they have?

To make fun of the people who simply cannot move on.

And I have always supported the release of every single bit of information, completely unredacted.

Weren't we getting a press conference by the victims and their families? I hope they let questions be asked. I really want to hear the parents explained why they sent their underage daughters on trips with a pedo to private islands. Thats a big part of the untold story. The complicitness of the folks best in position to protect these girls.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

If the Epstein story has moved on as you say, why keep coming back to this thread? If the government isn't hiding information from us, whats wrong with forcing them to release what they have?

To make fun of the people who simply cannot move on.

And I have always supported the release of every single bit of information, completely unredacted.

Weren't we getting a press conference by the victims and their families? I hope they let questions be asked. I really want to hear the parents explained why they sent their underage daughters on trips with a pedo to private islands. Thats a big part of the untold story. The complicitness of the folks best in position to protect these girls.



"I want to make fun of people who can't move on but also I have always supported the release of every single bit of information"

Ok so if you have always supported the release of every single bit of info then you should be fine with Massie's HR that forces the govt to release every single bit of info.
Deerdude
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe it's so bad for some Trump is letting them beg for it to be released. A joint effort certainly fits that.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

If the Epstein story has moved on as you say, why keep coming back to this thread? If the government isn't hiding information from us, whats wrong with forcing them to release what they have?

To make fun of the people who simply cannot move on.

And I have always supported the release of every single bit of information, completely unredacted.

Weren't we getting a press conference by the victims and their families? I hope they let questions be asked. I really want to hear the parents explained why they sent their underage daughters on trips with a pedo to private islands. Thats a big part of the untold story. The complicitness of the folks best in position to protect these girls.



"I want to make fun of people who can't move on but also I have always supported the release of every single bit of information"

Ok so if you have always supported the release of every single bit of info then you should be fine with Massie's HR that forces the govt to release every single bit of info.

No, I think Massie should move on. This is not hard, please try to follow along.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol
Queso1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How can anyone that opposes this release have any political capital?
FWTXAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol


He supports Donald Trump. Full stop.

People who believe any of these politicians on either side would spit on them if they were on fire shows how far our society has fallen.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol

Makes no sense. I am amazed 3 people thought this made sense.

I can simultaneously think Massie should shut the **** up and personally support the release of information.

Sorry thats overly complex for some.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FWTXAg said:

PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol


He supports Donald Trump. Full stop.

People who believe any of these politicians on either side would spit on them if they were on fire shows how far our society has fallen.

I can answer for myself thank you.

I do support Trump. And I support him releasing the information as they have been doing.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol

Makes no sense. I am amazed 3 people thought this made sense.

I can simultaneously think Massie should shut the **** up and personally support the release of information.

Sorry thats overly complex for some.


So we have one politician that has a resolution that forces the government to release every bit of information (which you always supported), but also you think that same politician should "shut up and move on"?

Idk boss seems like you can't have both, you either support the full release and Massie's HR or you don't support the full release.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

Time for Massie to go ahead and make his DNC affiliation more formal.

Only reason he is doing this is to please Rand as Rand still wants things from Trump and is too ***** to do this himself.

See ya Massie.

"Everybody who wants the files released is a democrat!"

Dude come on.
Who?mikejones!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The reality is trump isnt going to be able to crawfish completely outta this one without spending tons of political capital.
Keyno
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

The reality is trump isnt going to be able to crawfish completely outta this one without spending tons of political capital.

This is probably correct. He's a lame duck President. Massie will probably keep the issue going for awhile but I doubt anything happens. Where we may see some fallout is in the midterms. Trump's "truth" post basically disavowing the support of anyone who believes in the Epstein Coverup will definitely be brought up.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I wonder who won't sign this
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol

Makes no sense. I am amazed 3 people thought this made sense.

I can simultaneously think Massie should shut the **** up and personally support the release of information.

Sorry thats overly complex for some.


So we have one politician that has a resolution that forces the government to release every bit of information (which you always supported), but also you think that same politician should "shut up and move on"?

Idk boss seems like you can't have both, you either support the full release and Massie's HR or you don't support the full release.

I don't think you work for me but appreciate the boss reference.

And quite easily I can have both. I think what Massie is doing is unnecessary, political bloviating.

I support Trump releasing every single unredacted detail. I do not support the fact he has not done so.

But I also do not care, don't think there is the gold mine of salacious detail people think there is, but have no issue with it all being released.

I hope all involved in illegal activities are accountable. I have been on an island asking for the parents to come forth and explain their complicitness in the trafficking of their daughters. But most here don't really care about that stuff. They claim to care about the "victims" but all they really want are lists and tabloid headlines. Have at it.

I personally do not need to see anything else other than apologies, verdicts, pleas and sentencing. I absolutely do not need a supposed R congress critter teaming up with a Dem 2028 POTUS wannabe to antagonize Trump and distract from other priorities that I happen to think are more critical right now.

Somehow all that critical, independent thinking makes me some Trump "sycophant". Okay. Just means you don't care to think critically and want your tabloid fodder. You do you.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who?mikejones! said:

The reality is trump isnt going to be able to crawfish completely outta this one without spending tons of political capital.

I dont think he is crawfishing.

He happens to be addressing currently occurring child sex trafficking but most seem to wish he would hush about that and get them their Epstein dirty knickers released.

One would think someone like Massie would care about funding border control and law enforcement instead of wanting files on Epstein released to assist his DNC pal.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

flown-the-coop said:

PaulsBunions said:

Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol

Makes no sense. I am amazed 3 people thought this made sense.

I can simultaneously think Massie should shut the **** up and personally support the release of information.

Sorry thats overly complex for some.


So we have one politician that has a resolution that forces the government to release every bit of information (which you always supported), but also you think that same politician should "shut up and move on"?

Idk boss seems like you can't have both, you either support the full release and Massie's HR or you don't support the full release.

I don't think you work for me but appreciate the boss reference.

And quite easily I can have both. I think what Massie is doing is unnecessary, political bloviating.

I support Trump releasing every single unredacted detail. I do not support the fact he has not done so.

But I also do not care, don't think there is the gold mine of salacious detail people think there is, but have no issue with it all being released.

I hope all involved in illegal activities are accountable. I have been on an island asking for the parents to come forth and explain their complicitness in the trafficking of their daughters. But most here don't really care about that stuff. They claim to care about the "victims" but all they really want are lists and tabloid headlines. Have at it.

I personally do not need to see anything else other than apologies, verdicts, pleas and sentencing. I absolutely do not need a supposed R congress critter teaming up with a Dem 2028 POTUS wannabe to antagonize Trump and distract from other priorities that I happen to think are more critical right now.

Somehow all that critical, independent thinking makes me some Trump "sycophant". Okay. Just means you don't care to think critically and want your tabloid fodder. You do you.


Ok, so Trump isn't doing what you want him to do in releasing everything but another politician who wants everything released is "political bloviating". Amazing.

The "R Critter" wouldn't have to team up with a hopeful DNC nominee if Trump would do what you want him to. If Trump has "other priorities" then he can simply endorse Massie's HR and be done with it.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:


Ok, so Trump isn't doing what you want him to do in releasing everything but another politician who wants everything released is "political bloviating". Amazing.

The "R Critter" wouldn't have to team up with a hopeful DNC nominee if Trump would do what you want him to. If Trump has "other priorities" then he can simply endorse Massie's HR and be done with it.

You seem hyperfocused on your tabloid. Let me help you.
https://nationalenquirer.com/?s=epstein

BTW - You ignore EVERYTHING in my post and still respond with support for your DNC friend Ro Khanna. Have at it.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If Rho Khanna said drinking water is good, and I agreed, would i be a disgusting lib for hydrating?

I don't care for his politics but like you I want all of the information released. Massie and Khanna put forth an HR to release all of the information. But somehow thats bad and anti-Trump?

I am in agreement with you, all of the info should be released. No other politician has put anything to paper to force the government to release everything. I guess since we both want everything released we both only care about headlines. I can't wait to see what dress T Swift chooses for her wedding with Travis Kelce.
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here you go. Take a breath, enjoy the afternoon.

https://nationalenquirer.com/?s=epstein
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No thanks, I'll just wait for the juicy gossip the government releases when the HR from the DC Critters Massie and Khanna passes. I just love to hear tea about our government's involvement with pedophiles.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://clerk.house.gov/DischargePetition/2025090209

Not sure how up to date this is, but you can see who signs the petition here. MTG and McGovern have tweeted that they signed it but their names aren't yet listed.



GMaster0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/09/02/epstein-files-released-oversight-committee-comer/

It's happening…..
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GMaster0 said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/09/02/epstein-files-released-oversight-committee-comer/

It's happening…..


For those hit by the paywall:

https://oversight.house.gov/release/oversight-committee-releases-epstein-records-provided-by-the-department-of-justice/
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Words

https://x .com/patel_patriot/status/1963003812953928170?t=QSbiRBlYCCvfKo_2ic_39Q&s=19
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PaulsBunions said:

No thanks, I'll just wait for the juicy gossip the government releases when the HR from the DC Critters Massie and Khanna passes. I just love to hear tea about our government's involvement with pedophiles.

Or you and your boy Massie Khanna could have just been patient for Comer and DOJ to continue releasing the files. But hey, its so much better than to think Trump part of a cover up and Saint Massie leading the charge of the tabloid crusade.
PaulsBunions
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do you believe what was released today is the "full release of information" you were alluding to earlier? If it isn't, are they not keeping what you say you want released away from the public?



Edit: prior tweet had profane language in the subtweet, found a similar one for my point.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.