PaulsBunions said:
flown-the-coop said:
PaulsBunions said:
Then you haven't "always supported the full release of information" lol
Makes no sense. I am amazed 3 people thought this made sense.
I can simultaneously think Massie should shut the **** up and personally support the release of information.
Sorry thats overly complex for some.
So we have one politician that has a resolution that forces the government to release every bit of information (which you always supported), but also you think that same politician should "shut up and move on"?
Idk boss seems like you can't have both, you either support the full release and Massie's HR or you don't support the full release.
I don't think you work for me but appreciate the boss reference.
And quite easily I can have both. I think what Massie is doing is unnecessary, political bloviating.
I support Trump releasing every single unredacted detail. I do not support the fact he has not done so.
But I also do not care, don't think there is the gold mine of salacious detail people think there is, but have no issue with it all being released.
I hope all involved in illegal activities are accountable. I have been on an island asking for the parents to come forth and explain their complicitness in the trafficking of their daughters. But most here don't really care about that stuff. They claim to care about the "victims" but all they really want are lists and tabloid headlines. Have at it.
I personally do not need to see anything else other than apologies, verdicts, pleas and sentencing. I absolutely do not need a supposed R congress critter teaming up with a Dem 2028 POTUS wannabe to antagonize Trump and distract from other priorities that I happen to think are more critical right now.
Somehow all that critical, independent thinking makes me some Trump "sycophant". Okay. Just means you don't care to think critically and want your tabloid fodder. You do you.